Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
    • About Us
    • Colophon
    • Survey
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • CMMSradio
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Asset Performance
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Hero
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • NoMTBF
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • ASQR&R
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Maintenance Management
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • RCM Blitz®
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Breaking Bad for Reliability
      • Field Reliability Data Analysis
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability by Design
      • Reliability Competence
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
      • Reliability Knowledge
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • The RCA
      • Communicating with FINESSE
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Institute of Quality & Reliability
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Statistical Methods for Failure-Time Data
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Hardware Product Develoment Lifecycle
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Special Offers
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Glossary
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinar Sources
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • Your Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Live Courses
      • Introduction to Reliability Engineering & Accelerated Testings Course Landing Page
      • Advanced Accelerated Testing Course Landing Page
    • Integral Concepts Courses
      • Reliability Analysis Methods Course Landing Page
      • Applied Reliability Analysis Course Landing Page
      • Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, & Regression Modeling Course Landing Page
      • Measurement System Assessment Course Landing Page
      • SPC & Process Capability Course Landing Page
      • Design of Experiments Course Landing Page
    • The Manufacturing Academy Courses
      • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Statistics
      • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
      • Quality Engineering Statistics
      • FMEA in Practice
      • Process Capability Analysis course
      • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
      • Return on Investment online course
    • Industrial Metallurgist Courses
    • FMEA courses Powered by The Luminous Group
      • FMEA Introduction
      • AIAG & VDA FMEA Methodology
    • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction
      • Barringer Process Reliability Introduction Course Landing Page
    • Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • How to be an Online Student
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home
Home » Podcast Episodes » Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast » 251 – How to Make a Good Request with Fred Schenkelberg

by James Kovacevic Leave a Comment

251 – How to Make a Good Request with Fred Schenkelberg

How to Make a Good Request with Fred Schenkelberg

We’re glad to have Fred Schenkelberg back to help us understand how to make a complete request. A lot of times, emails circulate through the organization requesting tasks to get completed. However, they don’t define the:

  • Who
  • When
  • How

Fred will give us insight on:

  • Elements of a Complete Request
  • Do the five elements help ensure a significant change in making requests

… and so much more!

This topic ties into the discussion of change management and culture within the organization. A complete request is there to remove ambiguity by assigning responsibility and a timeline to the team members. There’s also the aspect of:

  • What tasks do you want me to do?
  • What are we doing?
  • Why do I need this information?
  • Why is it important?
  • What level of quality or degree of completeness?
  • Do I need an answer, result, or report?

Vague requests like, “Could you look into why line two has got so many failures” can get interpreted in several ways. You’ll ask a few operators, come up with an explanation, and send a quick email. However, if you ask questions like, “Is there a different maintenance program, set of equipment, or is it aging differently?” you’ve made an extremely different request that will get more tailored answers.

 

Elements of a Complete Request

There are a total of five elements. The first two are who’s making the request and who’s the recipient of the request. These may seem trivial, but they’re worth being explicit about in the long term.

The third element is what the request is. Rather than saying something vague like, “Look into,” you need to be more specific by saying something like, “Analyze the reasons for the downtime increase over the last six months.” What’s the specific question, task, or activity that you expect that person to do?

That question always needs to be coupled by when, which is the fourth element. Do not request someone to perform a task when they have the time. If the person is not interested in that subject, chances are they won’t make time for it. You need to stipulate the day, date, and time to guarantee the message has been passed in its entirety.

The last element is, “To do what quality?” Do you need a report with citations and documentation of all thought processes and all the data, or do you need a phone call that gives a summary? What level of detail and depth of information is needed for the request to be satisfied? Basically, how do you know when you’re done?

 

What happens next?

When you have all the five elements in place, then you can send out an email. If any of those five elements are not clear to both parties, then you’ll get a disconnect with your request.

If you’re receiving the request, you need to pay attention to what you’re being asked to do. Ask questions like:

  • Am I the one receiving this?
  • Are you the one asking this?
  • Do I need to provide the answer to you or someone else?
  • What exactly do you mean by “Looking into.”?

Each of these criteria can get probed to get more specifics to ensure you have a complete request.

If the person providing the request goes through all five elements, there’s still room for discussion about:

  • What’s the nature of this task?
  • What are the criteria?
  • What toolset are you saying I should use?
  • What data set?

You can open the discussion in a much more meaningful way about, “What exactly you want me to do, by when? And what’s the context for this? How specific does this need to be? Is this just a rough engineering guess, or do you need a detailed Ph.D. thesis?”

 

Do the five elements help ensure a significant change in making requests?

Yes, they do. Everyone on the floor starts adopting the elements to their day-to-day requests. And whenever there’s a request that can’t be fulfilled, it becomes noticeable immediately so that different terms can be discussed and agreed on early. These changes also get based on the five elements.

 

In summary

It’s important to note that this change takes time to adopt and that leadership needs to be involved fully in the process. However, the more frequently you use it, the faster it becomes the organization’s culture. That’s because your team gets a constant reminder of what the five elements are. In addition to that, they get to practice when and how to use them. It changes the nature of how people communicate, which translates to great value for the organization.

 

Eruditio Links:

  • Eruditio
  • HP Reliability
  • James Kovacevic’s LinkedIn
  • Reliability Report

Fred Schenkelberg Links:

  • 7 Essential Elements to a Complete Request
  • Fred Schenkelberg Linkedin
  • Accendo Reliability
  • Speaking of Reliability Podcast
  • Past Fred Schenkelberg Episodes
Image of Fred Schenkelberg taken in 2024
Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
251 - How to Make a Good Request with Fred Schenkelberg
Loading
00:00 /
RSS Feed
Share
Link
Embed

Download filePlay in new window

Download RSS iTunesStitcher

Rooted In Reliability podcast is a proud member of Reliability.fm network. We encourage you to please rate and review this podcast on iTunes and Stitcher. It ensures the podcast stays relevant and is easy to find by like-minded professionals. It is only with your ratings and reviews that the Rooted In Reliability podcast can continue to grow. Thank you for providing the small but critical support for the Rooted In Reliability podcast!

Filed Under: Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast, The Reliability FM network

About James Kovacevic

James is a trainer, speaker, and consultant that specializes in bringing profitability, productivity, availability, and sustainability to manufacturers around the globe.

Through his career, James has made it his personal mission to make industry a profitable place; where individuals and manufacturers possess the resources, knowledge, and courage to sustainably lower their operating costs.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Rooted in Reliability podcast logo

The plant performance podcast

image of James Kovacevic
by James Kovacevic


Subscribe and enjoy every episode
Google
Apple
Spotify

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about podcasts and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy

Book the Course with John
  Ask a question or send along a comment. Please login to view and use the contact form.
This site uses cookies to give you a better experience, analyze site traffic, and gain insight to products or offers that may interest you. By continuing, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn how we use cookies, how they work, and how to set your browser preferences by reading our Cookies Policy.