Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Fred Schenkelberg 2 Comments

Top Tips for Probability Analysis

Top Tips for Probability Analysis

This is provided courtesy of Amanda at

Egerton Consulting Ltd
Visit our website at www.egertonconsulting.co.uk

<They have a great newsletter and worth subscribing. Fred>

—

Top Tips for Probability Analysis

  1. DO Define Probabilities Correctly
    In particular:
    1. Probabilities must lie in the range 0 to 1 (where 0 represents an event which can never occur and 1 represents a definite certainty)
    2. Probabilities are defined as proportions and are therefore dimensionless quantities, i.e. they cannot be expressed in terms such as “per hour”.
  1. DON’T Use Probability to describe a Rate of Occurrence

Sometimes people use the phrase “the probability is 0.27 per year” to mean “the rate of occurrence is 0.27 per year”. It is very common in our experience to find the use of a probability statement to describe a rate of occurrence. Unfortunately this can lead to errors when calculating the probability of two or more independent events occurring within a specified interval (see example below).

  1. DON’T Apply the Laws of Probability to Rates of Occurrence

Consider two independent events A and B, both of which have a rate of occurrence but are incorrectly described as having “a probability of 0.27 per year” for A and “a probability of 0.85 per year” for B. Using the  laws of probability, this would imply that

                  P(A OR B) = P(A) + P(B) – P(A)×P(B) = 0.27 + 0.85 – 0.27×0.85 = 0.8905

      However because 0.27 and 0.85 are rates of occurrence rather than probabilities, the rate at which either A or B occurs is simply 0.27+0.85=1.12 times per year (a “probability” greater than 1). The Laws of Probability simply do not apply to rates!

  1. DO Convert Rates to Probabilities before Applying the Laws of Probability
    The probability P of an item having a constant  failure rate ‘λ’ failing within a specified time interval ‘t’ can be calculated using the formula:

P = 1-e-λt

      Therefore, it is a straightforward matter to calculate the probability of failure for an item within the time interval ‘t’ of interest.

NOTE: P ≈ λt for small values of λt but this is still a dimensionless quantity

Incorrect application of the laws of probability is very common, and every effort should be made both by practitioners and managers to avoid this as far as possible. To help with this, we offer the following recommendations:

To Practitioners

  • ·         Define probabilities correctly, making sure that they are always dimensionless quantities.
  • ·         Avoid the temptation to take shortcuts – do not apply the laws of probability to quantities that are not strictly probabilities.
  • ·         In written reports avoid the use of expressions such as “the probability is 0.27 per year” which imply that probability is not a dimensionless quantity. 

To Managers

  • Insist that probabilities defined in reports produced within your organisation comply with the “dimensionless” quality of a true probability – this imposes a discipline that will help to ensure that any probability analysis is carried out correctly.
  • Ensure that probabilities have been correctly defined and analysed in all reports that consider safety issues or that are important to your business.

Next time we will put together a list of Top Tips relating to Event Tree Analysis. If you have any other suggestions for topics then please let us know and we will attempt to include them in a future edition of the newsletter.

We look forward to hearing from you.

Amanda

Egerton Consulting Ltd
Tel. +44 (0)1666 860993

Visit our website at www.egertonconsulting.co.uk


 

Related:

Poisson Distribution Calculation (article)

The Four Functions (article)

Fault Tree Analysis 8 Step Process (article)

Filed Under: Articles, CRE Preparation Notes, Probability and Statistics for Reliability Tagged With: Probability

About Fred Schenkelberg

I am the reliability expert at FMS Reliability, a reliability engineering and management consulting firm I founded in 2004. I left Hewlett Packard (HP)’s Reliability Team, where I helped create a culture of reliability across the corporation, to assist other organizations.

« Why HALT is not HALT
Join the Linkedin Group »

Comments

  1. Dave says

    March 31, 2013 at 6:27 PM

    B.F. Skinner’s law of effect said when a response is followed by a reinforcing stimulus, the rate of response increases. So when a response produces a reinforcing stimulus, responses per unit of time (rate) increases. He said the response strengthens. He said when the rate increases, the probability of response increases. So how can I convert, for example, a rate of five responses per minute into a probability number between 0 and 1? Is that possible?

    Dave in New Jersey

    Reply
    • Fred Schenkelberg says

      April 1, 2013 at 9:20 AM

      Hi Dave,

      Not sure your questions relates to the post. Yet, maybe someone will provide a response.

      You be better to post the question on the appropriate forum like the Linkedin Statistics group.

      cheers,

      Fred

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CRE Preparation Notes

Article by Fred Schenkelberg

Join Accendo

Join our members-only community for full access to exclusive eBooks, webinars, training, and more.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Get Full Site Access

Not ready to join?
Stay current on new articles, podcasts, webinars, courses and more added to the Accendo Reliability website each week.
No membership required to subscribe.

[popup type="" link_text="Get Weekly Email Updates" link_class="button" ]

[/popup]

  • CRE Preparation Notes
  • CRE Prep
  • Reliability Management
  • Probability and Statistics for Reliability
  • Reliability in Design and Development
  • Reliability Modeling and Predictions
  • Reliability Testing
  • Maintainability and Availability
  • Data Collection and Use

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy