Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by nomtbf Leave a Comment

Difference between hazard and failure rate

I too have found these terms used interchangeable in many papers and references.
(This note is in response to a question on a forum asking about the difference between these two terms. The question prompted some interesting discussion and no clear resolution as various authors and authoritative works do not seem to agree.

Therefore, I highly recommend you define these terms with those you converse.

While I do not have a definitive source for the difference, I have this working understanding The hazard rate is a function and is the function that describes the conditional probability of failure in the next instant give survival up to a point in time, t. h(t) =  f(t) / R(t).

Thus hazard rate is a value from 0 to 1. Failure rate is broken down a couple of ways, instantaneous failure rate is the probability of failure at some specific point in time (or limit with continuos functions.

It is the chance of failure calculated by h(t) for a specific t. Failure rate can also be an average chance of failure over some period of time – not as precise yet very commonly used. I try to avoid this as it presumes a constant failure rate over the duration. And, some don’t even provide the duration and simply state a failure rate per hour, for example.

Well, over which group of hours ( like  a year ) does this rate apply? Failure rate as the count of failures per unit time, and can be a value greater than one. For example, 2 failures per year, or a 200% annual failure rate.

Given the number of different ways to interpret the term failure rate, I suppose we should careful. My definitions may not clear up any confusion, it’s just the way I think about these terms. cheers, Fred http://creprep.wordpress.com/2011/09/20/the-four-functions/

Filed Under: Uncategorized

« Early Reliability Problems in the News
Statistical Process Control Overview »

Comments

  1. Joe says

    March 22, 2017 at 5:25 PM

    Help. I am a student and trying to understand the following book problem.

    h(t)= 0.0005(2 + 4t + 2^1.5)

    a. what is the reliability at t=5000h
    b. what is the mean time to failure for this system?
    c. What is the expected number of failures in 1 year of operation.

    I am going round and round and the text does not cover this very well Can you help?

    Reply
    • Fred Schenkelberg says

      March 22, 2017 at 6:05 PM

      Hi Joe,

      Sure, you have a hazard function and need the reliability function to answer a. See https://lucas-accendo-site-speed.sprod01.rmkr.net/2011/09/20/the-four-functions/ to see the relationships between functions.

      The MTBF is basically the time, say a year, divided by the number of failure over a year.

      I’ll leave c. for you to sort out.

      Cheers,

      Fred

      Reply
  2. Maverick says

    January 10, 2018 at 2:44 AM

    Respected sir,
    I am a student of industrial engineering. I am working on a problem of finding reliability function and hazard rate function of an assembly.
    I am provided only with dates of failure of the assembly and not of individual parts.

    can i do censoring of the failure data ?

    Reply
    • Fred Schenkelberg says

      January 10, 2018 at 9:02 AM

      Hi Maverick – censoring is a feature of the data meaning that some of the assemblies haven’t failed yet. So, if you have 10 assemblies operating, and 4 have failed, and you have the time to failure data for those four, that is the failure data, the remaining 6 assemblies have not failed, and they provide the censored data.

      Censored data is unrelated to whether you have component, assembly, or system level data.

      hope that helps.

      Cheers,

      Fred

      Reply
  3. Marc says

    May 29, 2020 at 2:51 PM

    “The hazard rate is a function and is the function that describes the conditional probability of failure in the next instant give survival up to a point in time, t. h(t) = f(t) / R(t).
    Thus hazard rate is a value from 0 to 1.”

    I have a doubt on this. Taking the exponential random variable with parameter L, we get h(t)=L. But L can exceed 1. So how can this necessarily be a probability?

    Reply
    • Fred Schenkelberg says

      May 31, 2020 at 2:02 PM

      Hi Marc, L is value that represents a rate, an instantaneous probability of failure – thus is between 0 and 1 – if you take the inverse 1/lambda = MTBF… MTBF is the inverse of a fraction -thus greater than one. Or, maybe I’m missing something here. cheers, Fred

      Reply
      • Marc says

        May 31, 2020 at 7:37 PM

        Hmm, I think we must have differing definitions of the exponential distribution. The definition I’m acquainted with, the same as that on Wikipedia, requires that L (i.e., lambda) be positive but not necessarily less than 1. And using the formula f(t) / R(t) on this distribution, once derives a hazard function that is constantly L.
        How do you define an exponential random variable?

        Reply
  4. S.K. says

    June 29, 2022 at 7:09 AM

    Haven’t you faced here the difference between probability density distribution (pdf) and cumulative density distribution (cdf) and failure rate function?
    Reference: https://www.reliasoft.com/products/weibull-life-data-analysis-software/the-risks-of-using-failure-rate-to-calculate-reliability-metrics

    Reply
    • Fred Schenkelberg says

      June 29, 2022 at 7:17 AM

      Thanks for the note S.K. I had not seen that article over at reliasoft. good stuff

      cheers,

      Fred

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

[popup type="" link_text="Get Weekly Email Updates" link_class="button" ]

[/popup]

The Accendo Reliablity logo of a sun face in circuit

Please login to have full access.




Lost Password? Click here to have it emailed to you.

Not already a member? It's free and takes only a moment to create an account with your email only.

Join

Your membership brings you all these free resources:

  • Live, monthly reliability webinars & recordings
  • eBooks: Finding Value and Reliability Maturity
  • How To articles & insights
  • Podcasts & additional information within podcast show notes
  • Podcast suggestion box to send us a question or topic for a future episode
  • Course (some with a fee)
  • Largest reliability events calendar
  • Course on a range of topics - coming soon
  • Master reliability classes - coming soon
  • Basic tutorial articles - coming soon
  • With more in the works just for members
Speaking of Reliability podcast logo

Subscribe and enjoy every episode

RSS
iTunes
Stitcher

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about podcasts and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Dare to Know podcast logo

Subscribe and enjoy every episode

RSS
iTunes
Stitcher

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about podcasts and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Accendo Reliability Webinar Series podcast logo

Subscribe and enjoy every episode

RSS
iTunes
Stitcher

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about podcasts and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • test
  • test
  • test
  • Your Most Important Business Equation
  • Your Suppliers Can Be a Risk to Your Project

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy