Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

Reliability Specifications and Requirements

Reliability Specifications and Requirements

The communication between suppliers or vendors and their customers is often using a mix of specifications and requirements.

Customers set requirements and suppliers offer specifications. When they match, or when a supplier component specifications meet the customer’s requirements, we have the potential for a transaction.

Most products on the market include materials, components, or subassemblies, from other organizations.

The product development team conceives of a product concept then organizes the necessary elements to create a product.

Many of those elements are purchased.

Elements may be standard items, like bolts or capacitors, essentially bought off the shelf. Some elements are custom.

Custom elements may include drawings and extensively documented requirements.

Examples of custom elements of a product include the printed circuit boards and molded enclosure parts.

Reliability Requirements

The reliability requirements are the goal statement for the element.

If the cell phone has a system goal of 95% reliable over 5 years, then the main circuit board within the phone may have a reliability goal of 99% reliable over 5 years.

The development team may refine the environmental and use conditions specific for the element, in this case, a circuit board in order to fully describe the reliability requirements.

Just as when setting a reliability goal the apportioned goal for purchased elements require all four elements:

  • Function – often detailed in a requirements document
  • Environment – use conditions and profile details
  • Duration – length of time or number of cycles
  • Probability – likelihood of successfully functioning over the duration

Specific requirements for purchased elements of a product provide the supplier the necessary information to provide or craft an element of the product that enables the system to meet reliability goals.

If the supplier does not know the reliability requirements, they will attempt to provide a part that meets the stated requirements only.

The reliability performance will be uncertain.

Generally, suppliers desire to provide components that last longer than the products expected duration of use.

Suppliers do not want to field customer complaints that their element of a product is causing premature or early failures.

The more information the supplier has about the product and reliability goals, the more likely the supplier can provide a solution.

Reliability Specifications

Many components found in products have many applications.

Motors, power supplies, buttons, etc are examples of components found in cell phones, medical devices, industrial equipment, and vehicles. And in each application, the basic technology may be identical.

For example, a specific multilayer ceramic capacitor without modification may become part of your laptop computer or family vehicle.

The organization designing and producing the capacitors doesn’t know the final product application.

The supplier for non-custom parts crafts a data sheet which describes the functional, environmental, mechanical, electrical, and in many cases reliability elements of duration and probability.

The data sheet may provide a reliability statement under specific functional and environmental conditions.

The reliability statement may be as simple as a failure rate value, or a set of formulas describing the likely time to failure under specific stress.

This latter example is very rare, unfortunately.

Most reliability specifications are lacking one or more of the four elements of a fully stated reliability goal.

Ideally, the supplier can articulate the likely failure mechanism (how the component is most likely to fail) along with how the component responds to a range of stresses.

If a component would survive 20 years with a very small chance of failure if operated in a climate controlled environment maintaining a steady 30°C, or have a high chance of failure in 5 years if used in a 30°C swing in an hourly thermal cycling environment, that should be made clear.

Custom Parts

When a design calls for a custom part, the development team crafts the requirements and seeks one or more supplier to create an element that meets the requirements.

The supplier may add specifications, yet those are often just at or beyond the requirements.

The same is true for the reliability requirements discussion.

The supplier may attempt to exceed the requirements in order to have some margin over the requirements. Instead of creating a component that is exactly 99% reliable over 5 years, the supplied part may actually achieve 99.9% reliability over 5 years.

This is possible at times, and sometimes not so due to technology or economic constraints.

Ideally, the requirements include the necessary reliability elements that are consistent with the overall system requirements.

Plus, the supplier provides elements the meet or exceed the expected reliability performance.

This really only can occur if the two parties communication the expectations and capabilities clearly.

We already use requirements and specifications to start these conversations.

Now look closely at those documents and make sure they include the reliability elements that make the reliability performance clear for both parties.


Related:

Additional Reliability Specification for Your Supplier (article)

Establishing Part Specific Reliability Specifications (article)

What to Specify with Suppliers to Achieve Reliability Goals (article)

 

 

Filed Under: Articles, Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics, on Product Reliability

About Fred Schenkelberg

I am the reliability expert at FMS Reliability, a reliability engineering and management consulting firm I founded in 2004. I left Hewlett Packard (HP)’s Reliability Team, where I helped create a culture of reliability across the corporation, to assist other organizations.

« Plot the Data
Confidence Interval for Variance »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Article by Fred Schenkelberg
in the Musings series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • test
  • test
  • test
  • Your Most Important Business Equation
  • Your Suppliers Can Be a Risk to Your Project

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy