Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Kirk Gray Leave a Comment

What do you mean that my phone is obsolete?

What do you mean that my phone is obsolete?

Reliability engineers have traditionally been asked to answer a common question during development of a new device or system, and that is “How long will it last?”.

It is the eternal question in equipment reliability development, and it really comes down to “that depends on many factors”. One question that needs to be asked is how long do you need it to, or should it last?

I have written about this question before in a previous post, “Why the Drain in the Bathtub Curve Matters” that has had many clicks from the NO MTBF and Accendo Reliability Websites. The points made in that posts were that in most cases, and especially with consumer electronics, the intrinsic wear out mechanisms in the solid-state electronics will not be a factor in its useful life: the device will be replaced due to technological obsolescence long before those mechanisms cause failure. Batteries, of course, have a limited life, and eventually will require replacement.

In the recent past, many cell phones had easily accessible consumer replaceable batteries, and allowed the user to extend the life of a phone. Today very few, if any, have easily replaceable batteries, and replacing the battery in a smartphone can be a significant cost relative to the original cost of the phone. Of course, all the smartphone suppliers know this and use it as leverage to get customers to purchase new phones.

Smartphone technology keeps improving with better cameras, as well as more robust designs, as such making the devices water-resistant, that motivates the user to upgrade to the latest model. We’ll at least that’s what Samsung, Apple, HTC, LG and all the other manufactures hope and need to keep growing in the market.

I would guess that most of the readers of this post are early adopters of new technology, and the technological cutting edge is where they want to be. Yet, technological obsolescence is difficult for some, as there is typically a learning curve with a new device, and that can be frustrating to many. My wife’s childhood BFF is one of those.

Then there are the technophobic people you may know, who want to stay with the old hardware and do not want to upgrade-EVER! My wife’s friend, let’s call her “Peggy” (to protect our friendship), is one of those. The photos of her old Nokia phone in this post here are more evidence that electronics have a long life entitlement relative to technological obsolescence. It works and she is still using it.

 2017-06-26 15.35.53  Old Nokia cell phone - still working

This Nokia phone still “works”, no need to replace

Peggy refuses to buy a new cell phone. As she told me, “My phone works fine, thank you!”. If there is such thing as an early adopter, my wife’s friend is a very late, if ever, technology adopter. She is aware of smartphones, and wants nothing to do with them. Fortunately for her, her old Nokia phone has a replaceable battery and she may be able to use it the rest of her life, if the cell phone company infrastructure supports it.

The pictures in this post and story are evidence that the intrinsic life of most electronics components is much longer than needed for most applications. In most products, we will never know what the intrinsic life actually is, as no one will be using them long enough to find out (expect maybe Peggy)

I have worked and consulted on reliability development for over 25 years and have not seen evidence that the intrinsic wear out modes in solid state electronics is a factor in field failures. The vast majority of field failures are from assignable special causes, such as design or manufacturing errors, or user misapplication and abuse and not “wear-out”, although most would say Peggy’s phone housing has worn out in the pictures. Nothing a well-placed ponytail hair scrunchie can’t fix. I think duct tape would be a better fix, but that is maybe because I am an engineer.

Most persons would be considered her Nokia to be broken, as it is obvious the chassis is quite damaged.

I do not know how much longer she can keep it together and functioning, but so far the electronics circuits are still working, it makes and receives calls, and for Peggy that is all she wants it to do.

Filed Under: Accelerated Reliability, Articles, on Product Reliability Tagged With: obsolescence

About Kirk Gray

My Passion for developing reliable products

Why did it fail?

This is the fundamental question that drove my career from first repairing electronics in the 1970’s to today. It was from this perspective that my passion for reliability engineering grew from investigating, discovering and understanding of why products fail. By starting with how electronics systems actually fail (empirical not theoretical) gave me a frame of reference to understand ways to rapidly discover failure mechanisms.

« DOE Supports World Class Quality
Mandate and Commitment to Manage Risk »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Article by Kirk Gray
in the Accelerated Reliability series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • test
  • test
  • test
  • Your Most Important Business Equation
  • Your Suppliers Can Be a Risk to Your Project

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy