Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Mike Sondalini Leave a Comment

Decoding the ISO 55001 Asset Management Standard – Understanding ISO 55001 Clauses

Decoding the ISO 55001 Asset Management Standard – Understanding ISO 55001 Clauses

Understanding ISO 55001 clauses is vital for building a compliant ISO 55001 Asset Management System. Understanding ISO 55001 clauses is easy with a logical flowchart.

The meaning of the contents in the ISO 55001 asset management standard must be correctly interpreted and properly addressed in your asset management system

To fully understand the implications of an ISO 55001 clause, it is necessary to strip each sentence, phrase, and sub-point down into its logical elements

Learn how to turn the text in an ISO 55001 clause into a logical flowchart that lets you fully appreciate the implications and build the correct application in your asset management system.

Understanding ISO 55001 clauses can be difficult. To build a ISO 55001 compliant asset management system (AMS) you must satisfy the intentions in ISO 55001 asset management requirements. The meaning of the text in ISO 55001 can seem like a secret code you must first break. Even the ISO 55002 asset management guidelines are often not particularly helpful.

For example, take ISO 55001 clause 6.1 in Section 6, Planning, noted below. What do the sentences and sub-points mean? What must you specifically do in your asset management system to fully comply with the clause and sub-points?

6 Planning

6.1 Actions to address risks and opportunities for the asset management system

When planning for the asset management system, the organization shall consider the issues referred to in 4.1 and the requirements referred to in 4.2 and determine the risks and opportunities that need to be addressed to:

— give assurance that the asset management system can achieve its intended outcome(s);
— prevent, or reduce undesired effects;
— achieve continual improvement

The organization shall plan:

a) actions to address these risks and opportunities, taking into account how these risks and opportunities can change with time;

b) how to:

— integrate and implement the actions into its asset management system processes;
— evaluate the effectiveness of these actions.

There is a simple text decoding method that you can use to tease-out the meanings in the clauses of the ISO 55001 asset management standard. The technique uses a logic flowchart to understand the intentions described within a clause of ISO 55001.

When you read any ISO55001 clause, you can identify three types of content:

1) a processing requirement (i.e. do something),
2) an input into the process (i.e. get information, history, or data), and
3) an output from the process (i.e. do actions; create something; or provide information, history or data).

The figure below is an example logic flowchart used for understanding ISO 55001 clauses. It shows a logical breakdown of ISO 55001 Clause 6.1. Each individual processing requirement indicated in Clause 6.1 and its sub-points, is put on separate notelets in red hand-printing. These are sequentially ordered to create a logical process. Every notelet is a process step to complete for ISO 55001 compliance. The inputs mentioned in the clause are put above the process steps. These are shown on the adhesive notes with blue hand-printing and tagged with the word Input and an inward facing arrow. The outputs from a process step are in the underside notelets in black hand-printing and tagged with the word Output and an outward pointing arrow.

Figure 1: Decoding ISO 55001 Clauses Sample Logic Flowchart

The red printing on each notelet in the core process are the words used in Clause 6.1. Each Input is either stated in the Clause, or it is implied by the logical necessities of the core process. Each Output is either stated in the Clause, or it is implied by the logical necessities of the core process.

Putting this flowchart together for ISO 55001 Clause 6.1 took nearly an hour.

When you develop your ISO 55001 AMS, you need to address each adhesive note’s comments. By satisfying what is written on a note you will be complying with ISO 55001.

Once you have a clear understanding of what you must do to comply with ISO 55001 asset management requirements, then ISO 55002 asset management guidelines becomes a much more useful document.

Flowcharting ISO 55001 clauses is a forgiving approach. You may accidentally leave out an input or an output or even a process step. But the flowcharted process must logically mimic all that is written in the clause, so when you cross-match the ISO 55001 text to its applicable notelet you will easily spot if you have a gap in the logic, or if you missed a consideration, and correct it. Turning words into an image and proof-checking the logic is the ideal ACE 3T standard operating procedure solution.

Photograph your flowcharts and keep a copy of the workings done to comply with the requirements for each process step, each input, and each output—they are evidence that you planned your asset management system and took into consideration everything asked of you in ISO 55001.

Filed Under: Articles, Life Cycle Asset Management, on Maintenance Reliability

About Mike Sondalini

In engineering and maintenance since 1974, Mike’s career extends across original equipment manufacturing, beverage processing and packaging, steel fabrication, chemical processing and manufacturing, quality management, project management, enterprise asset management, plant and equipment maintenance, and maintenance training. His specialty is helping companies build highly effective operational risk management processes, develop enterprise asset management systems for ultra-high reliable assets, and instil the precision maintenance skills needed for world class equipment reliability.

« Equipment Experts Couldn’t Believe Response
How to Reliably Design for a Single Point of Failure »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Headshot of Mike SondaliniArticles by Mike Sondalini
in the Life Cycle Asset Management article series
articles provided with permission of Plant Wellness Way EAM and Lifetime Reliability Solutions

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • test
  • test
  • test
  • Your Most Important Business Equation
  • Your Suppliers Can Be a Risk to Your Project

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy