Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Fred Schenkelberg Leave a Comment

Three Elements of Sample Size Concerning Decision Making

Three Elements of Sample Size Concerning Decision Making

The trite answer is just as many samples as you need and not one more.

A better answer is enough samples to make the right decision. The realistic answer is you will not enough samples.

“How many samples?” is an oft-asked question when planning for quality or reliability testing.

In some cases, a sample may take months to create and are expensive.

In other cases, you will have to deal with mock up or partially function samples.

In all cases, the samples you need for reliability testing will have to provide value.

The investment in samples expects the return of knowledge.

You need to convert those sparse group of units into valuable information revealing what will fail or when failures will occur.

So, how do you estimate how many samples you need for a specific experiment?

To determine the necessary sample size you need three pieces of information.

The risk, the variance, and the precision. Let’s discuss each of these in a little more detail.

The risk

There are two kinds of risk here: the risk of the unknown and the statistical risk.

 

Risk of the unknown

The first type concerns not doing the experiment. Making a decision without the data.

The chance the experiment will reveal vital information or confirm a hypothesis.

This risk of the unknown also includes unknown errors in the samples or test process.

The testing itself may produce faulty (often hidden) results.

If you do not carefully design the experiment the results have a chance of being bogus.

Garbage in, garbage out. And this risk has little to do with the sample size.

 

Statistical risk

The statistical risk involves the sample size directly.

There is a statistical chance that the randomly selected set of a unit for the sample are generally better than the population or vice versa.

The basis for statistical testing and using a random sample is the sample will represent the population. Alas, there is a chance it will not.

We use the term statistical confidence, or type I and type II error, or power, to describe the ability to the sample to properly represent the population.

For example, a 95% confidence means that associated sample as a 5% chance of misrepresenting the population resulting in the analysis producing a false conclusion.

The statistical risk that is acceptable is a policy decision.

The variance

Variation happens.

Variance is the statistical measure of variability in a population of data.

It is what it is and the only way to reduce variability is the change the product design or production process.

A large variance will require a higher sample size to detect a shift in results of an experiment.

We often do not know the population variance and have to estimate the variance elements using the sample data.

The precision

This is related to what we are trying to detect.

If the new design has more strength than the old design, then how much stronger does the new design have to be to be worth noticing.

If we want to detect a one gram increase in average load bearing capability, we would require many more samples than if we only wanted to detect a kilogram difference.

The larger the difference that we desire to detect the fewer samples we will require.

This sample size changes as it is more difficult to conclusively detect a small change.

We may measure one sample from the old and new designs and see a difference, maybe even a very small difference.

Yet does this represent the actual shift and amount of shift in the overall population?

Most likely not.

On the other hand, if we measure a new sample and it is 1,000 times stronger, statistically speaking we can be pretty sure the new design is stronger.

This is rarely the case and we need to detect smaller changes, thus more samples.

Summary

Most sample size formulas contain these three elements.

Two parts, risk and precision, are business or technical decisions. The variance is part of the underlying data and not an option to increase or decrease easily.

The sample size formula is useful for the discussion around risk and decision points prior to conducting the experiment.

It is one way to design and conduct measurements that provide value.

If our results are to be useful than considering all three elements that make up a sample size formula become important.


Related:

Sample Size Success Testing (article)

Sample Size (article)

Three Considerations for Sample Size (article)

 

 

Filed Under: Articles, Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics, on Product Reliability

About Fred Schenkelberg

I am the reliability expert at FMS Reliability, a reliability engineering and management consulting firm I founded in 2004. I left Hewlett Packard (HP)’s Reliability Team, where I helped create a culture of reliability across the corporation, to assist other organizations.

« Does a Certification Make You a Professional Reliability Engineer?
How to Read an OC curve »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Article by Fred Schenkelberg
in the Musings series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • test
  • test
  • test
  • Your Most Important Business Equation
  • Your Suppliers Can Be a Risk to Your Project

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy