Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Richard Coronado 1 Comment

Confidence Limits

Confidence Limits

Last week during our CRE Test Prep class, we were covering the Basic Statistics section in the CRE Primer and had several questions regarding Confidence Limits for Reliability.

All of them were fair questions, and when students are asking these types of questions, the class gets better…

For those of you that have the CRE Primer recall question 3.40 in Section III Basic Statistical Concepts.  The question asks for you to calculate the 90% confidence interval for reliability at 130 hours.  They provide you with five items that underwent a test:  3 of them failed after 43, 57, and 80 hours, and the other two units survived the test at 100 hours without failing.

Since the items that did not fail were not removed from testing at the same time as the last failure, this is Time Censoring.

When I was explaining this exercise, we had a great conversation on the different types of Censoring:

  • Non Censored Data:  When units are tested to failure, either repairable or non-repairable (MTTF), the estimate of the MTBF (θ) is simply the ratio of total test time divided by the number of failures during the test.
  • Type I Censoring or Time Censoring:  A test is initiated with a number of items and is terminated after a predetermined time.
  • Type II Censoring, Failure Censoring, or Truncation:  Consider a test initiated with a  number of items and terminated after a predetermined number of failures.
  • Right Censoring:  An item is censored on the right if the failure time is not known, but it is known that the item survived to a known time without failure.
  • Left Censoring:  If an item is known to be in a failed condition at a specific time, but the exact failure time is not known, this is left censoring.

After a good discussion, we returned to problem 3.40 of the CRE Primer and discussed what chi-square formula to use in this problem.

Since the test was not terminated due to a predetermined number if failures, this is an example of Time Censoring.

Where T represents the total test time for all items, both failed and un-failed, and r is the number of failed, a (1-α)% confidence limit for θ is:

$$ \large\displaystyle \frac{2T}{\chi _{\frac{\alpha }{2},\text{ }2r+2}^{2}}\le \theta \le \frac{2T}{\chi _{1-\frac{\alpha }{2},\text{ }2r}^{2}}$$

From the chi-square tables we get the following:

The critical value of the chi-square distribution with alpha = 0.05 and 8 degrees of freedom is 15.507

The critical value of the chi-square distribution with alpha = 0.95 and 6 degrees of freedom is 1.635

After plugging and chugging the numbers into the chi-square formula and the Exponential Reliability Function, we all concluded that answer was 0.0705 ≤ R ≤ 0.7560

This was a great exercise I am sure that you might see one like it on the CRE Test….


Related:

Censored Data and CDF Plotting Points (article)

Two Stones Question (article)

Hypothesis Testing (article)

 

Filed Under: Articles, CRE Preparation Notes, Probability and Statistics for Reliability Tagged With: Statistical Interval Estimates, statistics

« Datasheet MTBF
Common Cause Failures »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CRE Preparation Notes

Article by Fred Schenkelberg

Join Accendo

Join our members-only community for full access to exclusive eBooks, webinars, training, and more.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Get Full Site Access

Not ready to join?
Stay current on new articles, podcasts, webinars, courses and more added to the Accendo Reliability website each week.
No membership required to subscribe.

[popup type="" link_text="Get Weekly Email Updates" link_class="button" ]

[/popup]

  • CRE Preparation Notes
  • CRE Prep
  • Reliability Management
  • Probability and Statistics for Reliability
  • Reliability in Design and Development
  • Reliability Modeling and Predictions
  • Reliability Testing
  • Maintainability and Availability
  • Data Collection and Use

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy