Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • CMMSradio
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Asset Performance
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Hero
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Breaking Bad for Reliability
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • The RCA
      • Communicating with FINESSE
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Hardware Product Develoment Lifecycle
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Special Offers
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
      • FMEA Introduction
      • AIAG & VDA FMEA Methodology
    • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction
      • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
    • Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
Home » Episode » Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast » 250 – Decoding Mechanical Failures with Shane Turcott

by James Kovacevic Leave a Comment

250 – Decoding Mechanical Failures with Shane Turcott

Decoding Mechanical Failures with Shane Turcott

We’re glad to have Shane Turcott to helps us understand more about decoding mechanical failures. He’s a principal metallurgist from Steel Image and is heavily involved in a lot of professional societies. Shane’s previously worked at a steel mill, a turbine company, and a failure analysis lab specializing in failure analysis. Steel Image was established in 2009 and deals with failure analysis, with a specialty in supporting reliability efforts in the refining industry, mining, energy, and heavy industries like automotive and manufacturing.

Today, we’re tackling important points such as:

  • What is Fractography
  • How to study failed components
  • Difference between a Ductile and Brittle fracture
  • How to become successful with Decoding Mechanical Failures

… and so much more!

What is Fractography?

Fractography is the science of examining fracture surfaces. When a part or metal cracks, how that crack leaves behind very distinctive features. By examining the crack features, you can find out how and why the part failed. That includes information on:

  • How and why the part failed
  • Where the crack starts from
  • The nature of loading responsible for failure
  • Clues on whether there are material or manufacturing defects

These are useful in an RCA, helping to determine the root cause of the failure.

 

Why study the failed component?

To solve a problem, you have to understand it. When a part fails, that failed piece of equipment has the most amount of information on why it failed. If you don’t analyze it, you’ll only be guessing how the part failed.

 

How to study failed components

There are two stages to this. The first is that every time a part fails, you’ll send a professional to examine the scene to get information. While talking about Fractography, it’s essential to note a gap in that stage since you could be looking more at the actual crack or fracture surface.

After triage, you can send it to a laboratory, which is the second stage. There’s a lot of lab-based equipment that gets used. These help to provide more physical evidence as to how and why a part failed.

 

What you can use for a visual examination

A lab staffed with trained experts will always be able to provide the most amount of information possible. However, a lot of RCAs are being completed without having access to lab support. So, if all you have is visual examination, you can still get a lot of information, with a bit of training, from studying those failed parts. In many cases, that information will prove useful in the RCA.

 

Main Mechanical failures with Metallurgic components

There are three main types. These are:

  1. Ductile overload – this is when a ductile material gets accidentally overloaded.
  2. Brittle – similar to glass shattering
  3. Fatigue – cracking that occurs over many loading cycles.

 

Ductile failure

Most of the metal used in structures and equipment tend to be ductile steel, which helps them absorb energy. When steel fails, it becomes a safety issue. So, one of the best clues of ductile overload is deformation. If you have a permanent shape change in the vicinity of failure, like stretching, elongation, necking, bending, twisting, or buckling, that’s a good sign that the part has had loading beyond its functional strength. Another pointer is that you may also notice a dull and fibrous fracture appearance that contrasts very well. Lastly, if you have enough tension in your failure, you’ll form 45-degree shear lips around your fracture surface.

 

Difference between a Ductile and Brittle fracture

These are both overload failures, but they occur due to different reasons. Steels used in structures and equipment are often selected because they’re ductile. Therefore, if it fails in a brittle manner, you have an issue very different from a failure due to ductile overload. So, for a successful RCA, you need to be able to determine that it’s brittle based on your examination of the fracture. After your diagnosis, you need a clean and systematic approach to identify what are the factors that caused a ductile material to fail in a brittle manner.

There are two primary categories of what causes brittle failures:

  1. Embrittlement phenomenon – during manufacture or service, something made your ductile steel permanently brittle.
  2. Environmental conditions – by exposing ductile steel to cold temperatures, it can become brittle.

These are also referred to as circumstantial factors. So, if you have a sharp notch, cold temperature, and impact the material very quickly, you can change a ductile material into a brittle state.

 

What is Fatigue failure?

Compared to the other failure modes, fatigue provides the most amount of information about how and why a component failed. It occurs from cyclic or repetitive loading, and the crack initiates and grows across. You can identify it through features like:

  • Having a clearly defined initiation and crack progression, followed by the final ligament to fail or the final failure.
  • Having crack arrest marks, also called beach marks.
  • Having ratchet marks radiating from the initiation site, and tend to be smoother.

With a bit of training, all these things can help you identify that a failure was caused by fatigue. It can also give you a lot of clues as to where that loading source came from. Fatigue on steel only occurs if you exceed the fatigue limit, meaning your cyclic loading equipment must always stay below that limit. A fatigue diagnosis in the RCA will lead you to ask whether you passed the fatigue limit or the material was too weak. To determine this, you’ll use the clues on the fracture surface.

 

Do you need special equipment to analyze these failures?

There’s a lot of information you can get in the field or close to the field. The primary step is just using your eyes to examine. You can also get affordable tools like:

  • A stereomicroscope, which gives a magnification of 5 – 30 times.
  • A magnifying glass

However, it would be best if you focused on finding where the crack starts, and having magnification tools will provide you with more information.

 

How important is the preservation of failed parts?

It’s essential since it offers information on experienced failure. So, create a culture of repairing and keeping failed parts. Also, be smart about how you keep that part so that when you need information on it, it’s still in good condition.

 

Other Mechanical failure modes

There are four different families of failure modes:

  1. Mechanical – ductile, brittle, fatigue
  2. Wear issues
  3. Corrosion issues
  4. High temperature – for parts experiencing high temperatures like boilers

Some of these modes need more complex equipment to examine, but you still get a significant amount of information from a visual examination.

 

How to become successful with Decoding Mechanical Failures

Never rush Fractography and examining a failed part. If you’re not sure about something, take a day or two to sleep on it before coming back to it. Examine the failure area and everything on it. Do not develop tunnel vision on some of the most prominent concerns. Also, take your time with the examination until you’re comfortable with the outcome.

 

Why isn’t Fractography included in the reliability engineering curriculum?

Strangely, people get trained to investigate failures without including the skill set of looking at the failed part or the fracture surface. These are questions that organizations like SMRP that train and certify reliability engineers need to look at. It could be because, in the past, there were no resources for examining failed parts.

 

How to learn more about Fractography from skilled professionals

People need to hold, examine, and learn by using failed parts. Steel Image offers a course that inundates those who attend with several failures. These help them get very good at looking at broken parts and doing mock failure analyses.

 

Eruditio Links:

  • Eruditio
  • HP Reliability
  • James Kovacevic’s LinkedIn
  • Reliability Report

Shane Turcott Links:

  • Steel Image
  • Shane Turcott LinkedIn
  • Decoding Mechanical Failures
  • Decoding Mechanical Failures Course
  • SMRP.org
Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
250 - Decoding Mechanical Failures with Shane Turcott
Loading
00:00 /
RSS Feed
Share
Link
Embed

Download filePlay in new window

Download RSS iTunesStitcher

Rooted In Reliability podcast is a proud member of Reliability.fm network. We encourage you to please rate and review this podcast on iTunes and Stitcher. It ensures the podcast stays relevant and is easy to find by like-minded professionals. It is only with your ratings and reviews that the Rooted In Reliability podcast can continue to grow. Thank you for providing the small but critical support for the Rooted In Reliability podcast!

Filed Under: Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast, The Reliability FM network

About James Kovacevic

James is a trainer, speaker, and consultant that specializes in bringing profitability, productivity, availability, and sustainability to manufacturers around the globe.

Through his career, James has made it his personal mission to make industry a profitable place; where individuals and manufacturers possess the resources, knowledge, and courage to sustainably lower their operating costs.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Rooted in Reliability podcast logo

The plant performance podcast

image of James Kovacevic
by James Kovacevic


Subscribe and enjoy every episode
Google
Apple
Spotify

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about podcasts and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy