Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by James Kovacevic 2 Comments

Designing for Reliability: The First Step in Reliability

This episode is about designing for reliability. It has been proven over time that the best inventions are designed properly after planning them and before implementation — even in the earlier times people used to draw things before they actually made them. After you have done an analysis of the equipment, there is not even close to good probability to make that product completely reliable. That is why a good design should be made before developing anything for which companies hire professional designers and good ones have their own designing teams too.

But where should a person start to know about this designing phase of the products he is using? Even good OEMs always have this done to make the construction easy and they test the smaller units under different context to check the issues in functionality. So, the organizations first need to know all the activities that can lead to a good reliability program along with a reliable product. That is how they know that what could possible wrong and then design for that failure or defect to make it better over time.
There are some steps that can be followed at least to get a knowhow about successfully predicting the behavior or lifetime of the equipment with specifications and limitations of it. Of course, general ones are to define, identify, analyze, improve, validate, and monitor and control but this is how you can perform them.

  • The very first thing companies can do is to contact the OEMs for the basic knowledge of the design of the equipment or check the Reliability Block Diagrams if they are available.
  • They can also have their own designing teams but they need to know for sure about the limitations, failures and downtime of the equipment so that they can plan for it when something goes wrong.
    Then they can make the improvements depending upon their own requirements for better working of the equipment.
  • Designing for reliability is not just an activity, it’s a whole process where you not only need to do the calculations which will lead to having reliable products but you also need to know that how to achieve that planned reliability.
  • This practice should be applied right after planning and during the whole designing phase. Then it should be integrated into all of the other processes to get the best results at all times.
  • DFR leads to quality, helps in testing any assumptions during the development phase while doing analysis and reliability growth. That is how the warranties are provided to the buyers and the quality is improved based on these previous test results.

So, data analysis like Weibull or any other statistical technique to predict the variations and errors is pretty good. But even proven analysis methods like Failure Mode and Effect Analysis can’t guaranty a reliable product. That is why designing for smaller units, testing them helps in making improvements with the time that we need in our equipment. This helps to have a better reliability program, saves time and money, and gives proactive experiences in the field.

 

References:

  • The Basics of FMEA
  • Effective FMEAs
  • Design Paradigms

 

27 – Designing for Reliability: The First Step in ReliabilityJames Kovacevic
  • Social:
  • Link:
  • Embed:
http://episodes.reliability.fm/rir/rir-s01e27-designingforreliabilitythefirststepinreliability.mp3
Download RSS iTunesStitcher

 

Rooted In Reliability podcast is a proud member of Reliability.fm network. We encourage you to please rate and review this podcast on iTunes and Stitcher. It ensures the podcast stays relevant and is easy to find by like-minded professionals. It is only with your ratings and reviews that the Rooted In Reliability podcast can continue to grow. Thank you for providing the small but critical support for the Rooted In Reliability podcast!

Filed Under: Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast, The Reliability FM network Tagged with: design, Design for Reliability, James Kovacevic, reliability, RIR, Rooted In Reliability

About James Kovacevic

James is a trainer, speaker, and consultant that specializes in bringing profitability, productivity, availability, and sustainability to manufacturers around the globe.

Through his career, James has made it his personal mission to make industry a profitable place; where individuals and manufacturers possess the resources, knowledge, and courage to sustainably lower their operating costs.

Comments

  1. Hilaire Perera says

    November 15, 2016 at 4:22 PM

    Although Six Sigma and Design For Six Sigma (DFSS) have been quite successful in achieving higher quality, reducing variation and cutting down the number of non-conforming products, the methodologies are primarily focused on product quality and many organizations are starting to realize that they do not adequately support the achievement of high reliability. Therefore, these organizations are starting to put more emphasis on the separate, although often complementary, techniques of Design for Reliability (DFR).

    Design for Reliability guidelines include the following:
    • Design based on the expected range of the operating environment.
    • Design to minimize or balance stresses and thermal loads and/or reduce sensitivity to these stresses or loads.
    • De-rate components for added margin.
    • Provide subsystem redundancy when possible.
    • Use proven component parts & materials with well-characterized reliability.
    • Reduce parts count & interconnections (and their failure opportunities).
    • Improve process capabilities to deliver more reliable components and assemblies

    Reply
    • James Kovacevic says

      November 15, 2016 at 6:29 PM

      Hello Hilaire,

      DFR is a great concept, but it is not widely adopted. If more organizations would use DFR, the availability of the plants would be dramatically increased. The DFR often pays for itself very quickly once the total cost of downtime avoidance is calculated.

      James

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Maintenance & Reliability series


by James Kovacevic
High Performance Reliability

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • test
  • test
  • test
  • Your Most Important Business Equation
  • Your Suppliers Can Be a Risk to Your Project

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy