Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Doug Lehr Leave a Comment

Temperature Deration

Temperature Deration

High temperature stress analysis of metallic components must account for an inevitable decrease in room temperature minimum yield strength (Sy). Linear-elastic stress analysis is the norm for nearly all downhole metallic components and accurate results depend upon the use of reliable temperature deration factors.

Below 300 ºF, there is a large database of temperature deration (TD) information available in the public domain for common structural metals. Guidance can also be found in the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (ASME BPVC) for steels commonly used in fabrication. However, at higher temperatures, the amount of TD information in the public domain is limited. This is problematic for the steels commonly used in downhole completion equipment.

This data gap complicates the design of completion equipment for high-pressure high-temperature service (HPHT). It contributes to the design risk associated with this type of equipment, which is typically used in offshore applications. Adequate mitigations must therefore be used to manage this risk.

  • To fill the data gap, OEMs and operators typically invest in extensive laboratory testing programs to establish proprietary databases of temperature deration factors for Sy.
  • Figure 1 Stress-strain curves change as temperature increases. (not too scale)

    High temperature stress analysis of metallic components must account for an inevitable decrease in room temperature minimum yield strength (Sy).Other mechanical properties decrease at high temperatures and must be considered in some types of analysis.

    • A decrease in ultimate strength (Su) will be consequential in an ASME Load and Resistance Factor analysis.
    • A decrease in Young’s modulus (E) will be consequential for the behavior of components that must possess high rigidity.
  • Conflicting data on deration factors may exist, so materials SMEs must decide which data is the most credible.

Finally, high-temperature equipment must always be de-risked using a laboratory test program designed to assess not only for performance BUT ALSO FOR for the expected high-temperature behavior of critical components.

TRUTH: The use of reliable temperature deration factors minimizes design risk.

This is the 4th in a series of 10 articles on critical equipment design for offshore completions.

  1. Critical Equipment Fundamentals
  2. Technology Readiness Level (TRL)
  3. Materials and Design Risk
  4. Temperature Deration
  5. Design for Reliability (DfR)
  6. Factors of Safety and Load Factors
  7. Using Industry Standards in Design
  8. Modelling and Simulation
  9. FMEA Improves the Bottom Line
  10. Lab Testing Programs

Filed Under: Articles, Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications, on Risk & Safety

About Doug Lehr

Doug Lehr is the Founder and Principal of Integris Technology Services LLC. He has over 40 years of experience in the development of downhole tools for oil and gas wells and has built a track record of success in technical management, innovation, and industry leadership.

« Outsourcing or ‘Out of sight, out of mind?’
Planning for a DOE »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Articles by Doug Lehr, P.E., Founder and Principal, Integris Technology
in the Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • test
  • test
  • test
  • Your Most Important Business Equation
  • Your Suppliers Can Be a Risk to Your Project

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy