Is it possible for an individual to ‘do’ DFR? Is design for reliability something, like a specific technique, that is DFR?

What is DFR and how would you recognize it if it was occurring? Like meditation, nearly anyone can strike a pose that appears similar to someone in deep meditation, yet can you tell by observation if they really are mediating? Probably not. The same is true for an organization or person that declares they are doing DFR. Maybe they are or maybe not.

[Read more…]

There are two basic philosophies when creating a reliability plan for a new product or system.

One is to experiment with prototypes as quickly and often as possible, the build, test, fix, approach. Or, you can research and model detailed aspects of the materials and structures to characterize the strength of a product or system, the analytical approach.

Both methods have obvious applications and not so obvious limitations. [Read more…]

The better reliability performing systems start the design process with controlling variability.

Variability of materials and processes involved thought the product lifecycle. Reliability performance occurs as a result of the decisions made throughout the design process.

When focused on understanding and minimizing variability, the design becomes robust and reliable.

[Read more…]

An essential element of a successful reliability program is the notion that all reliability activity relates to decisions. If you are performing a HALT because it is listed in the product development guidelines, or because it was carried over from the last program’s plan, and the HALT results are not part of the design improvement decision-making process, then you probably should not be doing so. If the HALT results yield little or no information (e.g., it is just being checked off the list as accomplished) then the HALT itself provides little or no value. [Read more…]

Years ago I had the opportunity to assess the reliability programs of two organizations. They made similar products for different segments of the market, and they both had about the same size an organization. Two years previously, both organizations lost the reliability professional from their staffs. Furthermore, both teams were located in one building, one upstairs and the other downstairs, which made scheduling the assessment interviews convenient.

[Read more…]