Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by nomtbf Leave a Comment

Exposing a Reliability Conflict of Interest

Exposing a Reliability Conflict of Interest

Is Your Organization Compromising Reliability Performance Due to a Reliability Conflict of Interest?

Kirk Gray wrote the article titled Exposing a Reliability Conflict of Interest on Accendo Reliability. He talked about a recent article discussion the maintenance costs for the F-35 fighter jet program and how the companies designing the system make a significant profit selling spare parts or maintenance services.

If you count on the profit from the system you design failing, you have an inherent conflict of interest concerning creating a reliable system.  If you create a reliable product you lose money.

Not Just a Problem for Military Suppliers

The problem Kirk described is not just with military projects. The reliability conflict of interest arises anytime the team designing an item profit from spares or maintenance services.

With extended warranty contracts, the better the reliability performance of a product the more profitable the extended warranty contracts become. In contrast if your organization generates profit when an item fails by providing spares or maintenance services, there is little incentive to improve reliability.

For military project there are typically cost plus type arrangements which effectively cap the profit the organization can generate performing design and development services. On the other hand, once the system is fielded, if the same organization is the sole provider of spares or maintenance services, they really can and do charge to create significant profit.

For example, if you have a product idea one common approach is to engage a firm that can design and build your product. If they are also the organization that provides spares, repairs, and warranty management, they create a profit from those action only when the product they designed is un-reliable.

Another example is a repair service. If they make money when doing a repair independent if it actually works or not, there is little incentive to actually fix the problem. The more times they see the same item, the more often they invoice for ‘repair’ services.

Check the contracts and systems you have concerning your products. These reliability conflicts of interest may be hampering your ability to create reliability products for your customers.

One Idea to Squash this Conflict of Interest

In the discussions and comments around Kirk’s article on Accendo Reliability and Linkedin one idea from Andy caught my attention. Andy suggests:

Contract should be for the useful operational hours of the equipment, purchase them on a lease basis with the supplier responsible for the OEE, that would concentrate their minds! — Andy Gailey

If you want a reliable product contract for a reliable product. There are real costs to un-reliability that far outweighs the costs associated with repairs or servicing. Building in suitable terms to balance the incentives toward creating a durable solution is possible.

When a design team has a bonus based on time to market or a procurement team has a bonus based on cost reductions, the emphasis on reliability general suffers. Including a factor based on field reliability performance within the bonuses changes the focus to include the impact on reliability performance.

For state of the art military aircraft the functional performance is critical. Yet, if it will take 3 aircraft to insure mission success because two are in the shop for repairs, the functionality focus is out of balance with the aircraft’s mission.

Creating reliability systems is economically sound for your customers and your business. Identifying and eliminating (or at least balancing incentives) reliability conflicts of interest in service to the warfighter and your customers.

Next Steps to Resolve a Reliability Conflict of Interest

  1. Identify reliability conflicts of interest
  2. Create a plan to eliminate the conflict or at least balance the incentives by including reliability performance elements
  3. Create reliable products
  4. Help others to stop using MTBF (had to throw that in, even if not related.)

What has worked for you to expose and reduce reliability conflicts of interest? Use the comments section below and share your success stories so others can make progress as well.

 

Filed Under: Uncategorized

« The Philosophy of Effective FMEAs – Part 2
Knowledge Based Decisions »

Comments

  1. Viswanatha says

    August 2, 2017 at 8:51 PM

    How do you define concept reliability and can be implemented for a new product development (NPD).

    From
    Viswanatha
    Sr. Reliability Engineer

    Reply
  2. Andy Gailey says

    March 10, 2018 at 3:54 AM

    Many thanks for the quote Fred Schenkelberg
    This unfortunately is prevalent in industry especially with ‘trusted’ equipment rebuilders.
    Previously had experience of pressing them for evidence of failure modes, photographic evidence etc
    In the end I asked for all used parts replaced to be sent back with the units, they were very reluctant to do this and yes there were repeated failures that up to then everyone lived with.
    They eventually got the message when we started to go back to OEMs

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

[popup type="" link_text="Get Weekly Email Updates" link_class="button" ]

[/popup]

The Accendo Reliablity logo of a sun face in circuit

Please login to have full access.




Lost Password? Click here to have it emailed to you.

Not already a member? It's free and takes only a moment to create an account with your email only.

Join

Your membership brings you all these free resources:

  • Live, monthly reliability webinars & recordings
  • eBooks: Finding Value and Reliability Maturity
  • How To articles & insights
  • Podcasts & additional information within podcast show notes
  • Podcast suggestion box to send us a question or topic for a future episode
  • Course (some with a fee)
  • Largest reliability events calendar
  • Course on a range of topics - coming soon
  • Master reliability classes - coming soon
  • Basic tutorial articles - coming soon
  • With more in the works just for members
Speaking of Reliability podcast logo

Subscribe and enjoy every episode

RSS
iTunes
Stitcher

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about podcasts and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Dare to Know podcast logo

Subscribe and enjoy every episode

RSS
iTunes
Stitcher

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about podcasts and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Accendo Reliability Webinar Series podcast logo

Subscribe and enjoy every episode

RSS
iTunes
Stitcher

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about podcasts and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • test
  • test
  • test
  • Your Most Important Business Equation
  • Your Suppliers Can Be a Risk to Your Project

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy