Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

Reliability Questions and Decisions

Reliability Questions and Decisions

Very few reliability decisions are made by reliability engineers. Yet, reliability engineers are asked many questions concerning reliability. How reliable will this design be for customers? How will the system likely fail? How many failures should we expect next month?

How you answer these and the many other questions received does impact the reliability of your product or system. The information provided those that ask reliability related questions, with useful and practical information, can make better decisions which improves reliability performance.

Relationship Between Questions and Decisions

As I’ve said before, ‘Reliability occurs at the point of decision’. When an engineer selects one material type versus another, or one component versus another, or a vendor over another, those are decisions. These decision directly impact the product’s reliability performance.

Implied within each decision is a question. For example, when deciding on a vendor to provide power supplies, the underlying question is ‘which vendor should we select in this situation?’ We make decisions to resolve questions concerning optimizations, comparisons, objectives, measurements, preventions, priorities, and resources.

A team developing a new product may initially have an objective question, “how reliable should we make this product?’ Once an objectives is set, the team moves on to questions involving how to achieve that objective.

Some questions are to gather facts or information which inform decision makers when addressing other questions. For example, when considering which material to use for an enclosure, a supporting question may be what environmental conditions will the item experience? Having that information provides the necessary information to select the appropriate material.

Some questions are directly related to a decision that impacts reliability. Some questions are requests for information necessary to make a decision.

Help Others Ask Better Questions

Besides responding to reliability related questions, a key role for a reliability professional is to assist others in the organization to ask better questions. Consider the difference between a questions such as, “Is it reliable enough to ship?” compared to, “Given our current understanding, what needs improvement to meet our reliability goals?”

Better questions are more specific and clear. Better questions invoke implementation of a clear reliability vision, or seek specific and actionable information.

Many organizations use product life cycle guidelines to frame milestones over the course of developing a product. The reliability team may, in addition, provide design guidelines, lesson learned summaries, vendor assessment rubrics, and more.

Creating frameworks to assist clear thinking and decision making enables those in your organization to craft meaningful contracts, specifications, assessments, and test plans that all support achieving the organization’s reliability vision.

Do not create checklist. They help other avoid thinking, and that results in less understanding and less consideration of reliability impact on product performance. If the question posed is, “Did we do XYZ tasks?” may indicate a checklist mentality as opposed to the question, “What did we learn and implement from XYZ tasks?”

Set Expectations Around What Decisions To Make

One hurdle to overcome is that some folks in your organization do not know that the decisions they make impact the resulting reliability performance of the product. They may be focused on cost or time to market, which is common, yet that does not mean they should ignore reliability.

Besides guidelines and frameworks, you can also provide training, coaching, and always provide an example of how to consider reliability in balance with other priorities. Demonstrate how to frame better questions, to incorporate reliablity information into decision making, and expose the thought processes along the way.

Realizing there are thousands and thousands of decision made during a product’s lifecycle and many of them have the potential to improve or degrade the product’s reliability performance is a first step to extend your reliability program beyond just responding to questions you receive.

Enabling others to both ask better questions and to make better decision will have a net positive effect on achieving the desired reliability performance of your product.

Filed Under: Articles, Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics, on Product Reliability

About Fred Schenkelberg

I am the reliability expert at FMS Reliability, a reliability engineering and management consulting firm I founded in 2004. I left Hewlett Packard (HP)’s Reliability Team, where I helped create a culture of reliability across the corporation, to assist other organizations.

« Equipment Risk
Single Sample Z-test Hypothesis Testing for Mean with Known Variance »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Article by Fred Schenkelberg
in the Musings series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • test
  • test
  • test
  • Your Most Important Business Equation
  • Your Suppliers Can Be a Risk to Your Project

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy