Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Mike Sondalini 1 Comment

Sizing Liquid Pipelines Easily

Sizing Liquid Pipelines Easily

Sizing liquid flow pipelines easily. Designing pipe work for liquid flow requires calculating the pressure losses along the pipe due to pipe friction. Once the losses are known the right pipe diameter can be selected. If full engineering calculations are not possible the conservative approach is to select pipe sizes that produce a velocity of less than 3 m/sec.

Keywords: pressure loss, viscosity, friction factor.

A ‘rule-of-thumb’ to use if you need to install liquid carrying pipelines without engineered drawings is to look for the largest supplying nozzle (usually a pump discharge or vessel outlet) and go up one standard pipe size for the main trunk line from the nozzle to the delivery point. For branches being supplied off the main trunk go up one pipe size if they are smaller than the main trunk line. Reduce down at nozzles and trunk line tees as necessary.

It is a handy rule-of-thumb but not the best way. The correct way to size liquid carrying pipelines is to calculate the pressure losses in the pipe from beginning to end.

NECESSARY REQUIREMENTS TO SIZE A PIPELINE

Pipe sizing depends on –

  • Liquid velocity – fast flows have more pressure loss.
  • Liquid viscosity (slipperiness) – the more viscous the liquid the more the friction. Temperature changes affect viscosity, usually decreasing with rising temperature.
  • Pipe length – longer pipes have more pressure loss.
  • Surface area – bigger diameters have lower velocities.
  • Pipe wall roughness (surface finish) – rough pipes have more friction until complete turbulence is reached.
  • Liquid vapour pressure – friction can cause such pressure loss the liquid boils and creates vapour bubbles.
  • Presence of bubbles – gas bubbles take up space.
  • Corrosive and erosive properties of the liquid – some liquids destroy piping at high velocities.

HOW TO CALCULATE PIPE SIZE

Engineers use the formula below (1) to calculate pressure loss in liquid carrying pipelines. Its use requires specialised knowledge. However an easier method is to assume a pipe velocity between 1m/s (3.25 ft/s) to a maximum of 4 m/s (13 ft/s) and use the much simpler second formula (2).

$$ \large\displaystyle\tag*{(1)}  {{H}_{1}}=\frac{fl{{V}^{2}}}{d2g}  $$

Where H1 is the head loss (m or ft)
f is the pipe wall friction factor depending on the liquid’s viscosity (dimensionless)
l is the equivalent pipe length (m or ft)
V is the liquid velocity (m/s or ft/s)
d is the pipe diameter (m or ft)
g is the gravitational constant (9.8 m/s2 or 32 ft/s2)

$$ \large\displaystyle\tag*{(1)} Q=VA $$

Where Q is the volume flow rate (m3/s or ft3/s)
V is the velocity (m/s or ft/s)
A is the area of the pipe bore (m2 or ft2)

Once the flow rate is decided or known, the pipe diameter can be calculated from the area. Minimise the cost of discharge pipelines by using smaller bore pipe with velocities at the high end of the recommended range. But to keep pressure loss low on suction piping use velocities from the lower end of the range.

WHERE PRESSURE LOSSES COME FROM IN PIPES

Liquid moving in a pipe has to push its way along pipe walls, around bends, through valves, past projections and enclosed items. Throughout its progress friction robs energy. Three factors that affect pressure loss in pipes.

Surface Friction – Along walls the liquid has to overcome friction. Wall friction depends on surface roughness. The higher the projections into the liquid the more the friction. At low velocities a laminar sub layer of slow flowing liquid covers the roughness. But at high velocities the sub layer thins as the eddies in the turbulent center flow extends to the projections. Figure 1 shows the flow at the pipe wall.

Figure 1 Effects of Surface Roughness on Liquid Flow.
Figure 1 Effects of Surface Roughness on Liquid Flow.

Direction Changes – Liquid that is forced to change direction loses energy. When a liquid goes around a 90o bend its momentum has to be redirected. From going at velocity in one direction it now has to go at the same velocity in a completely different direction. To do this it converts pressure into the energy it needs to change direction. A pressure loss results. The more sudden the change in direction the greater the energy it needs and the higher the corresponding pressure losses.

Liquid viscosity – A liquid that easily slides requires less energy to move than one that does not want to flow. Honey is thousands of times more viscous than water. Pushing honey through pipes, around corners and past valves requires far more energy than for water. If the honey was warmed it would then flow easier and the pressure loss would be less.

MINIMISE FRICTION IN PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION

During design, procurement and installation of a pipeline follow the recommendations in Table 1.

Table 1 Practices that minimize pressure loss in pipes.
Design
Select smooth bore pipes. 100 meters of 100mm (4”) plastic pipe containing water moving at 1 m/s (3.25 ft/s) will lose 900mm (35”) of pressure. The same flow in a 100mm steel seamless pipe will lose 1000mm (39”) pressure.
Minimise flow disruptions. Use long radius elbows; use pipe reducers; minimise the number of flanges; use full bore straight through valves; use pipe size branch tees and reduce down on the branch (a must on suction lines); use instrumentation which does not project into the flow.
Keep flow velocities low. Select pipe sizes that are practicable while keeping flow velocities reasonable.
Construction
Cut gasket holes to the bore diameter. Make the gasket bore hole to the pipe bore diameter. Do not let the gasket project into the liquid flow path as it will cause unnecessary friction and turbulence.
Clean off weld splatter. Weld splatter sits on the pipe surface and disrupts the liquid flow pattern. The splatter can come lose and damage down stream instruments and equipment.
Keep butt weld peaks low. Like gaskets cut with the diameter less than the pipe bore, welds with high peaks project into the liquid flow. Try keep welds below the height of the sub- layer thickness.
Make multiple segment mitered bends. ‘Lobster back’ 90° bends are used when large diameter long radius bends are not available. Make them out of equal sized 15° segments instead of the usual 22.5° segments

Mike Sondalini – Maintenance Engineer


We (Accendo Reliability) published this article with the kind permission of Feed Forward Publishing, a subsidiary of BIN95.com

Web: trade-school.education
E-mail: info@trade-school.education

Filed Under: Articles, on Maintenance Reliability, Plant Maintenance Tagged With: pipelines

About Mike Sondalini

In engineering and maintenance since 1974, Mike’s career extends across original equipment manufacturing, beverage processing and packaging, steel fabrication, chemical processing and manufacturing, quality management, project management, enterprise asset management, plant and equipment maintenance, and maintenance training. His specialty is helping companies build highly effective operational risk management processes, develop enterprise asset management systems for ultra-high reliable assets, and instil the precision maintenance skills needed for world class equipment reliability.

« The Specialist
UAV’s Coming to Your Neighborhood »

Comments

  1. Kairi Gainsborough says

    June 1, 2017 at 3:30 PM

    It’s really interesting that splatter from the welded seams inside a pipe can actually disrupt the flow of the liquid. I can imagine that this issue compounds when you consider how long a pipeline can be and how many seams there must be. Keeping those welds clean could go a long way in maintaining pressure.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Article by
Mike Sondalini
in the
Plant Maintenance series articles provided courtesy of Feed Forward Publications and Lifetime Reliability Solutions.

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • test
  • test
  • test
  • Your Most Important Business Equation
  • Your Suppliers Can Be a Risk to Your Project

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy