Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Fred Schenkelberg 1 Comment

Standby Redundancy, Equal Failure Rates, Imperfect Switching

Standby Redundancy, Equal Failure Rates, Imperfect Switching

First off, switches are not perfect, so this situation includes the reliability of the switch. Switch reliability may be a factor of storage time, probability of actually working when called on to work, or number of switching cycles. Each switch technology may be slightly different. For this equation, you need the reliability or probability of success given the primary unit has failed. Although we are assume the switch reliability is independent of the primary unit reliability and subsequent failure.

Second, in practice we use different equipment or components for the standby redundancy. For example we may use a diesel generator as a back up for grid power. Or use a refurbished pump to back up the main pump. Consider this situation for standby redundancy with equal failure rates (same type and age equipment) and an imperfect ability to detect and turn on the back up unit.

Let’s explore the math to estimate the system reliability given standby redundancy with an example.

Two Power Supply System with One Suppy in Standby

The two supplies have the same expected failure rate, 0.0005 failures per hour, over the duration we expect the system to operate, 730 hours. Only one operates at a time. And, we’re going to include how the second supply is turned on when the first one fails. We’re using an imperfect switch.

Here’s a simple diagram of the situation.

Standby Redundancy 2 elements

Where R1 is the reliability function of the power supplies. So, what is the reliability expectation of this standby redundancy configuration?

The formula for we can use in this situation is

$$ \large\displaystyle R\left( t \right)={{e}^{-\lambda t}}\left( 1+{{R}_{sw}}\left( t \right)\lambda t \right)$$

This is slightly different then the k-out-of-n formula with a 1-out-of-2 situation as the first unit operates alone while the standby unit is dormant and assumed to have not dormant failure period failures.

Let’s say the switch reliability, $- {{R}_{sw}}\left( t \right) -$, is 95% at 730 hours of system use, in this example.

Adding the values for $- {{R}_{sw}}\left( t \right) -$, t and $- \lambda -$ we find

$$ \large\displaystyle \begin{array}{*{35}{l}}
R\left( 730 \right)={{e}^{-\left( 0.0005 \right)730}}\left( 1+\left( 0.95 \right)\left( 0.0005 \right)730 \right) \\
R\left( 730 \right)={{e}^{-0.365}}\left( 1.347 \right) \\
R\left( 730 \right)=0.935 \\
\end{array}$$


Related:

Standby Redundancy with Equal Failure Rates and Perfect Switching (article)

Parallel Systems (article)

k out of n (article)

 

Filed Under: Articles, CRE Preparation Notes, Reliability Modeling and Predictions Tagged With: Reliability block diagrams and models

About Fred Schenkelberg

I am the reliability expert at FMS Reliability, a reliability engineering and management consulting firm I founded in 2004. I left Hewlett Packard (HP)’s Reliability Team, where I helped create a culture of reliability across the corporation, to assist other organizations.

« The Constant Failure Rate Myth
Just Because the Customer Requests MTBF »

Comments

  1. William Thorlay says

    April 5, 2020 at 5:36 AM

    I think you should emphasize that this formula is derivated from a binomial distribution and all of the components have constant failure rates.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CRE Preparation Notes

Article by Fred Schenkelberg

Join Accendo

Join our members-only community for full access to exclusive eBooks, webinars, training, and more.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Get Full Site Access

Not ready to join?
Stay current on new articles, podcasts, webinars, courses and more added to the Accendo Reliability website each week.
No membership required to subscribe.

[popup type="" link_text="Get Weekly Email Updates" link_class="button" ]

[/popup]

  • CRE Preparation Notes
  • CRE Prep
  • Reliability Management
  • Probability and Statistics for Reliability
  • Reliability in Design and Development
  • Reliability Modeling and Predictions
  • Reliability Testing
  • Maintainability and Availability
  • Data Collection and Use

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy