Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

Confidence Interval for a Proportion – Normal Approximation

Confidence Interval for a Proportion – Normal Approximation

Edited by John Healy

There are a number of different methods to calculate confidence intervals for a proportion. The normal approximation method is easy to use and is appropriate in most cases.

Clopper and Pearson describe the Clopper-Pearson method also called the exact confidence interval and we’ll describe it in a separate article.

There are other methods, which again will find a description in separate articles.

The normal approximation method is appropriate when both

$$ \large\displaystyle \begin{array}{l}np&>5\\n\left( 1-p \right)&>5\end{array}$$

Where n is the number of items in the sample
And, p is the proportion of ‘successes’ over n.

If the data does not meet this set of criteria then do not use the method.

Successes are defined generally by convention or convince. For example, when determining the proportion of functional (flawless) bolts in a batch, we can inspect and count the good bolts. Thus the ratio of good bolts (successes) over the total number of bolts is a proportion. We could also define a ‘success’ as a faulty bolt, thus determining the proportion of faulty bolts or a defective proportion.

Normal Approximation Method Formula

The formula for a two-sided confidence interval is

$$ \large\displaystyle p\pm {{z}_{\tfrac{\alpha }{2}}}\sqrt{\frac{p\left( 1-p \right)}{n}}$$

Where, $latex alpha $ is one minus the confidence
And, z value is the probability from the z-table corresponding to the desired confidence. For example, for a two-sided 95% confidence interval, $- \alpha/2=0.05/2=0.025-$ thus the z value is $- {{z}_{\alpha/2}}-$ is 1.96.

For a one-sided lower confidence interval use

$$ \large\displaystyle p-{{z}_{\alpha }}\sqrt{\frac{p\left( 1-p \right)}{n}}$$

And for a one-sided upper confidence interval use

$$ \large\displaystyle p+{{z}_{\alpha }}\sqrt{\frac{p\left( 1-p \right)}{n}}$$

Note the use of $- \alpha -$ instead of $- \alpha /2-$.

An Example

Let’s say we have a sample of 100 bolts from a mixed bin of thousands of bolts containing grade 2 and 5 bolts, n = 100. And, through inspection, we find 58 that are grade 2 and 42 are grade 5. What is the estimated proportion of grade 2 bolts with a 95% confidence interval?

Check the assumption of $- np>5 -$ and $- n\left( 1-p \right)>5 -$ first.

$$ \large\displaystyle \begin{array}{*{35}{l}}
np=100\left( .58 \right)=58&>5 \\
n\left( 1-p \right)=100\left( 1-.58 \right)=42&>5 \\
\end{array}$$

Thus both criteria are met so we can use the normal approximation method.

For a two-sided 95% confidence interval the area under the tail of the normal distribution is $- \alpha/2=0.05/2=0.025 -$ and we use the standard normal table to find the z value. In this case, it is 1.96.
And, we know the sample provided a count of 0.58 grade 2 bolts. Thus we can calculate the confidence interval with

$$ \large\displaystyle \begin{array}{l}p\pm {{z}_{\tfrac{\alpha }{2}}}\sqrt{\frac{p\left( 1-p \right)}{n}}\\0.58\pm 1.96\sqrt{\frac{0.58\left( 1-0.58 \right)}{100}}\\0.58\pm 0.14\end{array}$$

Or, based on the sample we expect with 95% confidence that the actual proportion of grade 2 bolts in the large bin of thousands of bolts is somewhere between 0.44 and 0.72.


Related:

Tolerance Intervals for Normal Distribution Based Set of Data (article)

Hypothesis Tests for Proportion (article)

Two Proportions Hypothesis Testing (article)

 

Filed Under: Articles, CRE Preparation Notes, Probability and Statistics for Reliability Tagged With: Statistical Interval Estimates

About Fred Schenkelberg

I am the reliability expert at FMS Reliability, a reliability engineering and management consulting firm I founded in 2004. I left Hewlett Packard (HP)’s Reliability Team, where I helped create a culture of reliability across the corporation, to assist other organizations.

« Supply Chain Process Control and Capability
Life Estimates Based on Supplier Data »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CRE Preparation Notes

Article by Fred Schenkelberg

Join Accendo

Join our members-only community for full access to exclusive eBooks, webinars, training, and more.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Get Full Site Access

Not ready to join?
Stay current on new articles, podcasts, webinars, courses and more added to the Accendo Reliability website each week.
No membership required to subscribe.

[popup type="" link_text="Get Weekly Email Updates" link_class="button" ]

[/popup]

  • CRE Preparation Notes
  • CRE Prep
  • Reliability Management
  • Probability and Statistics for Reliability
  • Reliability in Design and Development
  • Reliability Modeling and Predictions
  • Reliability Testing
  • Maintainability and Availability
  • Data Collection and Use

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy