Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Christopher Jackson Leave a Comment

Reliability happens when you become impatient and selfish

Reliability happens when you become impatient and selfish

I often start teaching my reliability engineering courses … by focusing on other reliability engineering courses. Why? Because they exemplify what is wrong with how most ‘reliability experts’ go about convincing others to take reliability seriously.

A typical reliability engineering course will start with images of disaster. A Chernobyl here. A Fukushima there. A crashed airplane. The Tacoma Narrows Bridge. Lots of other atrocities that happen when we don’t do reliability engineering properly.

Reliability engineers might even talk about slightly more relatable things like company reputation. Quality. Customer expectation. Emerging technology. User demands.

The problem with all this imagery is that it is abstract. The disasters are rare enough for them to not be tangible outcomes of everyday design decisions. The catastrophes are the combination of tens or hundreds of bad decisions that make it difficult to understand how a single individual contributes to them. And things like brand reputation are great for the shareholders of your company … but what does that mean for my annual bonus when my boss looks at the hydraulic system I designed?

Reliability happens when you become impatient and selfish. And that means everyone in your organization realizes the tangible benefits of reliability that you start reaping from day one.

Reduced production costs … starting now

A common refrain is that …

… you can chose any two of ‘fast,’ ‘cheap’ or ‘reliable.’

This is rubbish.

There are a plethora of examples of companies that were able to do things like reduce recommended retail price (RRP) as the result of a reliability. Just to pick one – Hewlett Packard dropped RRP of its commercial oscilloscopes by 16 % by focusing on reliability. 

How?

High reliability means fewer failures. Including ‘production team failures.’

We usually associate ‘failure’ with our product, system or service breaking in the hands of our customer or user. But failures start a lot earlier than that. Production team failures are those annoying instances of our components not aligning, selecting the wrong material, software providing the wrong output and all those other things that ruin our day when we are trying to make something new and amazing. All those little (and not so little) production team failures mean we need to go and redo stuff we already thought (or hoped) we had done. And that costs money. 

Reliability engineering means we make our first design a reliable design. 

Meaning we don’t throw money away during production.

Speeding everything up … also starting now

Those Hewlett Packard oscilloscopes were produced 30 % faster after their reliability improvement initiative. This is where a lot of the savings that allowed them to reduce the RRP came from.

This is not an isolated exampled. Seasoned reliability engineers who have worked in truly successful organizations could amaze you with all manners of similar stories … if only the details of each amazing success story weren’t commercial-in-confidence!

Isn’t it amazing that companies who renowned for reliability (like Toyota and Apple) are also wildly successful (largest automobile manufacturer and most valuable company respectively)? 

Reducing stress. Starting yesterday.

This is not a conclusion everyone leaps to when we think about reliability engineering.

I’ll put it to you this way. Have you ever been in a project where you are involved in something significant, critical, or expensive? I’ll bet that at times throughout that project there are fits of organization-wide pandemonium when we need to check that everything is ‘OK’ or we are ‘on track.’ We might have project management meetings where we go through a 753-point check list of stuff. Or auditors that check everything including font size. Or really, really big PowerPoint presentations.

None of this is truly helpful.

Reliability engineering is all about understanding the vital few things of your product, system or service that will keep you up at night. And instead of having to check everything, we can actually focus on addressing the couple of things that matter the most.

This is a lot less stressful because it creates confidence. Confidence drives down stress. When you are all about compliance, you tend not to be confident because you are all about passing tests. When you focus on the vital few, you know why you are doing the things you do. Not running around like a headless chicken trying to make every person/boss/standard/consultant/auditor/shaman happy. 

Impatience and selfishness can be useful

There are plenty more benefits from reliability engineering that you will start to benefit from immediately. There is a catch – you have to take reliability engineering seriously. If you don’t, then you simply impose a bunch of half-hearted initiatives on your people that chew up their calendar and yield little in return.

What about you? Do you have any stories of how reliability engineering started benefitting you straight away? We would love to hear from you!

Filed Under: Articles, on Product Reliability, Reliability in Emerging Technology

About Christopher Jackson

Chris is a reliability engineering teacher ... which means that after working with many organizations to make lasting cultural changes, he is now focusing no developing online, avatar-based courses that will hopefully make the 'complex' art of reliability engineering into a simple, understandable activity that you feel confident of doing (and understanding what you are doing).

« Anatomy of a ‘Failure’
Factors of Safety and Load Factors »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Article by Chris Jackson
in the Reliability in Emerging Technology series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • test
  • test
  • test
  • Your Most Important Business Equation
  • Your Suppliers Can Be a Risk to Your Project

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy