Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Fred Schenkelberg 2 Comments

General Human Factors Design Principles

General Human Factors Design Principles

People build, transport, use, maintain and dispose of equipment or products.

Thus the creation of these items should include consideration of the humans involved. In order to fully benefit from the functional capability of an item or system, we, as humans, have to interact with an item’s interface, displays, sounds, etc.

Whether a smartphone or bottling machine, the ability to provide commands or direction, the ability to recognize and understand responses, and the ability to correctly identify faults or outputs all combine to permit humans to place calls or fill juice bottles.

It is in the design stage that the elements of a piece of equipment (hardware or software) thwart or enable efficient human interaction.

According to the FAA (Human Factors Design Standard: For Acquisition of Commercial Off-The-Shelf Subsystems, non-developmental Items, and Developmental Systems, by Vicki Ahlstrom, and Kelly Longo, DOT/FAA/CT-03/05 HF-STD-001, May 2003, Chapter 2) the following principles apply for the design or selection of systems or equipment:

Basic Design Elements

Make the System Durable — the equipment has to operate and be maintained within the expected set of conditions (environmental and use conditions)

Allocate Functions Appropriately — consider the differences between what the human or the equipment may accomplish given the performance requirements for sensitivity, precision, time, and safety. Consider factors of cost and skill level for both maintenance and operation.

Test with users — actual users in a realistic environment

Make the system reliable — the item should function over time in a specified environment with a specific probability of success in order to maximize availability.

Design for Simplicity — the design and interface should be as simple as possible while consistent with human-machine system interaction.

Minimize training — operation and maintenance activities should require only minimal familiarization and training to operate or maintain properly.

Make Functions Obvious — the equipment should not present puzzles or hidden controls for fundamental functionality.

Consistency

Make the Design consistent —this includes the appearance, behavior, and response through the system

Be Consistent with User mental Model — key to minimize training, employ an analogy with real life objects, employ conventions from similar systems, and follow patterns from previous operational experiences.

Minimize Inconsistency — on occasion it may be necessary to break consistency to support a specific task or function. Avoid using novel or unique approaches or mental models.

Standardization

Standardize hardware and software — specifically for the use of common user interfaces across buttons, dials, displays, colors, and related schemes.

Maintain Identical Interfaces for Identical Functions

Make Controls, Displays Marking, Coding, Labeling, and Arrangement Uniform

Make Appearance Distinctive — if the function is different that appearance should be different

Standardize Terminology, Look, and Feel

Make Functionally Similar Equipment Interchangeable

Make Functionally Different Equipment Non-Interchangeable

Safety

Incorporate Safety Factors — use an appropriate system and personal safety factors including those that minimize human error under normal, degraded, or emergency conditions and under adverse environments.

Provide a fail-safe design

Make Systems Error Resistant — as much as possible

Make Systems Error Tolerant — if it’s possible for a human to make an error, he will, thus the equipment should be detected, mitigated, or at least be resilient to possible human errors.

Warn of Potentially Unsafe Actions — before initiating a task that may have serious consequences

Identify Safe and Unsafe States and Actions — for example clearly identify danger posed by bypassing safeguards when troubleshooting or maintaining the system

Provide Emergency Procedures for Critical Systems — a clear step by step description of what to do in the event of a failure

Provide Redundancy — specifically for the access to the systems and equipment that provide a critical function

Design systems to be Modular — for ease of replacement and return to operation

Provide Warning Labels — increase awareness to avoid damage during equipment handling, installation, operation or maintenance.

Prevent Misalignment and Improper Mounting — include physical features that preclude improper mounting or alignment

User-Centered Perspective

This involves focusing on the needs and requirements of the end user throughout the design acquisition, or development process.

Provide Timely and Informative Feedback

Provide Predictable Results to User Actions

Use Familiar Terms and Images

Maximize Human Performance — foster effective procedures, work patterns, and personnel safety

Minimize Training Requirements

Design to Meet User Requirements

Minimize User Actions — specifically user hand and eye movements

Facilitate Transfer of Skills — this is from one experience to another based on consistency and standardization.

Design for 5th ago 95th percentile — of human physical characteristics, such as height, strength, perception, etc.

Accommodate Physical Diversity — this accounts for the myriad of human characteristics which do not imply a tall person will have a long reach, for example. While often not feasible to create a design that functions efficiently for everyone, it should at least accommodate for everyone to safely and efficiently perform their tasks.

Design to Accommodate People with Disabilities

Provide Enough Flexibility for different User Skill Levels

Maximize User Subjective Satisfaction

Support

Provide Help

Maintenance

Design for Common Tools

Make Systems Easy to Maintain

This is just a quick summary of the principles and supporting points. To learn more about these principles and more about human factor design guidelines, download the Ch2 General design requirements (PDF) or view the full document online.


Related:

Human Factor Considerations (article)

Comparing Human and Machine Capability (article)

Safety Factor (article)

 

Filed Under: Articles, CRE Preparation Notes, Reliability in Design and Development Tagged With: Human Factors

About Fred Schenkelberg

I am the reliability expert at FMS Reliability, a reliability engineering and management consulting firm I founded in 2004. I left Hewlett Packard (HP)’s Reliability Team, where I helped create a culture of reliability across the corporation, to assist other organizations.

« Electronics Failure Analysis Done the Right Way
How Six Sigma Can Help You? »

Comments

  1. Steven Melander says

    August 13, 2016 at 6:50 PM

    Very nice write-up. My human factors reference has always been MIL-STD-1472. Steven.

    Reply
    • Fred Schenkelberg says

      August 14, 2016 at 7:30 AM

      Hi Steven, thanks and I wasn’t aware of the standard you mention. It is complete and detailed. It could easily be adapted for most any industry. Here’s a link to the download page. MIL-STD-1472

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CRE Preparation Notes

Article by Fred Schenkelberg

Join Accendo

Join our members-only community for full access to exclusive eBooks, webinars, training, and more.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Get Full Site Access

Not ready to join?
Stay current on new articles, podcasts, webinars, courses and more added to the Accendo Reliability website each week.
No membership required to subscribe.

[popup type="" link_text="Get Weekly Email Updates" link_class="button" ]

[/popup]

  • CRE Preparation Notes
  • CRE Prep
  • Reliability Management
  • Probability and Statistics for Reliability
  • Reliability in Design and Development
  • Reliability Modeling and Predictions
  • Reliability Testing
  • Maintainability and Availability
  • Data Collection and Use

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy