Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Adam Bahret Leave a Comment

Managing Up – Beyond the Analysis Numbers

Managing Up – Beyond the Analysis Numbers

Often when we request an analysis from an engineer we run with the results and don’t ask a lot of questions about the analysis itself.  Having done a lot of analysis  I am familiar with all the assumptions and estimations that go into making a calculation work.  But that means that the results of the analysis are only relevant to those assumptions and estimations.  The analyst may have to make the following “calls” without additional input or only a small fact-finding mission.

  • Remove a suspect part of the data set that appeared contaminated by a non-relevant factor or collection error
  • There is not a clear definition for how these two parts will be assembled yet and an assumption had to be made on boundary conditions
  • There is no record of if variable “C” was controlled during the experiment

So the end user, likely not the analyst, will be reporting on the results and may not have all the answers to upcoming questions coming from other parties. In many cases this is the person/team that is making a large decision and these analysis results are apart of that process.  They may even be the hinging factor.

It’s important to minimize the potential of misunderstandings and misapplication of results. From the information customer’s end this is what is needed.

  • Management teams need to understand the story behind the resultsBehind-The-Numbers
  • They need to consider the drivers behind a trend.
  • They need to consider the risks underlying their decisions today.
  • They need to look behind the numbers

This can be easily accomplished with a little work on both ends.  The analyst can create a multi-layer document that allows a user to search for details on the assumptions and estimations. This can be done in anything from Word to Excel to a custom piece of software.  The end user can do their part by taking a little time to, in advance, review the results and the reference doc.  They should confirm their understanding of both to the analyst before incorporating the results into their work.

The true end game for analysis in many cases is assisting with making decisions.  So how are decisions made?

  • The person starts with a problem – determining which college they will be attending.
  • They then look at the alternatives – the schools they can choose from.
  • Now, they decide which is more beneficial by looking at their criteria – what they believe is most important in terms of choosing a school. This can be things like, the price of the college, the location of the college, etc. Things that are important to that particular person.
  • People then compare their criteria to their alternative; they see which best fits their criteria. They see which alternative is the most beneficial for them.
  • Finally, they make a decision.

So the boundary conditions for the decision process and the analysis must match. Whose responsibility is that?  Everyone!

Looking at the big picture it becomes very clear that all parties involved with the analysis, data input, calculating, result interpretations, and final decision making are required to synchronize on the peripheral factors before, during, and after.  It’s a guaranteed “miss” if everyone assumes they are on the same page.

A little effort can go a long way with making analysis results an effective contributor in program decision making.

-Adam

 

Filed Under: Apex Ridge, Articles, on Product Reliability Tagged With: Decision-making

About Adam Bahret

I am a Reliability engineer with over 20 years of experience in mechanical and electrical systems in many industries. I founded Apex Ridge Reliability as a firm to assist technology companies with the critical reliability steps in their product development programs and organizational culture.

« Introduction to the Quality Triangle
How Not to Make Bad Risk Decisions »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Article by Adam Bahret
in the Apex Ridge series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • test
  • test
  • test
  • Your Most Important Business Equation
  • Your Suppliers Can Be a Risk to Your Project

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy