Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Fred Schenkelberg 5 Comments

Contingency Coefficient

Contingency Coefficient

A contingency table, as in the chi-squared test of independence, reveals if two sets of data or groups are independent or not. It does not reveal the strength of the dependence. The contingency coefficient is a non-parametric measure of the association for cross-classification data.

After calculating the chi-squared value from the contingency table exercise, we can use that value to determine the contingency coefficient with the following formula.

$$ \large\displaystyle C=\sqrt{\frac{{{\chi }^{2}}}{n+{{\chi }^{2}}}}$$

where

$$ \large\displaystyle {{\chi }^{2}}=\sum{\frac{{{\left( O-E \right)}^{2}}}{E}}$$

and, n = total sample size.

See the article on the  $- \chi^2 -$ test of independence for information on the contingency table and calculations.

If C is zero of very near zero there is no association between the two groups. If the C value is closer to 1 there is a strong negative or positive association.

One of the disadvantages to the coefficient is it generally does not achieve 1 even if there is completely dependent on one another. You can determine the theoretical max C value with r (the number of rows and columns – which must be equal)

$$ \large\displaystyle {{C}_{\max }}=\sqrt{\frac{r-1}{r}}$$

For a two by two table, C has a possible maximum of 0.707.

Example

Using the value of chi-squared from the test of independence example of 7.5, which has a sample size of 40, we find

$$ \large\displaystyle C=\sqrt{\frac{7.5}{40+7.5}}=0.397$$

Which suggest a modest association between a person’s position and their opinion.


Related:

Kendall Coefficient of Concordance (article)

Chi-Square Test of Independence (article)

Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient (article)

 

Filed Under: Articles, CRE Preparation Notes, Probability and Statistics for Reliability Tagged With: Non-parametric statistical methods

About Fred Schenkelberg

I am the reliability expert at FMS Reliability, a reliability engineering and management consulting firm I founded in 2004. I left Hewlett Packard (HP)’s Reliability Team, where I helped create a culture of reliability across the corporation, to assist other organizations.

« Reliability Target Establishment
Required Case History for Reliability Engineers »

Comments

  1. Mr. T says

    April 1, 2020 at 6:10 AM

    Great article.

    This was probably a typo and I’m sure you knew this, but I just had a small correction that “C” is bounded between 0 and 1 instead of -1 and 1. The reason for this is that the way we’ve constructed our test statistic, e.g., (O-E)^2/E, it can never be negative and consequently “C” can’t ever be negative.

    This also makes intuitive sense in that the Chi-Squared Test of Independence only really states there’s no association (the null) vs. there’s an association (the alternative) and doesn’t assign the direction of that association.

    Otherwise, great piece!

    Reply
    • Fred Schenkelberg says

      April 1, 2020 at 9:56 AM

      Thanks for the note and the article is updated now

      Cheers,

      Fred

      Reply
  2. Bharati says

    November 22, 2022 at 12:38 AM

    How to find the maximum value of coefficient contengecy for 6*6 contengecy table?

    Reply
    • Fred Schenkelberg says

      November 22, 2022 at 7:59 PM

      Hi Bharati, not sure I understand the question. The value calculated from the data is used to determine if there are dependencies within the dataset. If the data has strong or many dependencies, I support the value would be rather high, something to experiment using simulated data to check, I suppose. cheers, Fred

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CRE Preparation Notes

Article by Fred Schenkelberg

Join Accendo

Join our members-only community for full access to exclusive eBooks, webinars, training, and more.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Get Full Site Access

Not ready to join?
Stay current on new articles, podcasts, webinars, courses and more added to the Accendo Reliability website each week.
No membership required to subscribe.

[popup type="" link_text="Get Weekly Email Updates" link_class="button" ]

[/popup]

  • CRE Preparation Notes
  • CRE Prep
  • Reliability Management
  • Probability and Statistics for Reliability
  • Reliability in Design and Development
  • Reliability Modeling and Predictions
  • Reliability Testing
  • Maintainability and Availability
  • Data Collection and Use

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy