Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Robert Allen 1 Comment

Simplified Project Management (Part 2)

Simplified Project Management (Part 2)

In Part 1 of this article series, we explored a simplified project management process using a phase/gate structure that enables a robust project planning and execution thought process.  Now let’s identify some deliverables within each of the phases.

These deliverables would be required and reviewed at each of the gates.  Below is a brief description of each:

Define

  • Project Charter – at Gate 0, the project charter provides enough information to approve the opportunity for further definition (ie enable initial filtering or down-selecting of projects or opportunities). The charter typically includes goals, objectives, business case, sponsors, team members, scope statement, constraints, assumptions.
  • Statement of Work (SOW) – tells a ‘story’ about what the team will do to achieve the desired result or future state. How will the team get there?
  • Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) – define and organize the project work according to a deliverable-oriented breakdown into smaller components (work packages or activities). The WBS can be an appendix of the SOW.

Plan

  • Project Plan Checklist – a customized checklist that asks key questions about how the project will be managed, executed, monitored and controlled.
  • Risk Assessment – an ongoing list of risks, scored by severity x likelihood.
  • Action Item List – an ongoing list of actions. Ideally the action item list would include the problem, issue or opportunity, in addition to the corresponding action.  Each action has a person responsible and an action sponsor.
  • Process Map – almost always necessary as a planning and analysis tool. It may be optional; however, the team should justify why it isn’t needed.
  • Project Schedule – schedule of activities and milestones, ideally in MS Project. Alternatively, a more informal schedule can be established within the action item list.
  • Work Breakdown Structure (update) – as a result of more comprehensive planning in this phase, an update of the WBS should be performed.

Implement

  • Project Status Document(s) – typically MS Powerpoint slides that provide project background information and status. Content can include: original problem statement, vision, business case or expected result/benefit, team members, project status (what’s been done thus far), and next steps.

Close

  • Lessons Learned – a project retrospective can be added to the MS Powerpoint project status documents.

Summarizing the deliverables (1) charter, (2) SOW/WBS (3) project plan & action items spreadsheet (4) project schedule if MS Project is used, (5) process map and (6) project status document.  From 3 to 6 collaborative project planning & execution deliverables, in addition to sponsorship (gate) reviews, can significantly improve a multi-project initiative.

Note the deliverables suggested herein enable the most basic project management for organizations that don’t have resources trained in the discipline of project management or certified project management professionals.  (Think “project management for non-project managers” or “project management for core team leaders”.)  Also note this approach is best suited for many low risk projects (as opposed to a single, high-risk project).

Also, if pursuing a process improvement initiative, the above framework can be either replaced or complemented by the DMAIC thought process.  Define, Measure and Plan, Analyze, Improve, Control and Close.   A lean sigma black belt with a background in project management could partner with core team leaders for a successful initiative.  Finally, all of the above is scalable and customizable to add structure and clarity to an organizations current-state project management process.

  Ask a question or send along a comment. Please login to view and use the contact form.

Filed Under: Articles, on Leadership & Career, Product Development and Process Improvement Tagged With: DMAIC, lean manufacturing, lean six sigma, portfolio management, product life cycle process, program management, project governance, Project Management, six sigma

About Robert Allen

Robert Allen has over 25 years of professional experience in the areas of product development, process improvement and project management. Rob was a key contributor to numerous deployments of lean sigma and project management organizations, most notably with Honeywell and TE Connectivity. Included in Rob’s experience are multiple certifications and over 25 years of practice in the development, teaching, execution, and leadership of product lifecycle, lean product development, DFSS, lean six sigma, project management, systems engineering and supply chain.

« Use Case 7 Frozen Lake Running
Critical Risks and Enterprise Risk Management »

Comments

  1. Vivian Park says

    September 4, 2020 at 11:37 AM

    Great ideas! I agree that an ongoing list of risks, scored by severity x likelihood.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Articles by Rob Allen
in the Product Development and Process Improvement series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Join PD&PI

Your email is safe and the opt-in here provides your permission to send messages concerning the PD&PI article list plus special announcements. Privacy Policy

Recent Posts

  • test
  • test
  • test
  • Your Most Important Business Equation
  • Your Suppliers Can Be a Risk to Your Project

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy