Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

Reliability Maturity Matrix

Reliability Maturity Matrix

The concept of a maturity model is not new. It provides a means to identify the current state and illuminate the possible improvements to a reliability program. The matrix serves a guide to assist an organization in improving its program.

The matrix has five stages. In general, the higher stages are most cost effective and efficient at achieving higher rates of product reliability performance. These stages—uncertainty, awaking, enlightenment, wisdom, and certainty—are described in today’s post.

Stage 1: Uncertainty

“We don’t know why we have problems with reliability.”

 

Reliability is rarely discussed or considered during design and production. Product returns resulting from failure are considered a part of doing business. Field failures are rarely investigated, and often blame is assigned to customers. The few people who consider reliability improvements gain little support. Reliability testing is done in an ad hoc fashion and often just to meet customer requirements or basic industry standards.

Stage 2: Awakening

“Is it absolutely necessary to always have problems with reliability?”

 

Reliability is discussed by managers but not supported by funding or training. Some elements of a reliability program are implemented, yet generally not in a coordinated fashion. Some tools such as FMEA and accelerated and highly accelerated life testing are experimented with, but the most effort still focuses on standards-based testing and meeting customer requirements. Some analysis is done to estimate reliability or understand field failure rates, yet limited use is made of these data in making product decisions. There is, however, an increasing emphasis on understanding failures and resolving them. Failure analysis is typically accomplished by component vendors with little result.

Stage 3: Enlightenment

“Through commitment and reliability improvement we are identifying and resolving our problems.”

 

A robust reliability program exists and includes many tools and processes. Generally, significant effort is directed to resolving prototype and field reliability issues. Increasing reliance is placed on root-cause analysis to determine appropriate solutions. Some tools are not used to their full potential owing to lack of understanding of reliability and how the various tools apply. Some reliance is placed on establishing standard testing and procedures for all products. Only some use of these testing results is made for estimating product reliability to supplement predictions. Predictions are primarily made to address customer requests and not as feedback to design teams.

Stage 4: Wisdom

“Failure prevention is a routine part of our operation.”

 

Each product program or project has a tailored reliability program that can be adjusted as the understanding of product reliability risks changes. Reliability tools and tasks are selected and implemented because they will provide needed information for decisions. Testing focuses on either discovering failure mechanisms or characterizing failure mechanisms. Testing often proceeds to failure, if possible. Advanced data analysis tools are regularly employed and reports are distributed widely. There is increasing cooperation with key suppliers and vendors to incorporate the appropriate reliability tools upstream.

Stage 5: Certainty

“We know why we do not have problems with reliability.”

 

Product reliability is a strategic business activity across the organization. There is widespread understanding and acceptance of design for reliability and how it fits into the overall business. Product reliability is accurately predicted prior to product launch using a mix of appropriate techniques. New materials, processes, and vendors are carefully considered for their ability to meet internally established reliability requirements. The few failures that do occur are expected and analysis is done to identify early signs of material or process changes. Customers and suppliers are regularly consulted on ways to improve reliability.

The reliability maturity matrix is available to download for free for Accendo Reliability members. You can find the download at the Reliability Maturity page along with the ebook about the maturity matrix and how to apply it properly for your program.

Filed Under: Articles, Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics, on Product Reliability Tagged With: Maturity matrix, team

About Fred Schenkelberg

I am the reliability expert at FMS Reliability, a reliability engineering and management consulting firm I founded in 2004. I left Hewlett Packard (HP)’s Reliability Team, where I helped create a culture of reliability across the corporation, to assist other organizations.

« Someone had to do it
delusional thinking? »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Article by Fred Schenkelberg
in the Musings series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • test
  • test
  • test
  • Your Most Important Business Equation
  • Your Suppliers Can Be a Risk to Your Project

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy