Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Steven Wachs Leave a Comment

Conducting the Experiment

Conducting the Experiment

In this week’s article entry, we discuss some guidelines for conducting an experiment.  As we discussed in an earlier post, planning the study is critical for a successful outcome.  A good plan makes the conduct of the study straightforward.

Below are some key aspects of conducting the study:

The key points are summarized below:

  • First, the planning step should include the development of the protocol.  That is, what treatments are to be run and in what order.  So when conducting the experiment, it is important to follow the protocol.  Whoever is helping to run the study (such as operators) should understand the importance of the protocol such as the order of the treatments, the factor levels to be changed and the specific levels, and how to record the responses.
  • It is highly recommended that someone be assigned to supervise the study.  Given the investment in experimentation, it is important to avoid mistakes.
  • When conducting the study, any factors that are not specifically part of the study should be held as constant as possible.  Changes in factors that are not purposely changed as part of the study may impact the results and may contaminate the analysis.  It is a good idea to have a single person measure the key responses to avoid any unnecessary variation / error coming form the measurement process.  The less variation due to any factor other than those purposely varied in the study the better.
  • As discussed in previous posts, randomization is particularly important to avoid potentially confounding results.  Some operators may look at the design matrix and decide to conduct the experiment more efficiently and not realize the importance of randomization.
  • Blocking should be considered for factors that are nuisance variables (such as lot or batch of material) that can impact the responses.  Finally, consider recording variables that are changing uncontrollably as covariates.
  • Conduct the study in as short a period of time as possible to minimize the chance that special causes of variation impact the study.  For example rather than take a whole  week by running a few treatments each day after normal production is complete, it would be better to run production a bit longer each day to free up an entire day at the end of the week to run the study.
  • Record the response data for each treatment as they are conducted.  It is important to not mix up the order of the runs when measuring the responses as of course this will destroy the integrity of the results.  When parts or specimens must be measured elsewhere (like in a lab), it is critical that the parts be marked in a way such that it is known which experimental treatment they belong to
  • If replication is part of the protocol, the replicate treatments should be performed after the initial set of treatment is performed.

Following the above guidelines will likely ensure that the experiment will be successful.

In the next article, we will (finally) discuss the analysis of the data and the development of mathematical models.

Filed Under: Articles, Integral Concepts, on Tools & Techniques

About Steven Wachs

Steven Wachs has 25 years of wide-ranging industry experience in both technical and management positions. Steve has worked as a statistician at Ford Motor Company where he has extensive experience in the development of statistical models, reliability analysis, designed experimentation, and statistical process control.

« Loss Analysis
Uptime Insights – 4 – Basic Care »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Articles by Steven Wachs, Integral Concepts
in the Integral Concepts article series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • test
  • test
  • test
  • Your Most Important Business Equation
  • Your Suppliers Can Be a Risk to Your Project

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy