Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Michael Pfeifer, Ph.D., P.E. 1 Comment

Product reliability and Materials Engineering

Product reliability and Materials Engineering

This article is the first in a series about material engineering and product reliability. The intent of the article is to provide you with a basic understanding of product reliability as viewed through the eyes of a material engineer. When I first talk to engineers who have a different background or focus, I start with the basics. As we speak more, I expand into relevant areas one at a time. That is what I hope to do with this series. Introduce you to some basics, and then move on to a deeper dive into the topic.

When considering product reliability, a materials engineer is concerned with how the materials in components respond when exposed to stressors that can cause the materials to degrade. Stressors include mechanical loads, corrosive environments, chemicals, heat and cold, electricity, and radiation. You may find additional stressors based on the environment components are used in, or how they are used. It’s a problem if a component or joint in a product degrades to the point where it stops functioning as required.

As a materials engineer, I am concerned with more than just product reliability. For product design, I must consider performance, reliability, and cost of components and joints. This means looking deeper than just how materials respond to stressors.

In this first article in the series, I will discuss the component and joint design process, the two pillars of product design, and a common approach to product design. There will also be a brief overview of materials engineering. Future articles will focus on reliability.

Finally, since I’m a metallurgical engineer my focus is on metals and coatings. Future articles will cover metals, but the discussion in this article applies to all materials – metals, polymers, ceramics, and new materials that don’t fit neatly into the three categories.

Product design

Companies try to design products that meet certain performance and reliability requirements at the lowest possible cost. Since any product is an assembly of components, whether this goal is achieved depends on each component meeting its performance and reliability requirements, and whether they can be fabricated at the lowest possible cost.

An example of the components in a product are the components in a bicycle crank.

Performance requirements describe the attributes a component must have to function as required.  The attributes are described in terms of mechanical, electromagnetic, thermal, optical, physical, chemical, electrochemical, and cosmetic properties. For example, strength, electrical resistance, and mass. Performance requirements include mechanical loads that must be supported, electrical current that must be carried, and cosmetic appearance.

Reliability requirements describe the stressors to which a component will be exposed, the time length of exposure, and the expected response of the component’s materials. Examples of stressors cyclic stresses, wear, high temperatures, and salt water (corrosion). A component fails when the material degrades to the point where the component no longer functions as required.

The discussion also applies to weld, solder, and braze joints between components. But for ease of writing, the discussion will only mention components.

Two pillars of component performance, reliability, and cost

The performance, reliability, and cost of any component depend on two things:

  • Component form. This includes component shape, dimensions, and features.
  • Component materials. For metals, this includes alloy, process for making stock metal or fabricating a component, heat treatment, and coatings.


For any component, both form and materials can be engineered when a component is being designed. This includes making trade-offs between component form and materials to optimize its design to meet the performance and reliability requirements at the lowest possible cost.

Engineering the materials means considering different types and grades of materials, coatings, how stock materials (sheet, plate, powder,…) are produced, components fabrication process, and heat treating to achieve the desired properties and attributes in the component being designed

For example, consider a component machined from a steel bar. One option might be to use cold-drawn carbon steel to meet the mechanical requirements. Or, it might be possible to use hot-rolled alloy steel bar and heat treat the component after fabrication to get the desired mechanical properties. It’s also important to consider ease of machining, ease of heat treating, reliability, and cost when selecting the alloy, steel mill processing, fabrication, and heat treatment.

Common approach

However, engineering component form and materials does not happen at many companies. Instead, engineering teams focus on engineering component form, and to a large extent, overlook engineering the materials.

This happens because many companies don’t have materials engineering expertise on staff. Instead, mechanical engineers are expected also to be materials engineering experts. That’s not realistic. While they are good, capable engineers, they don’t have materials engineering training or experience, or the materials engineering perspective.

So, when designing a new product that is an iteration of a current product, designers often select the same metals used in the current product. If it’s a completely new product, design engineers often only consider and select materials familiar to them. In both cases, there can be problems if the performance and reliability requirements of the component being designed differ from past products, and the materials selected are not suitable for the new application.

The potential problems are component reliability issues that delay product launch and result in customer returns. Also, in both cases, since the options of materials considered is restricted, opportunities are missed to reduce costs and innovate better components by considering different materials.

What is materials engineering?

Materials engineering is the application of materials science to engineering decisions and problems. Materials science is concerned with the relationship between a material’s properties, its composition and microscopic structures, and the manufacturing processes used to make components, stock materials like metal bar or plastic sheet, and form joints between components. For metals, microscopic structures include grains and phases, both of which and have a big impact on metal properties. Just because they can’t be seen with the naked eye doesn’t mean they can be ignored.

Understanding materials science makes it possible to leverage it to engineer the materials used in components. As mentioned earlier, engineering the materials means considering different types and grades of materials, coatings, how stock materials (sheet, plate, powder,…) are produced, components fabrication process, and heat treating for the purpose of achieving the desired properties and attributes in the component being designed.

Fabrication and joining properties are also important

Keep in mind that properties related to performance and reliability are not the only important properties. Ease of fabrication and joining are also important. Selecting materials that make component fabrication difficult results in higher costs due to special handling and quality problems.

Leveraging materials engineering

Being able to leverage materials engineering enables design of products that meet performance and reliability requirements at low cost, and with fewer problems during product testing and manufacturing. Sometimes it results in designs not thought to be possible.

The next article will discuss component design and how materials engineering fits in.

  Ask a question or send along a comment. Please login to view and use the contact form.

Filed Under: Articles, Metals Engineering and Product Reliability, on Product Reliability

About Michael Pfeifer, Ph.D., P.E.

I’m a metallurgical engineer with over 25 years of experience working on product design, manufacturing, and root cause analysis.

Most engineers think of metallurgists only for failure analysis of component failures. While I do that, I also help design teams with component design. I help select alloys and coatings that have the corrosion, fatigue, wear, and creep properties needed to meet reliability requirements. Oftentimes, trade-offs are required between component form and materials to optimize a design for performance, reliability, and cost. I help do that, too.

« Bivariate Reliability Estimates from Survey Data
Great Communications – A Matter of Time? »

Comments

  1. Larry George says

    December 5, 2021 at 4:38 PM

    Thank you for starting the series on materials reliability. It needs updating. I have used Kececioglu’s Weibull fits for common materials, but that’s old, and Weibull may not be justified.
    I have had a bicycle crank failure!
    I look forward to more articles, because my next article will be on multivariate reliability models of the form P[Stress > strength] or P[g(Stress, strength) = fail] when stresses and strengths are multivariate, dependent vectors. I’m interested in load sharing and Miner’s rule.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Headshot of Michael PfeiferArticles by Michael Pfeifer, Ph.D., P.E.
in the Metals Engineering and Product Reliability article series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • test
  • test
  • test
  • Your Most Important Business Equation
  • Your Suppliers Can Be a Risk to Your Project

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy