Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Fred Schenkelberg 2 Comments

Kaplan-Meier Reliability Estimator

Kaplan-Meier Reliability Estimator

Here’s an overview of a distribution-free approach commonly called the Kaplan-Meier (K-M) Product Limit Reliability Estimator.

There are no assumptions about underlying distributions. And, K-M works with datasets with or without censored data. We do need to know when failures or losses (items removed from the evaluation or test other than as a failure. Censored items).

 

K-M provides an estimate for the reliability function or CDF. K-M is a non-parametric method. It is conservative and not defined beyond the last point of data, failure or loss.

Calculation K-M estimates

Use the following steps to calculate K-M estimates:

  1. Order the actual failure times from t1 through tr, where there are r failures.
  2. With each ti, pair with the number ni, with ni equal to the number of operating units just before the i-th failure occurred at time ti.
  3. Estimate R( t1) by (n1 – 1) / n1
  4. Estimate R(ti) by R( ti – 1) × (ni – 1) / ni
  5. Estimate the CDF F(ti) by 1 – R( ti)

Note: For censored units only count them up to the last actual failure time before the were removed.

A Simple Example

Let’s say we have 20 units on test for 200 hours. 6 have failed at times 10, 32, 56, 98, 122, and 181 hours. Plus four units were removed for other experiments at 50, 100, 125, and 150 hours. The remaining 10 units ran until the test ended at 200 hours.

Step 1. Order the times to failure.

ti Failure time
1 10
2 32
3 56
4 98
5 122
6 181

Step 2. Count surviving units just prior to failure at ti

Remember to remove censored units (losses) at next failure time.

ti Failure time ni
1 10 20
2 32 19
3 56 17
4 98 16
5 122 14
6 181 11

Step 3. Estimate R(t1)

$$ \large\displaystyle R\left( {{t}_{1}} \right)=\frac{{{n}_{1}}-1}{{{n}_{1}}}=\frac{19}{20}=0.95$$

Step 4. Estimate each R(ti)

Where

$$ \large\displaystyle R\left( {{t}_{i}} \right)=R\left( {{t}_{i-1}} \right)\times \frac{{{n}_{i}}-1}{{{n}_{i}}}$$

ti Failure time ni R(ti)
1 10 20 0.95
2 32 19 0.90
3 56 17 0.847
4 98 16 0.794
5 122 14 0.737
6 181 11 0.670

Beyond 181 hours the reliability, R, is 0.607.

Step 5. Estimate CDF if desired

Recall F(ti) = 1 – R (ti)


Related:

Censored Data and CDF Plotting Points (article)

Confidence Limits (article)

Kruskal-Wallis Test (article)

 

Filed Under: Articles, CRE Preparation Notes, Probability and Statistics for Reliability Tagged With: Non-parametric statistical methods

About Fred Schenkelberg

I am the reliability expert at FMS Reliability, a reliability engineering and management consulting firm I founded in 2004. I left Hewlett Packard (HP)’s Reliability Team, where I helped create a culture of reliability across the corporation, to assist other organizations.

« Supporting Voices on NoMTBF
Two Approaches to Reliability »

Comments

  1. luckynp85 says

    April 3, 2019 at 3:04 AM

    Hi Fred,

    One doubt.

    For 2nd failure, R(t2) = R(t2-1)*(n2-1)/n2 = 0.95*18/19 = 0.9 and not 0.947?

    Am I missing something?

    Regards,
    Laxman

    Reply
    • Fred Schenkelberg says

      April 3, 2019 at 7:33 AM

      good catch and I’ve updated the calculations

      Cheers,

      Fred

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CRE Preparation Notes

Article by Fred Schenkelberg

Join Accendo

Join our members-only community for full access to exclusive eBooks, webinars, training, and more.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Get Full Site Access

Not ready to join?
Stay current on new articles, podcasts, webinars, courses and more added to the Accendo Reliability website each week.
No membership required to subscribe.

[popup type="" link_text="Get Weekly Email Updates" link_class="button" ]

[/popup]

  • CRE Preparation Notes
  • CRE Prep
  • Reliability Management
  • Probability and Statistics for Reliability
  • Reliability in Design and Development
  • Reliability Modeling and Predictions
  • Reliability Testing
  • Maintainability and Availability
  • Data Collection and Use

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy