Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Fred Schenkelberg 12 Comments

Selecting Control Charts

Selecting Control Charts

Consider a handy flow chart and set of descriptions that will assist you in selecting the appropriate control chart, or at least understand the differences.

Control-Chart-Selection-Flowchart

 

What is a control chart?

Control charts are the central tool for statistical process control (SPC). Control charts permit us to graphically and in real-time understand the stability of the process. We make measurements and with simple plots can notice meaningful shifts in the process.

Changes in a process can be adverse (out of control) and indicated something in the process may need correction. A change may also be beneficial. In this latter case, we may want to investigate the cause of the change and improve the process.

Look at the data

Selecting the right plot is the second step in using control charts. The first step is to determine what to measure and the nature of the data. Once we know if the data is:

  1. variable or attributes data (continuous or count), and
  2. the size of the sample collected,

we can select the appropriate control chart using the flowchart.

At the moment the chart does not include all forms of control charts. There are specialty charts for use in unique situations, such as the X̄ – s chart for when we can calculate the sample standard deviation. Other types of charts include the EWMA chart, CUSUM chart, time series model and regression control charts.

The basic flowchart will get us started in the selection process. Understanding each type of chart and when and how to use it will refine the selection. With practice, you will be able to quickly determine the appropriate control chart and start making process improvements.

Types of Charts

This is a short description of the basic control charts. Including notes on when the particular chart is advantageous and a few assumptions to consider.

X̄ – r chart

Used to monitor variables data with regularly collected samples. The chart is useful when:

  1. The sample size is greater than 1 and less than 10.*
  2. The sample size is constant.
  3. A person manually does the calculations (range is easier to calculate than the standard deviation).

*With over ten samples for inspection use the X̄ – s chart as using standard deviation rather than range provides additional sensitivity to changes.

There are two parts to this chart. The first monitors the process mean and the other monitors the process variance using range as a surrogate for standard deviation.

Assumptions

The X̄ – r chart relies on the sample data being normally distributed. Using a sample mean has the advantage of the central limit theorem which allows sampling from a process that is not normally distributed, and the samples are ‘normal enough’ for the analysis to work.

The sample data is being drawn from a single distribution and it is stable. We are looking for changes of a stable process.

The mean and range of each sample does not depend on the values of any other sample. Each sample is independent.

X-MR chart

The X – MR, or X Moving Range chart is also known as the individuals and moving range or Shewhart individuals control chart. The chart permits monitoring variable data when it is impractical to use rational subgroups (sample size of 1). Plan on using this chart with variable data when:

  1. Automation permits inspection of each unit (100% inspection).
  2. Production is too slow to gather a meaningful group of samples.
  3. Measurement error dominates the differences between individual readings of a sample. This occurs when the process produces homogeneous batches (e.g. chemical production).
  4. The data does not have to be normally distributed.

Like the X̄ – r chart, the X – MR chart consists of two charts. One for the individual readings and the other for the moving range which is the difference between the last reading and the current reading.

Assumptions

The X – MR chart does not assume the data is normally distributed or is from any distribution. Thus, this approach is very robust and works with highly non-normal data.

c chart

Count or c chart works with attribute data when counting defects or nonconformities (aspects) per unit. For example, counting the number of paint blemishes, or the number of solder joints requiring repair per circuit board. There can be more faults than samples. The sample size is greater than one and constant.

Assumptions

The c chart relies on the Poisson distribution and can be appropriately used when:

  1. The potential for nonconformities is very large. For example, the paint on a car is a very large area and defects can be very small.
  2. The possibility of a single defect is small and constant.
  3. The sample inspection process is consistent from sample to sample.

u chart

The u chart monitors attribute count type data when the number or size of inspection units may vary. For example, this chart may be suitable when:

  1. Monitoring raw material received when the lot size varies.
  2. Monitoring the number of parking tickets issued per day.
  3. Monitoring production when product size varies.

Assumptions

The u chart relies on the Poisson distribution and can be appropriately used when:

  1. The potential for nonconformities is very large. For example, the paint on a car is a very large area and defects can be very small.
  2. The possibility of a single defect is small and constant.
  3. The sample inspection process is consistent from sample to sample.

p chart

The p chart monitors the proportion of nonconforming units in a sample. The individual unit inspections result in a pass/fail (attribute data). This approach does need more than one unit per sample and a method to determine if each unit meets requirements or not.

The sample size does not have to be constant yet is large enough to expect at least one failed unit in order to minimize false alarms. If possible to make measurements that are variables data use the (bar X) R or MR charts as they provide increased sensitivity to process changes.

Assumptions

The p chart relies on the binomial distribution and has the following assumptions:

  1. The chance of failure for each unit is the same, p.
  2. Each unit is independent of other units in the process.
  3. The sample inspection process is consistent from sample to sample.

np chart

The np chart is a modified p chart. By multiplying the proportion, p, by the number of samples, n, the chart plots the number of the nonconforming units instead of the proportion nonconforming. This may be easier to interpret.
The np chart does require a constant sample size, n.

Assumptions

The np chart relies on the binomial distribution and has the following assumptions:

  1. The chance of failure for each unit is the same, p.
  2. Each unit is independent of other units in the process.
  3. The sample inspection process is consistent from sample to sample.

Related:

Introduction to Control Charts (article)

Variables Control Chart Background (article)

8 Steps to creating an X-bar and s control chart (article)

Filed Under: Articles, CRE Preparation Notes, Probability and Statistics for Reliability Tagged With: Statistical Process control (SPC) and process capability

About Fred Schenkelberg

I am the reliability expert at FMS Reliability, a reliability engineering and management consulting firm I founded in 2004. I left Hewlett Packard (HP)’s Reliability Team, where I helped create a culture of reliability across the corporation, to assist other organizations.

« Previous Post
Voicing concern about MTBF »

Comments

  1. Deepika rawat says

    November 10, 2017 at 8:33 AM

    X BAR AND R VALUES FOR THE 10 SAMPLES OF TEA CONTAINING 30 PACKETS

    X Bar
    320

    310

    330

    360

    290

    280

    340

    320

    360

    300

    R
    12

    16

    14

    18

    22

    23

    10

    13

    27

    25

    Jhilimil Tea company has a packaging machine which pack tea in plastic packets, to ensure consistent quantity in each packet a sample of 30 packets were taken per hour in a day and its mean and range is recorded. Around 10 such sample were taken per day. from the following data answer the following questions.
    Answer Section
    Q.No 1: omment on the type of data being collected, which control chart is appropriate for the data and why.

    Enter …
    Choose file
    File Name :
    Save & continue
    Q.No 2: what are the values for Central Line, Upper control limit and lower control limit, also show the entire calculations for the response

    Enter …
    Choose file
    File Name :
    Save & continue
    Q.No 3: What are your interpretations for the above samples, can we accept that the system is in control, give justification for your answer.

    Reply
    • Fred Schenkelberg says

      November 10, 2017 at 4:32 PM

      This looks like a homework problem… which you should sort out given the resources available to you. None of these questions are particularly difficult for someone familiar with SPC control charting. Enjoy the adventure learning about SPC as it is a great tool to master. cheers, Fred

      Reply
      • Rajveer says

        November 13, 2017 at 7:54 AM

        Can i have the answer of these following question (jhilmil tea company)

        Reply
  2. Rajveer says

    November 13, 2017 at 9:34 AM

    Should i use xbar r chart or xbar s chart in this tea packet study caae?

    Reply
    • Fred Schenkelberg says

      November 13, 2017 at 10:03 AM

      Given the problem statement and provided data you have to use the R chart, as you are not given the information to calculate the standard deviations.

      In practice the S-chart is better as the range calculation is a crude estimate of standard deviation.

      Cheers,

      Fred

      Reply
      • Rajveer says

        November 13, 2017 at 5:18 PM

        So sir…should i use A2 value of 10 ? …as 30 is also given its confusing?…while calculating ucl…

        Reply
        • Rajveer says

          November 13, 2017 at 5:28 PM

          Like if i am calculating UCLr… then i should use D4 value of 10 in this question and 30 has nothing to do with this question ….correct??

          Reply
          • Fred Schenkelberg says

            November 13, 2017 at 5:39 PM

            I agree the question is confusing. 10 samples per day with each sample containing 30 items… at least that is how I read it.

            Check out https://lucas-accendo-site-speed.sprod01.rmkr.net/8-steps-to-creating-an-x-bar-and-r-control-chart/

            for the process to create these charts.

            Cheers,

            Fred

  3. Rajveer says

    November 13, 2017 at 6:29 PM

    Sir the only reason i keep on asking you is …you are so generous as you do reply ….sir just one question…should i use n as 10 or 30 in above scenario…..can i use D4 value of 10 for calculating ucl….or 30…and if yes what should be the d3,D4 value of 30….i m just learning…i am novice…plz advise me

    Reply
  4. Maher M. Al Mahdi says

    August 4, 2021 at 9:32 AM

    Hi! I work in healthcare facility and we count the number of patient visiting Emergency Department, which control chart would be applicable to use in this case and what is the classification of these data.
    Thx for your care

    Reply
    • Fred Schenkelberg says

      August 4, 2021 at 1:02 PM

      HI Maher,

      A count of arrivals per some duration would simply be count data – attribute and it would be possible to have more arrivals then one duration say an hour or day — so I would recommend the u-chart.

      cheers,

      Fred

      Reply
  5. Raghavendra. A says

    February 24, 2022 at 6:15 AM

    Nice

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CRE Preparation Notes

Article by Fred Schenkelberg

Join Accendo

Join our members-only community for full access to exclusive eBooks, webinars, training, and more.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Get Full Site Access

Not ready to join?
Stay current on new articles, podcasts, webinars, courses and more added to the Accendo Reliability website each week.
No membership required to subscribe.

[popup type="" link_text="Get Weekly Email Updates" link_class="button" ]

[/popup]

  • CRE Preparation Notes
  • CRE Prep
  • Reliability Management
  • Probability and Statistics for Reliability
  • Reliability in Design and Development
  • Reliability Modeling and Predictions
  • Reliability Testing
  • Maintainability and Availability
  • Data Collection and Use

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy