Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Adam Bahret Leave a Comment

Correctly categorizing a root caused failure is everything

Correctly categorizing a root caused failure is everything

You have been put in charge of a program to study failure rates of brake pads.  The place to start is a testing program that will generate data for analysis.

Testing programs should begin with a specific intent.  This may be to characterize quality based failures, use life, or wear-out failure modes. When a test is complete it is easy to take all observed failures and use them in the data set to characterize the failure mode. This is a mistake.

Each of the study intents I described above can be attributed to wanting to understand a specific section of the life curve that is commonly represented by the “bathtub” curve.

The three phases of the bathtub curve are, Infant Mortality, Use Life, and Wear-out.  Each are driven by specific factors.  By root causing the observed failures from testing they can be grouped with the corresponding life phase.  So you can imagine that incorrectly grouping the failure modes can have a large effect on that characterization of a phase.

  • Quality Failures are driven by a combination of manufacturing variability and design tolerances.
    • Corrective action to improve this type of failure is improving the manufacturing process and adjusting tolerances on key design features.
  • Use Life failures are characterized by variability in use and environment in combination with stress margins of the design failure modes.
    • To improve use life failures the study of use case and environment will direct design and stress margins.
  • Wear-out are characterized as a predictable failure mode that is a design characteristic.   It has an average time to fail with a normal/lognormal distribution around it that is driven by a combination of variables from quality, use, and environment.
    • To improve use life the design must be changed or a preventive maintenance strategy must will be created.

The brake pad study:

How Brakes work:

Car brakes are simple.  They convert motion to heat.  This is done by having a steel disc rotate with your wheel and then Car Brakes Diagramsqueezing the disk with a brake pad to create friction. It is the exact same principle as on your bike brakes.  You pull the handle and two pads squeeze your wheel rim until enough friction is created to stop the bike.  The kinetic energy of the bike was converted to heat on the pads and rim.

Bicycle brake pads and car brake pads look almost exactly the same.  A metal backing plate and a friction material attached together.  The bike friction material is usually hard rubber and the car is usually a composite of rubber/glass/metal/ceramic/metal shavings/resin/Swedish Fish (Saab).bake pads

Testing has been completed and there is a mountain of data that needs to be transformed into information. These are the types of failures we may have to root cause.

  • Shattered brake pad.
    • Root cause analysis shows there was a bubble in the center of the brake pad when it was cast. It would be grouped for the analysis data set used in an Infant mortality characterization.
  • Cracked brake pad
    • Root cause analysis found cause to be a heavy heat load followed by a sudden cooling from driving through a puddle. This is grouped as Use-case variability and would be apart of the use life data set.
  • Brake material completely consumed
    • Expected result of accumulated stress/use and grouped as a Wear-out data point.

Having the shattered brake pad data points (Infant Mortality) included in the wear-out data set would dramatically shift the wear-out distribution curve into the use life.  This would result in a scramble to change the design so the brake pad life can be extended.  This is unfortunate because it may be that in fact, the brake pads use life exceeds specifications and this new initiative will add cost, weight, and delay time to release the new product.  All while not directing attention to the actual cause of that failure type which is the poor molding of the pads in production.

 

That is a lot of damage to a product development program from the simple error like poor data grouping.

-Adam

giphy

“Test Engineer Consumption”

 

 

Filed Under: Apex Ridge, Articles, on Product Reliability

About Adam Bahret

I am a Reliability engineer with over 20 years of experience in mechanical and electrical systems in many industries. I founded Apex Ridge Reliability as a firm to assist technology companies with the critical reliability steps in their product development programs and organizational culture.

« Personal Risk and Big Data
Uptime: Managing Failures Before They Occur »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Article by Adam Bahret
in the Apex Ridge series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • test
  • test
  • test
  • Your Most Important Business Equation
  • Your Suppliers Can Be a Risk to Your Project

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy