Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Fred Schenkelberg 3 Comments

The Exponential Distribution

The Exponential Distribution

The exponential distribution is a model for items with a constant failure rate (which very rarely occurs).

If the chance of failure is the same each hour (or cycle, etc.), including the first hour, 100th hour, and 1 millionth hour or use, then the exponential distribution is suitable.

Many practitioners assume the failure rate either is constant or changes so little as to be essential constant in order to make reliability calculations simpler. The assumption is so common, and often inaccurate, that you should be aware of the exponential distribution. Furthermore, many questions in the CRE exam use the exponential distribution.

The exponential distribution is related to the Poisson distribution. For example, if a random variable, x, is exponentially distributed then the reciprocal follows a Poisson distribution. If x = 1 / y then y is a Poisson distribution.

The exponential distribution is a reasonable model for the mean time between failures, such as failure arrivals, whereas the Poisson distribution is used to model the number of occurrences in an interval.

Probability Density Function (PDF)

The exponential distribution PDF is similar to a histogram view of the data and expressed as

$$ \large\displaystyle f\left( x \right)=\frac{1}{\theta }{{e}^{-{}^{x}\!\!\diagup\!\!{}_{\theta }\;}}=\lambda {{e}^{\lambda x}}$$

Where, $- \lambda -$ is the failure rate and $- \theta -$ is the mean

Keep in mind that

$$ \large\displaystyle \lambda =\frac{1}{\theta }$$

Cumulative Density Function (CDF)

The CDF is the integral of the PDF and expressed as

$$ \large\displaystyle F\left( x \right)=1-{{e}^{-\lambda x}}=1-{{e}^{-{}^{x}\!\!\diagup\!\!{}_{\theta }\;}}$$

And represents the probability of failure over x which is commonly a duration. Of course, x ≥ 0.

Reliability Function

The reliability or probably of success over a duration, x, is

$$ \large\displaystyle R\left( x \right)={{e}^{-\lambda x}}={{e}^{-{}^{x}\!\!\diagup\!\!{}_{\theta }\;}}$$

And x ≥ 0 applies here as well.

Hazard Function

The exponential hazard function is determined via the ration of the PDF and Reliability functions

$$ \large\displaystyle h\left( x \right)=\frac{f\left( x \right)}{R\left( x \right)}=\frac{\lambda {{e}^{-\lambda x}}}{{{e}^{-\lambda x}}}=\lambda $$

Which is a constant.

Interesting Properties

The exponential distribution has a few interesting properties, primarily that it is memoryless. In other words, the probability of failure in the next instant or hour does not depend on how old the item is nor how long it has been in service.
Another aspect to consider is it is possible to add failure rates. This makes parts count predictions possible using limited tools for calculations. It used to be very easy to add and much more difficult to multiply or apply exponents, thus the desire to assume a constant failure rate.


Related:

Weibull Distribution (article)

Common formulas (article)

The Poisson Distribution (article)

 

Filed Under: Articles, CRE Preparation Notes, Probability and Statistics for Reliability Tagged With: Discrete and continuous probability distributions

About Fred Schenkelberg

I am the reliability expert at FMS Reliability, a reliability engineering and management consulting firm I founded in 2004. I left Hewlett Packard (HP)’s Reliability Team, where I helped create a culture of reliability across the corporation, to assist other organizations.

« Reliability Questions for the Drone Industry
Determine MTBF Given a Weibull Distribution »

Comments

  1. Dan Yarsley says

    September 15, 2020 at 6:17 AM

    Hello Sir,

    I remember reading an article, which I think you wrote, where it gave a background into how the E term was derived.

    Can you please provide me with the link to the article/page please? I cant seem to find it.

    Kind fraternal regards.

    Reply
    • Fred Schenkelberg says

      September 15, 2020 at 7:32 AM

      Hi Dan,

      I do not think I’ve written about the derivation of e – e, or Euler’s number, is a mathematical constant, similar to pi. It appears in a range of different applications. For me, e is central to the exponential family of distributions, including the exponential and Weibull distributions.

      The exponential decay as seen in a PDF of the exponential distribution arises due to the constant hazard rate. If we start with 100 items and all have the exact same chance of failure per hour, by the time we get to having only 50 items left running, it will take twice as long for the next item to fail (on average) as it took for the first of the 100 to fail. This is because in the first hour we have 100 chances to fail, while in the hour after we have only 50 items left, we only have half as many chances to fail.

      hope that helps

      cheers,

      Fred

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CRE Preparation Notes

Article by Fred Schenkelberg

Join Accendo

Join our members-only community for full access to exclusive eBooks, webinars, training, and more.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Get Full Site Access

Not ready to join?
Stay current on new articles, podcasts, webinars, courses and more added to the Accendo Reliability website each week.
No membership required to subscribe.

[popup type="" link_text="Get Weekly Email Updates" link_class="button" ]

[/popup]

  • CRE Preparation Notes
  • CRE Prep
  • Reliability Management
  • Probability and Statistics for Reliability
  • Reliability in Design and Development
  • Reliability Modeling and Predictions
  • Reliability Testing
  • Maintainability and Availability
  • Data Collection and Use

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy