Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

The Perfect Strength and Stress Concepts

The Perfect Strength and Stress Concepts

Recently Peter Stuttard asked if I knew of a reference for the perfect strength and perfect stress concepts. I didn’t and asked for a bit of explanation of the phrases.

Here is his reply (via Linkedin, btw a great tool to get and stay in touch) posted with permission with minor formatting edits.

To learn more about Peter check out his Linkedin profile.


Fred

Thanks for responding so quickly, the concepts of Perfect Strength and Perfect Stress are related to your discussion re Parts Count and Parts Stress predictions and reading this on your web site prompted me to ask you about them.

I would not claim to be a ‘true’ reliability or maintainability engineer as we (Aspîre) generally address R&M from a support engineering perspective. However we do rely quite heavily on R&M techniques in both our consulting tasks (ILS, LSA, RCM, Complex System Modelling, etc) and in the support engineering training that we provide. During our training courses I do try to make the delegates aware of the nature of the measures that we use, and some reliability engineering basics such as the impact of redundancy in term of operation reliability and basic or technical reliability. Topics such as this are good for getting people to think about the issues rather than merely rote learning.

I sometimes touch on the concepts of “Perfect Stress” and “Perfect Strength”, they are particularly good for getting the delegates thinking because they challenge conventional thinking.

The concept of Perfect Strength counters the idea (for electronic equipment) that additional complexity will reduce reliability. Whereas the concept of “Perfect Stress” counters the idea of that building in redundancy will increase reliability. Neither concept is “absolute” however.

The logic is simple, but bear in mind that I am remembering something I read a fair few years ago.

Perfect Strength

Taking Perfect Strength first, the argument is that if circuits are designed so as to be sufficiently robust to survive any predictable, reasonable, stresses applied to them, i.e. if they are strong enough to take the stress, then it makes little difference how complex the overall system is, it will withstand all normal stresses applied to it. A simple analogy is to consider a structural system instead of electronics, e.g. a bridge, no one would consider that the likelihood of a road failing would increase if we diverted it over two bridges rather than one, because each bridge is designed to take a full load of traffic. This logic counts against the use of the Part Count and Parts stress methods of course.

Perfect Stress

The Perfect Stress argument takes more or less the opposite view, i.e. if a stress of such magnitude is applied to system that it will damage or destroy it, having a redundant system (subject to the same stress) will deliver no benefit whatsoever, because it too will be damaged or destroyed. (This presumes that there is no effective ‘load sharing’). A simple example, was an experience I had many years ago, back in the days of the fax modem. A nearby lightning strike had destroyed the fax modem, I thought I was OK because I had a multifunction printer, with a built in fax function that I could use instead. However, the lightning strike had destroyed that as well of course.

Summary

These simple examples are extreme cases, but the concept must apply at lower levels, for examples a dirty electrical power supply could degrade both a primary system and an active redundant system equally if they were not properly protected. On the contrary, the same dirty power supply would have no effect, no matter how many components were in the system, if that system was designed so as to be able to withstand power fluctuations and spikes.

I hope this makes sense, you may of course be well aware of these concepts, but using different terminology.

PS No joy with Google Scholar… [ed. I had suggested searching for a reference using Google Scholar]

Regards

Peter


 

So, what do you think? Have you heard of these concepts? Do you know of a reference that discusses these concepts? Drop a comment here or get in touch with Peter and let him know your thoughts.

Related Articles

ESS & HASS – Accendo Reliability

The Stress – Strength Concept in Practice

Filed Under: Articles, Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics, on Product Reliability Tagged With: Stress Strength Analysis

About Fred Schenkelberg

I am the reliability expert at FMS Reliability, a reliability engineering and management consulting firm I founded in 2004. I left Hewlett Packard (HP)’s Reliability Team, where I helped create a culture of reliability across the corporation, to assist other organizations.

« The MTBF Estimation Wizard
The Bridge to Self Improvement »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Article by Fred Schenkelberg
in the Musings series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • test
  • test
  • test
  • Your Most Important Business Equation
  • Your Suppliers Can Be a Risk to Your Project

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy