Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Fred Schenkelberg 4 Comments

The System Effectiveness Concept

The System Effectiveness Concept

Reliability is not the only concern when building a system.

Let’s consider a passenger car. Reliability refers to how often the car in the shop. How often we need to perform preventative or corrective maintenance. How often it fails.

Reliability does not include how long it will be unavailable for use. How long it is in the shop waiting for parts, for example. We want high availability, short repair times, too.

Plus, we also want the vehicle to be capable of doing the wide range of things we may want to do with it. Like, carry us safely to the grocery store and back. And, have the capacity to carry the groceries purchases without leaving behind a passenger or two.

There are other considerations, like cost, color, and style. These other factors may play a role in the capability of the system, or not, that would be locally defined for your project to develop the system.

The elements of reliability, availability, and capability capture the essential concepts that we need to create an effective system, like a passenger car.

Early System Effectiveness Discussions

Much of the early development of reliability engineering tools and techniques was for large military systems. In the 1950’s and ’60’s, various departments and organizations published standards, reports, handbooks, etc.

Many of the tools we use today, parts count predictions and physics of failure modeling became widely published.

Handbook Reliability Engineering, 1964

The US Naval first defined system effectiveness, as far as I know, in the Handbook Reliability Engineering, published by the direction of the Chief of the Bureau of Naval Weapons on 1 June 1964 (NAVWEPS 00-65-502). In the document system effectiveness is defined in section 1-3-1. System “Operational” Effectiveness of the document, excerpted here in its entirety.

The “worth” of a particular system or piece of equipment is determined primarily by the effectiveness with within it does its job — its “operational” effectiveness. An acceptable level of effectiveness is required of every system destined for tactical use.

Emphasis on reliability alone does not necessarily produce the required level of effectiveness. Other factors must be considered simultaneously. They are shown in Figure 1-5.

system effective breakdown

Each of these characteristics can be expressed as a “probability” of successful fulfillment of requirements, defined as follows:

Performance capability is the probability that the system1 will satisfy mission performance requirements when operating within specified design limits — a measure of “how well” it does its job when working properly.

Operational reliability is the probability that the system will maintain a specified level of performance throughout a given mission — a measure of “how long” it is capable of working without failure.

Tactical availability, or operational readiness, is the probability that at any point in the time the system will be ready to operate at a specified level of performance, on demand — a measure of “how often” the system is ready when needed.

Operational effectiveness is the product of these three characteristics, i.e.:

Effectiveness = Performance × Reliability × Availability

Operation effectiveness of an equipment or system is then the probability that it can successfully meet an operational requirement, for the duration of the need, when the need arises.

1. The words “equipment” and “system can be used interchangeably.

— End except

The entire document focuses on system effectiveness and expands on each of the three characteristics.

Weapon System Effectiveness Industry Advisory Committee (WSEIAC) 1965

In the committee’s final report (AFSC-TR-65-6) dated January 1965 the authors again stressed system effectiveness as being essential and being more than just reliability. Here is an excerpt from pages 8 and 9.

A. Principal Factors of Effectiveness

The WSEIAC has taken the position that system effectiveness is a quantitative measure of the extent to which a system may be expected to achieve a set of specific mission requirements. It is expressed as a function of three major system attributes:

  • Availability (A)
  • Dependability (D)
  • Capability (C)

 

Availability (A) is a measure of the condition of the system at the start of a mission when the mission is called for at an unknown (random) point in time.

Dependability (D) is a measure of the system condition during the performance of the mission: given its condition (availability) at the start of the mission.

Capability (C) is a measure of the results of the mission; given the condition of the system during the mission (dependability).

— End of excerpt

These concepts are not new and maybe have been forgotten. Take a look at your reliability program and how well do you support system effectiveness?

Filed Under: Articles, Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics, on Product Reliability Tagged With: system

About Fred Schenkelberg

I am the reliability expert at FMS Reliability, a reliability engineering and management consulting firm I founded in 2004. I left Hewlett Packard (HP)’s Reliability Team, where I helped create a culture of reliability across the corporation, to assist other organizations.

« Required Case History for Reliability Engineers
Understanding the Design Process »

Comments

  1. Anna says

    February 17, 2021 at 7:12 AM

    Dear Fred,

    I really enjoyed to read your article. Your work completely remove my doubts about the definition and components of the system effectiveness. Thank you very much!

    Best wishes,
    Ass. Prof. of V. Dahl EUNU
    Anna Khoroshun

    Reply
  2. John Green says

    May 7, 2021 at 1:27 AM

    Regretfully, system effectiveness is a dead concept according to DoD.

    Reply
    • Fred Schenkelberg says

      May 7, 2021 at 7:28 AM

      Hi John,

      is there a referece from the DOD on this? just curious.

      The concept overall is good, and worth understanding, I think.

      cheers,

      Fred

      Reply
  3. John Green says

    June 8, 2021 at 12:39 AM

    There are several. First, MIL-STD 721B was replaced by 721C. 721C contains no references to system effectiveness. Second, Coppola mentions that system effectiveness was dropped in favor of LCC (1984) “however, under the changing political climate in the 1970s, system effectiveness gradually gave way to life cycle costs as the military emphasis.” Third, Arnold of DAU discusses the need for the change (demise) in Designing Defense Systems.

    I’m with you and have been working on a dissertation under Jerrell Stracener that examines this.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Article by Fred Schenkelberg
in the Musings series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • test
  • test
  • test
  • Your Most Important Business Equation
  • Your Suppliers Can Be a Risk to Your Project

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy