Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Ray Harkins Leave a Comment

Sharpening the Axe – Developing a Process Inspection Plan

Sharpening the Axe – Developing a Process Inspection Plan

Abraham Lincoln taught the value of adequate preparation when he said, “Give me six hours to chop down a tree and I will spend the first four sharpening the axe.” By training, quality professionals are often focused on verifying the correctness of a product. A traditional inspector at the Lincoln Timber Company might have dutifully marked in her audit log the date and time, the type and size of tree, followed by the comment, “Cut down.”

But Honest Abe would have advised her to take a closer look at the tools and process used to complete the job.

While modern manufacturing is straining between the increasing forces of narrower product tolerances and lower product cost, the bulk of quality professionals’ efforts are still focused solely on product compliance. By shifting effort “upstream” to the manufacturing process, inspectors and technicians can verify the process, which in turn will yield quality products.

According to quality management pioneer, Kaoru Ishakawa, every manufacturing defect can be traced back to one of four causes known as the “4 M’s”: Man (or “Operator”), Methods, Machine and Materials. This list was later expanded to include Measurement and Mother Nature (or the environment). By developing and implementing process inspection plans with key attributes from each of these six areas, a production team can verify that the “axe is sharp” before someone starts chopping.

Developing a Process Quality Plan

The foundation of an effective process inspection plan is a thorough investigation by the appropriate operators, engineers and inspectors. The right team can brainstorm a process, and then develop a comprehensive list of process attributes and variables. Using the 80-20 rule, this list can be narrowed to a handful of critical characteristics that “make or break” an acceptable process. Through some planning and experimentation, the team can transform the critical process characteristics into a working process inspection plan, complete with acceptable ranges, sampling frequency, and a reaction plan. 

By answering questions similar to those listed below for a particular manufacturing process, a development team can start assembling an effective process inspection plan.

Man – What are the specific training requirements for the process? Is additional supervision/inspection in place for the people who do not yet have that training?

Methods – What work instructions and documents are required for the process? To what revision are those documents? What are the targets and ranges for the key process parameters such as heat, time, pressure, vacuum, etc.?

Machine – What equipment is designated to run the job? Has that equipment received the appropriate preventive maintenance?

Materials – What are the correct raw materials? Did the material pass all receiving inspection criteria? What product packaging is required?

Measurement – Are the gages within their correct calibration period? Are all gages and instruments in good repair? Are visual product standards in place?

Mother Nature – Are the ambient conditions appropriate for processing this material?

By consistently verifying the correctness of a manufacturing process through the use of a well-designed process inspection plan, a manufacturing team has a far better chance of producing quality products at a competitive price. And making Mr. Lincoln proud.

Filed Under: Articles, on Tools & Techniques, The Manufacturing Academy

About Ray Harkins

Ray Harkins is a senior manufacturing professional with over 25 years of experience in manufacturing engineering, quality management, and business analysis.

During his career, he has toured hundreds of manufacturing facilities and worked with leading industry professionals throughout North America and Japan.

« Terrorism Risk: Years After 9/11 Is Your Organization More Or Less Vulnerable To Terror Threats?
Email @50 Years – Blessing or Risk »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Logo for The Manufacturing Acadamey headshot of RayArticle by Ray Harkins
in the The Manufacturing Academy article series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • test
  • test
  • test
  • Your Most Important Business Equation
  • Your Suppliers Can Be a Risk to Your Project

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy