Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Sanjeev Saraf Leave a Comment

Systematic Evaluation Of Reactive Chemical Hazards

Systematic Evaluation Of Reactive Chemical Hazards

Evaluation of reactive chemical hazards can range from simple paper-based calculations to highly complex testing and modeling. This post is aimed at helping you formulate a systematic strategy for evaluating reactive chemical hazards in your facility.  I will divide the various approaches in three tiers – simple to complex.

Tier I . Theoretical Screening

At the onset of the evaluation of reactive chemical hazards, you should try to answer the question – Is there potential reactive chemistry?

To answer this question you can make use of variety of tools:

  • functional groups indicative of reactivity hazards
  • using group contribution method to estimate energy of reaction
  • develop incompatibility matrix
  • reactivity data avaiable through MSDS or Bretherick’s Handbook

Tier II. Experimental Screening

Experimental screening involves the conduct of experimental tests to gauge the thermal hazard of materials and processes. The goal of these tests is to verify theoretical values identified previously as well as provide additional information by which the materials and processes may be characterized.

Experimental screening can be divided into three different areas of concern,

  • Reactivity: DSC, DTA, TGA
  • Mechanical sensitivity: Drop weight test, blasting cap test
  • Thermal sensitivity: DSC, DTA, TGA, Konen test

Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) is the work-horse of the industry in determing thermal sensitivity and reactivity.

Tier III. Detailed Testing and Modeling for Evaluating Chemical Hazards 

Experimental analysis involves conducting thermal hazard analysis tests to verify previous results as well as identify reaction rates and kinetics. The goal for this level of testing verifies calculated and experimental results and provides additional information by to characterize the materials and processes.

Conduct detailed testing usually use advanced calorimeters such as

  • Advanced Reaction Calorimeter (ARC) from TIAX (now part of Netzsch)
  • Automated Pressure Tracking Adiabatic Calorimeter (APTAC) from TIAX
  • Vent Size Package (VSP) from Fauske and Associates

These tests generate data for input into the development of a kinetic model.

By combining experimental data and kinetic model, one can now predict behavior of the reactive system with confidence.

These three approaches provide input for your strategy for evaluating reactive chemical hazards.

Filed Under: Articles, on Risk & Safety, Operational Risk Process Safety

About Sanjeev Saraf

Reduce risks, Increase Uptime, Reduce costs

I did my first litigation support work in 2000.

Since then I have been obsessed with preventing future failures. Some of these failures can have catastrophic consequences.

Having tried various techniques, learning / unlearning “latest” paradigms, it is clear we have a long way to go!

But instead of thoughtful work, what I mostly see are platitudes and oversimplifications. No keen practical insights!

I want to change that.

« Earned Value Management Reduces Project Risk
The Future of Reliability Engineering »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Photo of Sanjeev SarafArticles by Sanjeev Saraf
in the Operational Risk, Process Safety article series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • test
  • test
  • test
  • Your Most Important Business Equation
  • Your Suppliers Can Be a Risk to Your Project

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy