Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

on Maintenance Reliability

A listing in reverse chronological order of these article series:



  • Usman Mustafa Syed — Aasan Asset Management series

  • Arun Gowtham — AI & Predictive Maintenance series

  • Miguel Pengel — Asset Management in the Mining Industry series

  • Bryan Christiansen — CMMS and Reliability series

  • James Reyes-Picknell — Conscious Asset series

  • Alex Williams — EAM & CMMS series

  • Nancy Regan — Everday RCM series

  • Karl Burnett — History of Maintenance Management series

  • Mike Sondalini — Life Cycle Asset Management series

  • James Kovacevic — Maintenance and Reliability series

  • Mike Sondalini — Maintenance Management series

  • Mike Sondalini — Plant Maintenance series

  • Andrew Kelleher — Process Plant Reliability Engineering series

  • George Williams and Joe Anderson — The ReliabilityXperience series

  • Doug Plucknette — RCM Blitz series

  • Robert Kalwarowsky — Rob's Reliability Project series

  • Gina Tabasso — The Intelligent Transformer Blog series

  • Tor Idhammar — The People Side of Maintenance series

  • André-Michel Ferrari — The Reliability Mindset series

by André-Michel Ferrari Leave a Comment

Age Related Degradation Variables – Which is the Dominant One?

Age Related Degradation Variables – Which is the Dominant One?

The concept of degradation variables

Assets typically age over time, leading to degraded performance and loss of function. Asset life models are built in order to predict future degradation patterns. Those models are based on asset degradation variables such as time or usage. Those variables could be for example, time between failures or distance covered between failures. Many assets have more than one degradation variable. In this case, it is important to define which of the multiple variables is the dominant one and will subsequently provide the Reliability Engineer with the most precise life model. 

Reliability is a probability. Specifically, the probability that a system will perform its intended function within a specified mission time and under specific process conditions. Therefore, most reliability calculations incorporate a time element as a degradation variable. Generally, when building life models, we default to using calendar time as it is more straightforward. We have had tools to easily measure elapsed calendar time for centuries now. [Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, on Maintenance Reliability, The Reliability Mindset

by Arun Gowtham Leave a Comment

Only at Scheduled On-Condition Tasks

Only at Scheduled On-Condition Tasks

The falling cost of sensors for Industrial Equipment & the popularity of AI-based solutions means that Organizational teams are defaulting to using this strategy on all their Equipment, regardless of its criticality or other effectiveness. This is a strategic error.

[Read more…]

Filed Under: AI & Predictive Maintenance, Articles, on Maintenance Reliability

by Mike Sondalini Leave a Comment

Safe Work Practice Procedure

Safe Work Practice Procedure

To Embed Safe Work Practices You Write Detailed, Strict Workplace Safety Procedures that Get World Class Job Safety

You must select OHS risk management mitigations appropriate to a job safety hazard using a formal method that delivers safe work practices.

Each task safety control will need to be developed, assessed for suitability, and recorded so it’s clear what the plan is, and how it is to be done.

In the end, there is a practically designed, completely resourced, fully scheduled, and totally sure safe work practice procedure approved for use.

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, Maintenance Management, on Maintenance Reliability

by André-Michel Ferrari Leave a Comment

Using RAM Models in Contracts

Using RAM Models in Contracts

Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability (RAM) modeling overview

The concept of Reliability Block Diagrams (RBD) is also known as Reliability Modeling or Reliability, Availability, Maintainability (RAM) analysis. With RAM models, the interaction of large, complex, and multi-layered systems can be analyzed using Monte Carlo simulation methods. This help quantify the output of the entire system with greater accuracy than other estimating tools or methods. [Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, on Maintenance Reliability, The Reliability Mindset

by Arun Gowtham Leave a Comment

Understanding Anomaly Detection (AD) with the P-F Curve

Understanding Anomaly Detection (AD) with the P-F Curve

In the previous article, P-F Curve was used to understand the Remaining useful life (RUL) of an asset. RUL can be estimated at any time during the asset’s life, but it’s opportune to calculate RUL at the time ‘t’ when the asset shows signs of an impending failure. In the P-F Curve terminology the point at which the asset shows signs of failure is called the Potential Failure Point (Pf), which can also be stated as the time of anomalous behavior. The exercise of detecting anomalous behavior is called “Anomaly Detection (AD)”.

[Read more…]

Filed Under: AI & Predictive Maintenance, Articles, on Maintenance Reliability

by Mike Sondalini Leave a Comment

The Value of Precision Quality Standards

The Value of Precision Quality Standards

When equipment working parts are operated within their precision quality standard zones, world-class reliability is guaranteed.

The figures below demonstrates the importance of setting precision quality standards to achieve outstanding equipment reliability. It comes from a conference presentation on the production equipment reliability improvement in a steel mill in Australia.

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, Life Cycle Asset Management, on Maintenance Reliability

by Nancy Regan Leave a Comment

Master the Basics

Master the Basics

Humans are often so focused on the complex, that the simple gets overlooked. Even as technology and our equipment gets more complex, we need to be firmly rooted in the basics of maintenance and reliability.

That’s one reasons why the first step of RCM is so important.

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, Everyday RCM, on Maintenance Reliability

by Arun Gowtham Leave a Comment

Understanding Remaining Useful Life (RUL) with the P-F Curve

Understanding Remaining Useful Life (RUL) with the P-F Curve

Recently, there has been an influx of Industry 4.0 companies promising their product/application would help predict the Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of a physical asset. Each uses a mix of machine learning algorithms to estimate the RUL based on the data available. This is their value proposition. But what is this ‘life’?

[Read more…]

Filed Under: AI & Predictive Maintenance, Articles, on Maintenance Reliability

by Mike Sondalini Leave a Comment

Easy Way to See Your Hidden Factory

Easy Way to See Your Hidden Factory

 This is an example of the value of identifying the variability in your business processes and removing them before spending money on new capital works. A simple production rate distribution bar chart shows you whether you have a “hidden factory” and how big it is. 

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, Maintenance Management, on Maintenance Reliability

by Miguel Pengel Leave a Comment

Maintaining Equipment Reliability Amidst Frequent Employee Turnover

Maintaining Equipment Reliability Amidst Frequent Employee Turnover

The mining industry in Australia has for some time been plagued by high turnover in its skilled maintenance workforce. The tough lifestyle and remote/regional locations are some of the main contributing causes, and have been for years, however other industries of employment offering competitive wages and a better lifestyle have in the recent years pulled the workforce from mining, leaving a void of labor numbers behind that have proved difficult to fill.

The common query, “How do I keep equipment reliability up, even with high turnover?” prompts a standardized response from most maintenance professionals – proceduralize the maintenance system to reduce variability and maintain consistent output. However, while this approach bears truth, it overlooks a substantial aspect…

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Asset Management in the Mining Industry, Maintenance and Reliability, on Maintenance Reliability

by Karl Burnett Leave a Comment

1770-1806 The Battle of Trafalgar and the Timber Crisis

1770-1806 The Battle of Trafalgar and the Timber Crisis

Ships Don’t Last Like They Used To

Robert G. Albion was a notable historian of maritime affairs. He taught at Princeton and Harvard, and was one of the US Navy’s chief historians during World War II. In one of his books, Albion examined how timber management in Britain affected naval shipbuilding and maintenance policies.

In the late 1700s, the British Empire was more dependent on the navy for power projection, home defense, and security of maritime trade. In the age of sail, the average ship life was between 10 and 20 years. In the 17th century, British naval ships lasted 25-30 years. Albion found their average service life to be only 13 years in 1771. By 1792, service life fell to 12 years. In the Napoleonic period, the lifespan fell to only 8 years.  

“The ‘life’ or duration of a ship was reckoned from the date of her launching to the time when her condition necessitated repairs as costly as the construction of a new ship.” The British determined service life by a basic level of repair analysis.

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, History of Maintenance Management, on Maintenance Reliability

by André-Michel Ferrari Leave a Comment

The “Bath Tub” Curve Explained

The “Bath Tub” Curve Explained

Introducing the “Bath Tub” curve concept

In the Reliability and Maintenance world, we often refer to what is known as the “bathtub” curve and ask the question: “What is the bathtub curve for this equipment?” The name “bathtub” comes from the equipment failure rate curve resembling a sanitary bathtub’s longitudinal section. In reality, it is rarely symmetrical and looks more like a distorted “u” or “v” shaped figure. The bathtub curve can be useful in various circumstances and help an operator better manage their assets over time. However, it is important to understand where it comes from and what it means so we can avoid misusing or misinterpreting it.

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, on Maintenance Reliability, The Reliability Mindset

by Arun Gowtham Leave a Comment

What gets Monitored, gets Measured, gets Improved

What gets Monitored, gets Measured, gets Improved

Proponents of the Continuous Improvement method often quote the dictum ‘what gets Measured, gets Improved’. I’d like to modify it by adding ‘what gets Monitored…’ to its beginning. Here I’m referring to the Monitoring of the physical assets in their usage conditions and being Measured & Improved for their Reliability (Availability %, Cost $, MTBF, etc.) and Safety metrics.

[Read more…]

Filed Under: AI & Predictive Maintenance, Articles, on Maintenance Reliability

by Mike Sondalini Leave a Comment

How to Use Ben Franklin’s Distribution Curves for Performance Monitoring

How to Use Ben Franklin’s Distribution Curves for Performance Monitoring

 Use Ben Franklin’s Distribution Curves for Performance Monitoring and Fast Improvement. Ben Franklin used statistical analysis to change his life. By measuring his ‘gaining of Virtue’ he quickly became rich and famous. You can change your business performance in the same way. But be cautious – Franklin’s method changed his behaviour forever.

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, Life Cycle Asset Management, on Maintenance Reliability

by Nancy Regan Leave a Comment

Manufacturer Recommended Maintenance

Manufacturer Recommended Maintenance

Should you implement the manufacturer’s recommended maintenance schedules? Not without sanity-checking them first.

Be sure you consider your operating environment, which the manufacturer is unable to do.

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Articles, Everyday RCM, on Maintenance Reliability

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • …
  • 74
  • Next Page »

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • test
  • test
  • test
  • Your Most Important Business Equation
  • Your Suppliers Can Be a Risk to Your Project

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy