Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Adam Bahret 1 Comment

Prognostics

Prognostics

Engineers have been applying Prognostics to mechanical components for many years.

For example:

  • Motors, increase in current or noise
  • Mechanical pumps, progressive increase in vibration
  • Thermal systems, time to achieve a set temperature
  • Fluid systems, change in pressure

However, most industries building systems with mechanical components choose not to use prognostics because of the cost of the instrumentation within the product. Products that have on board “smarts” can choose to include diagnostics with less effort or expense. With advances in technology, the cost of the instrumentation is dropping. This not only means that adding the hardware to support advanced metrology is more feasible but that many of these components/systems may have already been added for other functionality and controls improvements in the product. It doesn’t take much brainstorming to find creative ways to use these existing sensory systems.

I worked with a  team on a diagnostics program where we discovered we could use the microphone in the device to give an indication of the structural integrity of the plastic housing. Known sound levels would produce a different frequency (sound) profile dependant on how rigid the plastic housing components were fastened to each other.  A progression in sound profile would indicate that the fasteners or heat stakes were loosening, a common wear issue.  The product had a wifi connection, so a rigidity status/warning could be communicated to the manufacturer.  A “preventative maintenance or replace” email could then be sent to the customer far in advance of any performance issues.  It was a software update that added a prognostic function for an entire product line.

The biggest investment in creating a prognostic program is developing and implementing the “research” program that will profile these patterns of signals/indicators with system health.  This can be a heavily iterative process.

The questions to be answered are…

  • What failure modes are most common, we can’t monitor everything?
  • What do failure modes of these systems look like as they progress from healthy to complete failure?
  • What are the outputs we should monitor to identify the status of these performance factors?
  • What existing monitoring on the system can be utilized and what opportunities are there for adding metrology?

Let’s not overlook the gems just beneath our feet! With or without a formal “test and analyze” program to study the correlation of signals, outputs, and health, we can mine our historical data and look for relationships.  Some scrubbing of available data sets and a little statistical correlation analysis can yield some very interesting relationships between already measured signals and impending failure.

Only a few correlations need to be identified for further investigation to kick off a strong prognostics program, with justification for further funding.

-Adam

 

Filed Under: Apex Ridge, Articles, on Product Reliability

About Adam Bahret

I am a Reliability engineer with over 20 years of experience in mechanical and electrical systems in many industries. I founded Apex Ridge Reliability as a firm to assist technology companies with the critical reliability steps in their product development programs and organizational culture.

« High MTBF with Low Reliability
Hiring a Consultant? Choose Great Over Good! »

Comments

  1. Hilaire Perera says

    June 1, 2017 at 6:20 PM

    Adam has given a good introduction to Prognostics. Prognostic Health Management (PHM) is a methodology that permits the assessment of the reliability of a system under its actual application conditions, and exercises necessary management actions. To learn and apply PHM methodology, recommend joining the CALCE Prognostic and Health Management Group. http://www.prognostics.umd.edu/

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Article by Adam Bahret
in the Apex Ridge series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • test
  • test
  • test
  • Your Most Important Business Equation
  • Your Suppliers Can Be a Risk to Your Project

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy