Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Fred Schenkelberg 2 Comments

The Many Ways We Use Variance

The Many Ways We Use Variance

The term variance is a statistical concept related to the spread or dispersion of a set of data. Second to the mean, it a common value we may calculate.

We find standard deviation easier to understand and use (it uses the same units as the data) whereas variance uses the units squared.

We use variance in quite a few different ways. Let’s review just a few.

We initially may calculate variance to estimate a distribution parameter. The normal distribution comes to mind here as the mean and variance are the two essential parameters.

Every other distribution of interest has a variance as well. The Weibull distribution uses the shape and scale parameters, yet it also has a mean and variance, as well. While they exist they are not all that informative.

We calculate variance by first calculating the mean of the data, then summing the square of the differences and dividing by the number of data points. Or dividing by the number of data points minus one when dealing with a sample of a population.

Once we calculate the sample variance, we often are interested in the population variance, thus calculate a confidence interval. The interval may contain the population variance with the stated confidence.

Sample size calculations rely on knowing or assuming the variance. A smaller variance results in requiring fewer samples for a given situation.

Checking Variances

When drawing samples and comparing means, we often make the assumption the variances are the same. We use a different hypothesis test comparing means if the sample variances are the same or not, for example.

The checking for homogeneity of variances can be done a few different ways. The most common is the F-test.

The F-test provides a means to compare two sets of data. An extension of the F-test is Hartley’s test for variance homogeneity, which allows us to test three or more sets of data variances.

Bartlett’s Test and Levene’s Test are non-parametric checks for homogeneity of variances. Bartlett’s Test pretty much expects the underlying data to be normally distributed. Levene’s Test is a better choice when you’re not sure the data is normal. Both are conservative and time-consuming to calculate.

In hypothesis testing even when not directly comparing variances we need to know a bit about the associated variances. Often we’re assuming the variance is known or the same. Often this is worth checking using one the methods above.

Use the Siegal-Tukey Test for Differences in Scale when the data is ordinal or interval in nature.

Using Variances

A change in variance indicates something has changed in a process creating the items being measured. We use the statistical process control and process capability tools to monitor variance changes (as well as mean shifts). For ease of manual calculations, we use an R-chart, whereas using today’s computers we can quickly calculate standard deviations directly, thus use S-charts.

One of the tenets of the 6 Sigma Design Approach is the processes are under control or stable, including the variance over time. Furthermore, we know the variance, thus the standard deviation.

Tolerance analysis is another area requiring knowledge of variance. We can use worst case, root sum squared, or Monte Carlo approaches for the calculation, all require knowing or assuming variance.

Summary

Just a quick rundown of how well you need to know variance. It’s more than just the 2nd moment of a data set, it’s also vital to hypothesis testing, proper design (tolerances), process control, and sample size selection.

There is plenty to know and with the links above plenty to read and understand. If you know another way to use variance, let me know and I’ll add to this article.

Filed Under: Articles, CRE Preparation Notes, Probability and Statistics for Reliability Tagged With: Statistical Terms

About Fred Schenkelberg

I am the reliability expert at FMS Reliability, a reliability engineering and management consulting firm I founded in 2004. I left Hewlett Packard (HP)’s Reliability Team, where I helped create a culture of reliability across the corporation, to assist other organizations.

« Don’t Stop Your RCA Investigation Too Soon
Making Walkways and Platforms »

Comments

  1. Ashram says

    March 6, 2017 at 6:53 AM

    Hi Fred
    How do you calculate steady state availability for two series components given their quantities (10) and (6) their repair times (0.8) and (2.2) and failure rates (0.000634) and (0.000222) respectively? From Quanterion

    Reply
    • Fred Schenkelberg says

      March 6, 2017 at 10:41 AM

      Hi Ashram, do you have the formula for stead-state availability? that and a series system reliability block diagram may be a great place to start.

      Maybe another reader has a direct and simply approach they can share. (I’m currently traveling and away from my references…)

      Cheers,

      Fred

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CRE Preparation Notes

Article by Fred Schenkelberg

Join Accendo

Join our members-only community for full access to exclusive eBooks, webinars, training, and more.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Get Full Site Access

Not ready to join?
Stay current on new articles, podcasts, webinars, courses and more added to the Accendo Reliability website each week.
No membership required to subscribe.

[popup type="" link_text="Get Weekly Email Updates" link_class="button" ]

[/popup]

  • CRE Preparation Notes
  • CRE Prep
  • Reliability Management
  • Probability and Statistics for Reliability
  • Reliability in Design and Development
  • Reliability Modeling and Predictions
  • Reliability Testing
  • Maintainability and Availability
  • Data Collection and Use

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy