Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

All articles listed in reverse chronological order.

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

The 2015 Recommended References Survey

The 2015 Recommended References Survey

Becoming an ASQ CRE is one milestone in your career. It involved gathering experience and studying the broad reliability engineering body of knowledge.

It also involved an ongoing application of what you know and learn. I’ve found being a reliability engineer involves learning about materials, designs, systems, people, and tools & techniques. Mastery takes time and a good library. [Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, CRE Prep, CRE Preparation Notes Tagged With: references

by Fred Schenkelberg 3 Comments

The Stress-Strength Concept in Practice

The Stress-Strength Concept in Practice

Ideally, in every design of every component, the stress–strength relationship looks like this figure. The stress is well below the strength.

Stress-Strength-apart

This implies there is very little chance of failure due to the element being overstressed.

Also, ideally, we fully characterize all stresses and all strengths for each element of a product. This is generally difficult to accomplish and it is rarely done to that extent.

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics, on Product Reliability Tagged With: design, Stress Strength Analysis

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

Does HALT Lead to Product Over-Design?

Does HALT Lead to Product Over-Design?

Every once in a while I see a comment that by following the HALT methodology you will “over design” a product.

Many question at what point or operational limit do you quit increasing the stress-strength margins. Those who hold this view of HALT do not understand the essence of what was Gregg Hobbs’ principles and paradigm shift. [Read more…]

Filed Under: Accelerated Reliability, Articles, on Product Reliability Tagged With: design, HALT

by nomtbf Leave a Comment

5 Things You Can Do Today to Avoid Using MTBF

5 Things You Can Do Today to Avoid Using MTBF

14597503837_2511f1d075_oTake Action Today to Improve How Your Organization Talks About Reliability

You know the perils of MTBF use. The widespread misunderstanding and mis-use. You know about how MTBF treats your data poorly.

You also know everyone around you uses MTBF. Your industry uses MTBF. And, now one likes change, least of all about metrics concerning reliability.

As I said to a friend this morning, “The madness has to stop.”

And, you feel that say way. So, what are you going to do about it? Here are five things you can do today.

  1. Use the data to calculate reliability (probability of success) over a duration of interest along with calculating MTBF, then share the results.

  2. Encourage five of your colleagues to check out and subscribe to this site, www.nomtbf.com.

  3. Ask a vendor how they determined the MTBF value they are presenting on the data sheet? What evidence supports that claim and what assumptions are included (often unstated)?

  4. The next time you hear someone mention MTBF, ask them what do they mean? And, than ask what percentage of items should survive a year? If they are not consistent  — you found a learning opportunity.

  5. Write a blog post for the www.nomtbf.com site. What have you done to encourage better understanding of reliability concepts in your world? Share you hints, tips, stories, and advice here.

Pick one for today and do as many as you can. What would you add to this list? What kind responses are you receiving when you speak out about the perils of MTBF.

Keep up the effort. Together we are making progress. Thanks for the support.

Filed Under: Articles, NoMTBF

by Fred Schenkelberg 1 Comment

3 Elements of Reliability Goal Setting

3 Elements of Reliability Goal Setting

Embarking on a product development project contains many aspirations, including that the product should work as expected.

The device functions and does so over time. Enough time for the customer to deem the device reliable.

That is one way to approach setting a reliability goal for a project. Estimate what will delight the customer. Set a target for how long without failure your new design function.

The goal provides a focus for the team. [Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, CRE Preparation Notes, Reliability Management Tagged With: Customer Needs Assessment

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

Life Testing Starting Point

Life Testing Starting Point

Reliability or life testing involves estimating the expected durability over time of an item.

This may be an entire system, a product, or an individual component. We may also focus on an element of a component, such has a material property.

At the end of the testing, we want to say something meaningful about the expected performance over time. [Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics, on Product Reliability Tagged With: Accelerated life tests

by Tim Rodgers 2 Comments

Improving Quality in China

Improving Quality in China

Many years ago people would complain about “cheap Japanese” products, but today few people would associate Japanese brands with poor quality.

The turn-around is widely attributed to Deming, and Taguchi, and Juran, and other evangelists who taught not only the tools and processes but also the long-term benefits that can be realized when a company adopts good practices and a culture of quality.

Today I hear people complaining about poor quality in Chinese-made parts and products, and there have been several widely-publicized incidents (see Aston-Martin and counterfeit parts).

Many customers have decided to move their production and seek part suppliers in other locations, including “re-shoring” to North America, in part because they’ve concluded that any cost savings due to cheaper labor are outweighed by the costs of poor quality.

It’s hard to say whether this will have a negative impact on the worldwide consumer perception of Chinese brands such as Lenovo, Haier, and others.

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, Managing in the 2000s, on Leadership & Career Tagged With: supplier, supply chain

by nomtbf Leave a Comment

How to Translate Customer Expectations About Reliability

How to Translate Customer Expectations About Reliability

14597486647_71b21d9d29_zHow to Translate Customer Expectations About Reliability

As a customer when I purchase a new car, a toaster, or a pump for my production line, I expect it to work. To Just Work. As a reliability professional, I also have the language to specify what I mean by, ‘just work’.

Customers that are not reliability engineers do not accurately specify what they mean by ‘it should just work’. So, we have to do a little extra to help translate that they want into specifications that we (manufacturer of the item) can create and deliver. [Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, NoMTBF

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

Warranty Policy Establishment

Warranty Policy Establishment

A common question concerns the warranty period.

How long should we, the manufacture guarantee that our product will work as expected? Do we include limitations or not? How do we decide? [Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, CRE Preparation Notes, Reliability Management Tagged With: Warranty Management

by Fred Schenkelberg 2 Comments

A Brief Introduction to HALT

A Brief Introduction to HALT

Highly Accelerated Life Testing (HALT) is a technique to expose weaknesses or faults with a product.

HALT uses individual or combined stresses in a step stress approach to quickly apply sufficient stress to reveal defects.

HALT is not a specific chamber or fixed set of test conditions. It is an exploratory process to reveal weaknesses in a design.

The product development process naturally includes a check step, to determine if the expected functions of the product work as expected.

Some teams then add a measured amount of stress (temperature, vibration, dust, load, etc.) to the product to explore functionality at elevated stress levels. [Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics, on Product Reliability Tagged With: HALT, Reliability Testing, testing

by nomtbf Leave a Comment

Is Reliability Just Testing?

Is Reliability Just Testing?

Is Reliability Just Testing?

14597483807_4d45aa3e9e_oI endured a difficult conversation with a project manager yesterday. The meeting agenda included an initial discussion about the product development reliability plan. She agreed that we needed to identify risks and provide feedback to the team concerning product reliability. [Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, NoMTBF

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

The Exciting World of Warranty Terms

The Exciting World of Warranty Terms

Here’s a short list of terms related to warranty management. Often is the words we use that matter and understanding the language of warranties is one step in mastering warranty management.

Warranty

A promise made to the buyer of an item that the manufacturer (seller) will repair or replace the item if necessary within a specific time period. [Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, CRE Preparation Notes, Reliability Management Tagged With: Warranty Management

by Tim Rodgers 3 Comments

Why Should a Supplier Work Harder For You?

Why Should a Supplier Work Harder For You?

A recent LinkedIn discussion addressed the question of the best strategy for dealing with poor supplier performance.

A lot of the respondents seemed to advocate a punitive approach, either threatening the loss of future business if performance doesn’t improve, or combing through the terms & conditions of the contract for enforcement language.

I’ve always thought that there’s a lot of similarity between managing suppliers and managing subordinates, and I wonder if some of these same people threaten their teams with punitive actions when individual performance doesn’t meet expectations. [Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, Managing in the 2000s, on Leadership & Career

by nomtbf Leave a Comment

Popular Reliability Measures and Their Problems

Popular Reliability Measures and Their Problems

Popular Reliability Measures and Their Problems

 

14597433337_8392823f80_zMTBF

Mean time between failure or mean time before failure is very common. The common definition describes MTBF as a reliability measure that is calculated by tallying operating hours and dividing by the number of failures. Intuitively this is the average time until a failure occurs. Mathematically it is the inverse of the failure rate. Generally used for repairable systems. [Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, NoMTBF

by Fred Schenkelberg 1 Comment

What is the Link between Reliability and Brand?

What is the Link between Reliability and Brand?

In short, you probably do, better reliability performance the better the brand image.

When I’m making a purchase I prefer to buy items that I either have personal experience work well over time (reliable) or have many comments and reviews noting the durability.

As a reliability engineer, I am often asked what kind of car I drive (a Toyota Highlander, if must know). Reliability does matter -not only to me- it matters for many making a buying decision.

When a product’s actual reliability performance exceeds the customers expected reliability performance, the customer may consider the product reliable. This experience builds and when supported by other experiences from the same brand, increases brand equity. High brand equity permits a price premium, increased brand loyalty, and increased positive word of mouth support. [Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics, on Product Reliability Tagged With: value

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 185
  • 186
  • 187
  • 188
  • 189
  • …
  • 215
  • Next Page »

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • test
  • test
  • test
  • Your Most Important Business Equation
  • Your Suppliers Can Be a Risk to Your Project

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy