Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

Customer Reliability Expectations Change

Customer Reliability Expectations Change

Image that. Customers say one thing and expect something else.

A customer may provide a detailed and complete reliability specification, then, 6 months into using the product complain it is not reliable enough.

They want the device to

  • Last longer
  • Have more features (and cost less)
  • Survive harsher environments
  • Operate more often
  • Fail less often

Maybe we need a fifth element to the reliability definition. The expectation will increase over time.

The demand to create more reliable products will continue.

Product family after product family has seen the pattern of increasing expectation around reliable performance.

Understanding customer expectations

Whether part of the customer requirements or ascertained via surveys, the process to define what customers actually want concerning reliability is difficult.

Customers often do not know what they really want till they have the product and experience its reliability performance.

Even then your customers may not be able to articulate what they really want beyond, “make it more reliable.”

In the process to understand your customer’s reliability objectives, include a bit of forward-looking consideration.

Increase the reliability targets for your products a bit beyond your customer’s initial desires, if possible.

This has the benefit of adding a little margin over the initial expectation, plus provides a little room into the future to meet the unstated increased reliability expectation.

Customers rarely desire something that is less reliable.

Setting reliability goals

The reliability goal for your product has for elements:

  • Function
  • Environment
  • Probability
  • Duration

When setting the goal for the internal specifications, consider all four elements.

Increase the goal for each just a bit to help your team design a product that meets the current and future reliability expectations.

 

Function – include the ability to evaluate and monitor via reliability testing as many functional elements as possible.

This includes the primary core functions, of course, plus, the secondary functions such as color fastness of the enclosure.

The ability to evaluate the risks and measure reliability performance over time requires understanding how every function may fail.

Even a minor functional failure may taint your customer’s perception of the reliability performance.

 

Environment includes two parts.

First the weather or the surrounding conditions affecting your product. This is more than temperature and humidity. Include stress factors that may cause acute or systemic paths to failure.

A drop of sufficient height may shatter your product, yet a modest vibration may degrade the performance over time.

Both are important to consider.

One technique to catalog all the environmental stresses is to image a ‘day-in-the-life’ of your product.

Power, weather, radiation, insects, etc. Each has a means to destroy your product.

Another element of environment is the duty cycle of your product.

Some products are in service a few times a day, while others have a full-time duty cycle. Even the full-time systems my experience different loads during the day (causing cycling damage).

Consider how the loading and the operating time may increase in different situations.

 

Probability and duration should be set in pairs and either or both may require increases to meet future expectations.

If your product reliability goal includes an initial requirement to be at least 95% reliable over 1 year, you may expect customers will quickly require 98% reliable over 2 years.

Life testing and modeling are already difficult, now I’m suggesting you consider increasing your targets.

It will only pay dividends as your customer expectations increase in the near future.

Summary

Reliability expectations are a moving target.

Use the concept of windage to aim a bit higher to accommodate the shifting nature of your customer’s expectations. Aim higher.

Have you been surprised by your own or your customer’s reliability expectations?

Have you had the conversation around that current product meets the old requirements, and now we want more reliability?

Share your experience in the comments section. Let’s share how the process of goal setting actually works.

More content on the topic of changing reliability expectations

SOR 187 Customer Reliability Expectations Change Over Time (podcast)

Adjusting to Customer Expectations Changing (article)

Filed Under: Articles, CRE Preparation Notes, Reliability Management Tagged With: Customer Needs Assessment

About Fred Schenkelberg

I am the reliability expert at FMS Reliability, a reliability engineering and management consulting firm I founded in 2004. I left Hewlett Packard (HP)’s Reliability Team, where I helped create a culture of reliability across the corporation, to assist other organizations.

« The 3 Best Reasons to Use MTBF
Corrosion in Agitated Conditions »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CRE Preparation Notes

Article by Fred Schenkelberg

Join Accendo

Join our members-only community for full access to exclusive eBooks, webinars, training, and more.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Get Full Site Access

Not ready to join?
Stay current on new articles, podcasts, webinars, courses and more added to the Accendo Reliability website each week.
No membership required to subscribe.

[popup type="" link_text="Get Weekly Email Updates" link_class="button" ]

[/popup]

  • CRE Preparation Notes
  • CRE Prep
  • Reliability Management
  • Probability and Statistics for Reliability
  • Reliability in Design and Development
  • Reliability Modeling and Predictions
  • Reliability Testing
  • Maintainability and Availability
  • Data Collection and Use

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy