Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by James Kovacevic 2 Comments

The 5 Levels of Maintenance Scheduling

airline schedule board
Photo by Qfamily

Making Maintenance Scheduling Simple

Coordinating all of the maintenance activities within a site can be overwhelming. A schedule is supposed to help reduce the sense of being overwhelmed. But why is it that when trying to pull together a schedule for the next shift, day or week, it always seems to be a mad dash?

Often times the maintenance scheduling process is not well defined or thought out, and this leads to being overwhelmed. It also projects an image to our operational partners that we do not have our house in order. This image may or may not play a role in having our Maintenance windows moved or cancelled, further our scheduling issues.

Having a simple, easy to use scheduling process can reduce the mad dash and enable us to project an image of being in control of our work. This leads to trust with the Operations planning team, creating an integrate schedule.

When I first starting working with a site, the site was very reactive; the Planner/Scheduler was trying to put together the weekly schedule at 7:00pm on a Friday night. Come Monday the schedule would change so much that it was unrecognizable.   During some discussions, the Operations teams stated that when Maintenance as given windows, they weren’t used or the equipment ran worse than before.

Obviously they did not believe in the maintenance department, and had no problem changing their schedule. When I discussed this with the maintenance team, they stated they had issues resourcing the windows as Operations always moved the windows without consulting them. A vicious cycle indeed.

To put a stop to this cycle, we immediately begin defining a simple, easy to use scheduling system. This scheduling approach works by using horizons. Horizons are different levels of scheduling that build on one another, resulting in a long reaching, easy to utilize approach. It all begins with the;

52 Week Schedule: The 52 week schedule provide the foundation of the Scheduling Horizon system. It enables the operation to focus on the exceptions, not the norms. Once properly defined, the 52 week schedule support an integrating scheduling with operations. So what exactly is it?

The 52 week schedule is a high level view of the reoccurring work. This includes PMs, Overhauls, Inspections, etc. Any work that is known to be required over the course of an average year. Once the reoccurring work has been identified, it needs to be leveled.   This ensures there is a consistent amount of reoccurring work each week. This level work load establishes the equipment requirements each week. It also allows the Shutdowns to be identified within an approximate timeline. This can be integrated with the operations scheduling to further define equipment requirements. An important note with 52 week scheduling. Specific work orders are not identified during this horizon. The schedule only looks at capacity requirements.

Once the reoccurring work load foundation is in place, the system can be started using the;

Daily Prioritization Meeting: The Daily Prioritization Meeting involves the Planner/Scheduler and the Maintenance Supervisor. During this meeting all new request are reviewed using a simple logic diagram, which defines when the work should be scheduled, using the horizons.

daily prioritization meeting flowchart

Using this approach with the horizons, the Planning group can begin to build a high level schedule for the next 16 weeks. This also enables the Planner to prioritization their own activities as well.

16 Week: As work is prioritized, it begins to fill the 16 weeks. This allows the site to develop a short term strategic plan. Utilizing this 16 week schedule, a robust schedule can be develop with operations, identifying which process or systems can be planned down for a particular week.

During the horizon, all reoccurring work and all newly identified work is specified with work orders. This enables the Planner/Scheduler to identify material, resource and equipment constraints and work to optimize the schedule. Any given week from week 5 to 16 has approx. 60% of capacity filled with work.

4 Week: The 4 week schedule is the high level tactical schedule. During this period the exact dates and times of the planned downtime windows are finalized with operations. The Planner/Scheduler continues to refine the schedule and finalize all material and resource availability issues. During week 2 to 4 approx. 80% of the capacity has been filled with work.

1 Week: The Tactical Schedule. The 1 week schedule is typically a snip of the 4 week schedule. It is during this time that 100% of capacity is filled with work, resulting from priority corrective and breakdown work, along with pulling ahead any work as needed. This is the last horizon that the Planner/Scheduler will touch the schedule. It is then handed over to the Maintenance Supervisor(s) at least 3 days before the start of the week.

Day / Shift: The Day/Shift schedule is managed by the Maintenance Supervisor(s). They have the schedule for the week, and know their crew. Giving the Maintenance Supervisor(s) the ability to manage the work on his crew allows them to address any manpower & operational issues, and providing the best service for the business.

Initially this approach is a bit time consuming as the work is leveled, and the new Daily Prioritization Meeting is adopted. But based on experience, the approach will reduce the stress and time to produce a workable schedule, resulting in more time to develop better job plans, and reduce wrench time barriers.

How do you manage your Maintenance Scheduling? Do you use horizons or just put the work in the first available slot? What is your largest challenge in Maintenance Scheduling? I highly encourage you to share your feedback.

Remember, to find success, you must first solve the problem, then achieve the implementation of the solution, and finally sustain winning results.

I’m James Kovacevic
HP RELIABILITY
Solve, Achieve, Sustain

 

 

No Fields Found.

Filed Under: Articles, Maintenance and Reliability, on Maintenance Reliability Tagged With: James Kovacevic, maintenance scheduling

About James Kovacevic

James is a trainer, speaker, and consultant that specializes in bringing profitability, productivity, availability, and sustainability to manufacturers around the globe.

Through his career, James has made it his personal mission to make industry a profitable place; where individuals and manufacturers possess the resources, knowledge, and courage to sustainably lower their operating costs.

« How Well Do Risk Assessments Inform Decision Makers?
Increase Productivity and Competitiveness with MRO Technology – Part 1 »

Comments

  1. Leslie says

    July 11, 2020 at 2:46 PM

    Please provide more information on article

    Reply
    • Fred Schenkelberg says

      July 12, 2020 at 8:12 AM

      Hi Leslie,

      What kind of additional information are you looking for here?

      cheers,

      Fred

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Maintenance & Reliability series


by James Kovacevic
High Performance Reliability

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • test
  • test
  • test
  • Your Most Important Business Equation
  • Your Suppliers Can Be a Risk to Your Project

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy