Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Steven Wachs Leave a Comment

What is the Relationship between Process Stability and Process Capability?

What is the Relationship between Process Stability and Process Capability?

Process Stability and Process Capability are both extremely important aspects of any manufacturing process.  Often the concepts behind process stability and process capability and the relationship between them are misunderstood.  This article attempts to clarify both ideas and the relationship between them.  

Defining Process Stability and Process Capability

Process Stability refers to the consistency of the process with respect to important process characteristics such as the average value of a key dimension or the variation in that key dimension.  If the process behaves consistently over time, then we say that the process is stable or in control.  The graphic below illustrates a stable process.  The process distribution remains consistent over time.

The next graphic illustrates an unstable process.  The process distribution average is shifting over time.

Statistical Process Control Charts are utilized to determine if the process is stable or not.  Some charts are used to assess the stability of the process location (e.g. xbar charts which monitor the process average), other charts are used to assess the stability of the process variation (e.g. range or standard deviation charts).

Process Capability is a measure of the ability of the process to meet specifications.  It tells us how good the individual parts are.  Several methods exist to measure process capability including an estimation of the ppm (defective parts per million).  Capability indices such as Cp, Cpk, Pp, Ppk are very popular, however trying to summarize the capability via a single index is often misleading as key information about the process is lost.  The issues with capability indices will be discussed in a future article.

An Example:  Nonfat Cookies

To make sure we understand the difference between process stability and process capability, consider my wife’s attempts to bake nonfat cookies.  For years, she has been experimenting with different recipes with the objective of producing a great tasting non-fat cookie (that has reasonable texture as well!  Unfortunately, she has not yet succeeded.  While her results have not been capable (they are out of spec), she has been very consistent — consistently bad.  I do know what to expect from her nonfat cookies so I can say that she is at least stable (or in-control).

Process Stability vs. Process Capability

Process stability and process capability are different ideas and there is no inherent relationship between them.  That is, knowing that the process is capable (or not capable) tells us nothing about the process stability.  Furthermore, knowing if the process is stable (or not) tells us nothing about the process capability.  The following graphic illustrates all four possible scenarios.  The graphic shows the distribution of individual measurements over time (left to right) relative to the upper and lower specification limits.

  • In the upper left quadrant, the process is stable (in control) but is not capable of meeting specifications.  If we viewed this process with a control chart, it would illustrate a stable process and we would have no idea that it’s not capable.
  • In the lower left quadrant, the process is stable and capable.
  • In the lower right quadrant, the process is not stable, although we might say that it is capable of meeting specification (Note:  this is not really the correct interpretation as will be discussed shortly)
  • In the upper right quadrant, the process is neither stable, nor capable.

The One Link Between Stability and Capability

While there is no direct relationship between process stability and process capability, there is an important connection.  It is:  Process capability assessment should only be performed after first demonstrating process stability.

As discussed earlier, process capability is an assessment of the ability to meet specification.  However, if the process is unstable, we cannot make predictions as to its capability.  Any estimate of process capability we make depends entirely on where the process happens to be when we collect the data.  Suppose the process average is shifting about over time.  An estimate of the process capability is only reflective of where the process is at that point in time…not where it may go next.

Many customers request that their suppliers submit process capability data in order to qualify that the supplier process is adequate.  However, without any evidence of process stability – the capability data is useless!  It is not enough to know that a process is capable at some point in time.  The process must achieve this capability consistently….and that’s where process stability comes into play.

Filed Under: Articles, Integral Concepts, on Tools & Techniques

About Steven Wachs

Steven Wachs has 25 years of wide-ranging industry experience in both technical and management positions. Steve has worked as a statistician at Ford Motor Company where he has extensive experience in the development of statistical models, reliability analysis, designed experimentation, and statistical process control.

« Why FMEA Needs to be Team-Based
t-test Hypothesis Testing for Means with Unknown Variance »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Articles by Steven Wachs, Integral Concepts
in the Integral Concepts article series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • test
  • test
  • test
  • Your Most Important Business Equation
  • Your Suppliers Can Be a Risk to Your Project

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy