Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

Show me the Data

Show me the Data

Early in my career, I worked for an unreasonable person.

He wanted us, his engineering staff, to show him the data. He wanted us to gather, monitor, analyze and display data regularly. Anytime we needed approval, funding, or resources he wanted to see the data.

Essentially this meant he wanted to understand the situation involved.

The variability of line yield or impact of the current tooling on product performance. If we wanted to start a project to make improvements, we had to show— with data— the current situation and why it needed improvement.

A table of summary statistics wasn’t good enough. He wanted the data, in detail. Plus, the summaries, plots, and comparisons. The reports had to include the data sources, measurement techniques, and analysis steps, along with the box plots.

He keyed in on assumptions, both engineering and statistical assumptions. When first working there I thought the only question he knew to ask was, “How do you know the data is normally distributed?”

An Experiment Every Day

Beyond having to show the data, we were also expected to conduct an experiment every day. Every day.

In college, we learned the scientific method through conducting a few experiments over a semester.

Sure, it could be a simple experiment: hypothesis, observation, analysis, and conclusion. Or rather complex such as a series of accelerated life test to determine the aging model for a new product. (Which only counted as one experiment.)

We did hypothesis tests and Taguchi L3  designs so often our statistics books wore out. Our engineering manager was happy to replace the references as needed.

We could spot an opportunity to conduct an experiment walking into the office or across the factory floor. From the material ordering process to final goods inspection, anything that could have variability, which is pretty much everything, was fair game for an experiment.

We answered questions involving could we measure a specific step in a process, could we monitor variability earlier in the process, could we determine which equipment setting contributed the most variability? We learned to ask questions, then go learn more about the subject.

We gathered data and ran experiments.

Looking Back

What a rich and supportive environment. The rule of the shop was to question everything.

Create informed decisions and share the data. We also learned the many statistical tools that allowed us to answer questions clearly.

We checked normality assumptions by gathering data and hand plotting on normal probability graph paper. We checked for measurement error by conducting gage repeatability and reproducibility studies anytime we wanted to use a gage to make a reading (this counted as an experiment).

We learned about data summary techniques, about data plotting, about companions, confidence intervals, Type I and II (and Type III) errors. We learned about control charts, process mapping, and design of experiments.

We learned how to ask questions we could answer, then ask questions that were difficult to answer. We learned a lot.

The plant ran better every day. Yield steadily improved, Throughput increased, Scrap declined. And, we as an organization learned from our data.

Are you learning from your data?

Do you have a full tool chest of statistical tools that allow you to understand, present, and convince others using data? Have you done an experiment today?


Related:

The Next Step in Your Data Analysis (article)

Confidence Interval Interpretations & Misunderstandings (article)

Field Data and Reliability (article)

 

Filed Under: Articles, Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics, on Product Reliability Tagged With: statistics

About Fred Schenkelberg

I am the reliability expert at FMS Reliability, a reliability engineering and management consulting firm I founded in 2004. I left Hewlett Packard (HP)’s Reliability Team, where I helped create a culture of reliability across the corporation, to assist other organizations.

« You May Often be Exceeding Operating Specifications!
Changing the Service Duty of a Pump »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Article by Fred Schenkelberg
in the Musings series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • test
  • test
  • test
  • Your Most Important Business Equation
  • Your Suppliers Can Be a Risk to Your Project

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy