Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

How to Calculate Reliability Given 3 Different Distributions

How to Calculate Reliability Given 3 Different Distributions

On occasion, we want to estimate the reliability of an item at a specific time.

Maybe we are considering extending the warranty period, for example, and want to know the probability of no failures over one year instead of over the current 3 months.

Or, let’s say you talked to a bearing vendor and have the Weibull parameters and wish to know the reliability value over 2 years.

Whatever specific situation, you have the life distributions parameters. You just need to calculate reliability at a specific time. We can do that and let’s try it with three distributions using their respective reliability functions: exponential, Weibull, and lognormal.

The Exponential Reliability Function

Let’s say the motor driver board has a data sheet value for θ (commonly called MTBF) of 50,000 hours. Let’s say we are interested in the reliability (probability of successful operation) over a year or 8,760 hours.

The reliability function for the exponential distribution is:

$$ \displaystyle\large R(t)={{e}^{-{}^{t}\!\!\diagup\!\!{}_{\theta }\;}}={{e}^{-\lambda t}}$$

Setting θ to 50,000 hours and time, t, to 8,760 hours we find:

$$ \displaystyle\large R(t)={{e}^{-{}^{8,760}\!\!\diagup\!\!{}_{50,000}\;}}=0.839$$

Thus the reliability at one year is 83.9%.

Tip: check the units of the MTBF and time, t, values, they should match. If using failure rate, lambda, remember that θ = 1 / λ, to also check the units. The time element of the failure rate should be in the same units as the time, t, value. If interested in hours, then the failure rate is in failures per hour.

We could use years, as we’re interested in the reliability over a year, and would have to adjust the MTBF or failure rate value to the units of years. 50,000 hours becomes roughly 5.71 years MTBF, for example. Found by dividing 50,000 by the hours in a year, 8,760.

The Weibull Reliability Function

A recent accelerated life test of bearings resulted in the Weibull parameters of β = 2.1 and η = 48,500 hours. What is the reliability at one year, or 8,760 hours?

The reliability function for the Weibull distribution is:

$$ \displaystyle\large R(t)={{e}^{-{{\left( {}^{t}\!\!\diagup\!\!{}_{\eta }\; \right)}^{\beta }}}}$$

Where β is the shape parameter and η is the scale parameter.

Given the β and η above what is the reliability at 8,760 hours?

$$ \displaystyle\large R(t)={{e}^{-{{\left( {}^{8,760}\!\!\diagup\!\!{}_{48,500}\; \right)}^{2.1}}}}=0.973$$

Thus given the Weibull parameters we expect a reliability at one year of 97.3%.

Remember that if time equals η it doesn’t matter what the β value is, the reliability is 36.8%. Try it.

The Lognormal Reliability Function

The lognormal life distribution is similar to the Weibull distribution, yet parameters are the mean and standard deviation of the transformed data (take the natural log of each data point).

Let’s say we have the lognormal parameters of μ’ = 6.19  and σ’ = 0.2642 (calculated using days as the unit of time within the example in Calculating Lognormal Distribution Parameters article).

What is the reliability at one year, or 365 days?

The reliability function of the lognormal distribution is:

$$ \displaystyle\large R(t)=1-\Phi \left( \frac{\ln \left( t \right)-{\mu }’}{{{\sigma }’}} \right)$$

Where the prime indicates the mean and standard deviation are of the transformed data. The Φ(x) is the standard normal cumulative distribution function (think standard normal table here).

Using the given parameters and setting t to 365 we find:

$$ \displaystyle\large R(t)=1-\Phi \left( \frac{\ln \left( 365 \right)-6.19}{0.26} \right)=0.868$$

Pay attention to units once again.

Summary

Given life distribution parameters all you need is reliability function for the distribution. A little skill with a calculator and you can quickly calculate the reliability value for time, t.

Filed Under: Articles, CRE Preparation Notes, Probability and Statistics for Reliability Tagged With: Discrete and continuous probability distributions, Exponential Distribution, Failure Rate, weibull, Weibull Distribution

About Fred Schenkelberg

I am the reliability expert at FMS Reliability, a reliability engineering and management consulting firm I founded in 2004. I left Hewlett Packard (HP)’s Reliability Team, where I helped create a culture of reliability across the corporation, to assist other organizations.

« Telematics Data – Preparation For Analysis
Have good valve decontamination practices »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CRE Preparation Notes

Article by Fred Schenkelberg

Join Accendo

Join our members-only community for full access to exclusive eBooks, webinars, training, and more.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Get Full Site Access

Not ready to join?
Stay current on new articles, podcasts, webinars, courses and more added to the Accendo Reliability website each week.
No membership required to subscribe.

[popup type="" link_text="Get Weekly Email Updates" link_class="button" ]

[/popup]

  • CRE Preparation Notes
  • CRE Prep
  • Reliability Management
  • Probability and Statistics for Reliability
  • Reliability in Design and Development
  • Reliability Modeling and Predictions
  • Reliability Testing
  • Maintainability and Availability
  • Data Collection and Use

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy