Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Katie Switzer 2 Comments

Eight Ways to Keep Reliability Engineers From Leaving

Eight Ways to Keep Reliability Engineers From Leaving

A topic that often comes up lately is high turnover, especially the perception that this is common and desirable among millennials. Born in the mid eighties, I am right on the cusp between millennial and Generation X, and I am one of the aforementioned employees with a high turnover history. A specialized Reliability Engineer with nearly ten years of work experience, I have rarely stayed with a company much over two years. I never intended to be a person who moved between companies so regularly, it just kind of happened. 

Here are some symptoms of the problem, or reasons why employees like me might leave:

  1. Higher pay far beyond the typical 3% annual wage increase;
  2. Increased likelihood of getting a promotion to a higher pay grade;
  3. Unsatisfying company culture;
  4. Lack of challenging work;
  5. Company does not value or invest in professional development;
  6. Better work-life balance;
  7. Changes in their family situation;
  8. Improved benefits.

If you look at the data, there is a single root cause why skilled employees like me come and go: companies don’t make it worth it to stay. I’m not really sure why this is, because it is so expensive to replace outgoing employees with special skill sets like Reliability.

For example:

Outgoing Employee Costs

An outgoing employee will cost you extra money. Time spent on administrative costs like exit interviews by HR and payroll changes might be around $1,000 . Then you have to pay them unused vacation, which might total about 2 weeks pay (~$8,000). Estimated outgoing employee cost would then be about $9,000.

Incoming Employee Costs

Typical costs for hiring a new employee might include things like administrative costs, recruiter fees, training, and the cost to pay an employee during their initial training phase. This adds up quickly. Let’s assume for this thought experiment you are trying to replace a $100,000 salaried engineer.

Administrative costs might cover the overhead for an HR employee to perform the work (5 hrs X $50/hr = $250), the cost of travel for the interview itself ($2,000), and the time spent by several interviewers (5 hrs X $75/hr = $375). Also, you must include the costs of a drug test and background check, estimated cost of $2,000. Total administrative costs of $4,625.

Recruiter fees for a $100,000 employee might be around $30,000.

Sign on bonus and relocation estimated at $50,000.

Training costs might be about $5,000 in the first year. This would include internal training, and at least one off-site technical course to get them up to speed. You might also want to add in a conference, so people in your industry can get to know the new engineer, so add another $4,000 just to be sure. Total for training would then be about $9,000.

Training time opportunity loss would be at least four weeks of time that the new employee is not useful. This is pretty conservative; a lot of estimates would put this at as much as a year. Using salary alone and not added benefits, this cost would be approximately $8,500. I’ll round it up to an even $10,000 to include some of the company’s benefit costs.

This brings our total out to:

Outgoing Employee + Admin Costs + Recruiter Fees + Sign On and Relo + Training + Training Time = Total Cost of New Employee

$9,000 + $4,625 + $30,000 + $50,000 + $9,000 + $10,000 = $112,625

All of this leads up to one final truth: you are losing money if you aren’t retaining employees. A lot of money. The costs are quite high. The reasons employees might leave are numerous, and it would be overwhelming to try to address them all.

Just for fun, let’s look at the typical cost to train a new Reliability Engineer. I’m going to estimate about five years to get really good, plus all the training.

Five Years Of Salary: $65,000 + $66,950 + $68,958 + $71,027 + $73,158 = $345,000

Just kidding, these salaries are WAY too low. By five years, a skilled Reliability Engineer should be making more like $85,000. This is a good example of why you are not retaining your Reliability Engineers at a 3% annual raise.

Let’s try that again. To achieve $85,000 by year five, you would need to account for a 7% salary increase per year:

Five Years of Salary: $65,000 + $69,550 + $74,416 + $79,628 + $85,202 = $373,798

Your newly minted Reliability Engineer will also need a lot of training to get to the right level. By year five, a Rotating Equipment Reliability Engineer would be expected to be at least an ISO Cat II Vibration Analyst, Level II Machinery Lubrication and Online Monitoring Training. You should also plan for at least one conference per year.

Vibration Training + Lubrication Training + Online Monitoring Training + Five Years of Conferences = $$$

($1,700 + $350 + $1,900 + $400) + ($1,300 + $1,300) + ($2,300) + ($10,000) = $19,250

So, to summarize, if you can hire a new graduate and spend five years training them as a Rotating Equipment Reliability Engineer, you will end up investing around $400,000 in them. That’s no small change.

Instead of contributing to the churn and wasting money training employees for your competitors, look at the root cause of why employees are leaving: It’s because companies don’t make it worth their while to stay. So instead of trying to address each individual cause, you can either improve your exit interview process to determine which are the biggest factors and address them one-by-one, or develop a unique package that makes a company special enough that employees want to stay.

Some Things That Can Be Done To Better Retain Reliability Engineers:

  1. Improve engagement to make their activities valued;
  2. Provide challenging and rewarding work activities;
  3. Keep abreast of company culture (and act like you care);
  4. Provide financial or professional development incentives for employees to stay longer than two years;
  5. Be up-to-date on competitive salaries and benefits;
  6. Give management support and resources to Reliability activities;
  7. Don’t ask for absurd amounts of unpaid overtime, focus on the quality of work performed and not the quantity of hours an engineer spends on site;
  8. Show appreciation by acknowledgement and feedback.

Do you have any ideas or experience with how to retain skilled technical employees? Please share them below!

Filed Under: Advanced Engineering Culture, Articles, on Leadership & Career Tagged With: Business, Employment, engineer, Human Resource Management, reliability engineer, reliability engineering, Salary, Skilled Employees, Turnover, workplace

About Katie Switzer

Katie Switzer is a Reliability Engineer and ISO Category III Vibration Analyst who works with plant operations and maintenance to improve their equipment uptime and reduce maintenance costs. Katie specializes in rotating equipment Predictive Maintenance program development, and has worked in several industries including nuclear power, aerospace and chemical manufacturing.

« Mathematical Models, Algorithms, and Risk Management Methodologies
Why Market Requirements Don’t Really Exist »

Comments

  1. James Karl says

    June 1, 2018 at 7:33 AM

    So true.

    I can’t wait to leave my present employer. There is no understanding of reliability or predictive maintenance, only complaints about engineering costs to maintain the programs. All training has been squashed. Professional certification is discouraged.

    I took over some programs about 1.5 years ago. In the beginning, the testing efficiency was 10%. Now it is close to 90%. More equipment has been caught, before it ran to failure, than in the last 20 years.

    I’ve educated people about what I do but the higher levels of management want to shut my programs down. The ignorance is depressing. On top of that, I’m working through a severe , painful physical handicap, so it is no fun being here.

    In general, Ann Arbor is very parochial, backward and has a run-to-failure culture. The Troy area in Michgan is a better area for reliability professionals.

    No one should stay in one place if they are wasting their time (I’ve been here 13 years).

    You will never master the craft if you don’t move around. I’ve learned the hard way that specific regions of the U.S. are more receptive to reliability principles than other regions. Millennials, you have the right idea..

    Reply
  2. Sherry Gajos says

    July 20, 2018 at 11:29 AM

    I really love what you said about ways to retain reliability engineers, like improving your engagement to make their activities valued. My husband works with many engineers and wants to have a good relationship with them so they are more likely to want to work with him. Thank you for the ideas about making sure you provide them with challenging and rewarding work activities as well not asking for absurd amounts of unpaid overtime.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Articles by Katie Switzer
in the Advanced Engineering Culture series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • test
  • test
  • test
  • Your Most Important Business Equation
  • Your Suppliers Can Be a Risk to Your Project

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy