Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site
Prep notes for ASQ Certified Reliability Engineer exam ISSN 2165-8633
The idea of the CRE Preparation Notes series is to provide you short practical tutorials on all the elements that make up the ASQ CRE body of knowledge. The articles provide introductionary material, basics, how-to’s, examples, and practical use guidance for the full range of reliability engineering concepts, terms, tools, and practices.
Keep your knowledge fresh with regular review of topics and tools that make up reliability engineering.
Sign up for the CRE Preparation Notes email list to receive weekly reliability engineering short tutorials.
- Improve your reliability engineering skills
- Learn about the wide range of tools available
- Enhance your resume with the ASQ CRE
You will find the most recent tutorials in reverse chronological order below. Below each article is the section and specific clause of the CRE Body of Knowledge that tutorial addresses. Click on those tags to find other articles on the same topic. To the right on the sidebar, there is a listing of the 7 major categories in the body of knowledge - it's a quick way to find groups of articles on each specific area. You can also use the search function to locate articles, podcasts, or tutorials on specific topics.
A contingency table, as in the chi-squared test of independence, reveals if two sets of data or groups are independent or not. It does not reveal the strength of the dependence. The contingency coefficient is a non-parametric measure of the association for cross-classification data. [Read more…]
The chi-square ( $- \chi^2 -$) test provides a means to determine independence between two or more variables. In this case, it works for count data.
Contingency table or row and column (r x c) analysis are other common names for this analysis. It is useful when comparing results from different treatments or processes. [Read more…]
Here’s an overview of a distribution-free approach commonly called the Kaplan-Meier (K-M) Product Limit Reliability Estimator.
There are no assumptions about underlying distributions. And, K-M works with datasets with or without censored data. We do need to know when failures or losses (items removed from the evaluation or test other than as a failure. Censored items). [Read more…]
Just opened registration for a CRE preparation course. http://fmsrel.com/1hW57Yt
Starting in August and running through September. All online.
Recently I participated in an ASQ CRE focus group with a few of our peers. The ASQ facilitator prompted each of use to answer a few questions. Then she asked each of us to contribute to a “Start, Stop, Change” exercise focused on the CRE exam.
It appears ASQ is starting another round of reviews and possible updates to the CRE Body of Knowledge and exam process. That is good. [Read more…]
This is a non-parametric test to compare ranked data from three or more groups or treatments. The basic idea is to compare the mean value of the rank values and test if the samples could are from the same distribution or if at least one is not.
The null hypothesis is the data from each group would receive about the same mean rank score. We are comparing rank values, not the actual values. [Read more…]
This non-parametric analysis tool provides a way to compare two sets of ordinal data (data that can be rank ordered in a meaningful manner). The result, rs, is a measure of the association between two datasets.
You may want to know if two reviewers have similar ratings for movies, or if two assessment techniques provide similar results. [Read more…]
Let’s say we have data that is only rank order from two or more evaluators (people, algorithms, etc.) and we want to determine if the evaluators agree or not.
The agreement here meaning the results from one person or another are in agreement, or they are concordant. This is typically done with this non-parametric method for 3 or more evaluators. For a comparison of two evaluators consider using Cohen’s Kappa or Spearman’s correlation coefficient as they are more appropriate. [Read more…]
Detecting a change or difference is often the aim of an experiment or set of measurements. We want to learn which vendor, process, or design provides a better result.
When we use a sample to estimate a statistic for a population we take the risk that the sample provides values that are not representative of the population. For example, if we use a professional basketball team to sample men’s height. We may conclude that the height of men in the general population is taller than the true population value. [Read more…]
The U test permits the comparison of two samples to determine if they came from the same population or not. This non-parametric test can use ordinal data, meaning it is in some rank order without containing information about relative distances between ranks. [Read more…]
A test to determine if the homogeneous Poisson model (HPP) is applicable given the data from an individual system is subject to the non-homogeneous Poisson model (NHPP).
This is an alternative test to using the Kendall-Mann Reverse Arrangement Test. [Read more…]
When something fails, what should we do?
A natural question when something fails is
Why did it fail?
The answer is not always obvious or easy to sort out.
One of my favorite examples was on a circuit board that had a small burn mark where a component exploded off the board. The customer didn’t notice that missing part, our engineering team did that. [Read more…]
With any product development, there is a risk the features (benefit) come along with inherent dangers (risk). For example, a desktop computer includes the need for electrical power. Done improperly a person exposed to wall current and voltage could be seriously harmed. While unlikely the risk exists. [Read more…]
One approach for reliability improvement is to find the weaknesses or faults, then fix them.
This is best done before shipping to the customer.
You may hear this called the Test, Analyze, and Fix Method (TAAF). Or, you may have heard of it called a Reliability Growth Test program (RGT). Either way, the essence is evaluating prototypes to find specific faults. [Read more…]
Testing a new design is expensive and takes time to accomplish. During the design, process engineers make assumptions across many decisions. Unknown interactions and unanticipated events may lead to product failure.
Finding design weaknesses early in the design process permits the team to address and correct problems. [Read more…]