Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Fred Schenkelberg 1 Comment

Root Cause Knowledge and Models

Root Cause Knowledge and Models

Two short questions to evaluate your knowledge of failure mechanisms (root causes) and common reliability models. The answers will be posted in a comment, later.

Which of the following failure root causes is most likely NOT due to power line variation (electronic-based product)?

A. Circuit design margin exceeded
B. Power dissipation
C. In-rush current response
D. Mechanical fatigue

Which theory is customarily used to calculate the effects of temperature on the life of a part?

A. Arrhenius model
B. Duane model
C. Miner’s rule
D. Inverse power rule

And, of course, each question could be reworded in a myriad of ways to explore many failure mechanisms, root causes, and reliability models. Part of the role of a reliability engineer is to have a solid working knowledge of failure mechanisms and how they commonly appear and are caused. Plus, we need a broad working knowledge of the range of models and approaches to understanding the effect of various stresses on failure mechanisms and life estimates.


Related:

Sources of Reliability Data (article)

Common Cause Failures (article)

5 books for a professional reliability engineer (article)

 

Filed Under: Articles, CRE Preparation Notes, Reliability Testing Tagged With: failure mechanisms, reliability models, root cause

About Fred Schenkelberg

I am the reliability expert at FMS Reliability, a reliability engineering and management consulting firm I founded in 2004. I left Hewlett Packard (HP)’s Reliability Team, where I helped create a culture of reliability across the corporation, to assist other organizations.

« Two Pumps Problem
What is Reliability »

Comments

  1. Fred Schenkelberg says

    September 30, 2012 at 4:58 PM

    Answers and rationale:

    Which of the following failure root causes is most likely NOT due to power line variation (electronic based product)?

    A. Circuit design margin exceeded
    A traditional failure mechanism due to power line variation
    B. Power dissipation
    A traditional failure mechanism due to power line variation
    C. In-rush current response
    A traditional failure mechanism due to power line variation
    D. Mechanical fatigue
    Correct – while power line fluctuations may cause mechanical and thermal variation within a product leading to mechanical fatigue, it is more likely due to cycling loads or thermal cycling.

    Which theory is customarily used to calculate the effects of temperature on the life of a part?

    A. Arrhenius model
    Correct – especially for the change in chemical reaction rate due to temperature.
    B. Duane model
    Commonly used for modeling reliability growth rates
    C. Miner’s rule
    Commonly used to estimate the fatigue life of a part based upon applied stress cycles.
    D. Inverse power rule
    Commonly used for effects of voltage on dielectric breakdown (and other mechanisms, though not commonly used for thermal stresses.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CRE Preparation Notes

Article by Fred Schenkelberg

Join Accendo

Join our members-only community for full access to exclusive eBooks, webinars, training, and more.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Get Full Site Access

Not ready to join?
Stay current on new articles, podcasts, webinars, courses and more added to the Accendo Reliability website each week.
No membership required to subscribe.

[popup type="" link_text="Get Weekly Email Updates" link_class="button" ]

[/popup]

  • CRE Preparation Notes
  • CRE Prep
  • Reliability Management
  • Probability and Statistics for Reliability
  • Reliability in Design and Development
  • Reliability Modeling and Predictions
  • Reliability Testing
  • Maintainability and Availability
  • Data Collection and Use

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy