Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Mike Sondalini Leave a Comment

How to Trick Operators (and everyone else)

How to Trick Operators (and everyone else)

What readers will learn in this article.

  • Operators cannot second-guess plant designer’s intent.
  • The plant designer is responsible of successful plant
    operation.
  • Operators need true indications of plant conditions to
    make the right decisions.
  • Select and locate sensors that provide foolproof
    indication of plant operational status.

Here is an example of a ‘trick’ unintentionally designed into a process plant’s control logic by the plant designers.

Three men huddled around the end plate of a stripped screw conveyor. Two operators and a fitter were digging out a bogged screw conveyor. The operators had started the automatic program to feed product into a mixer that should have been operating but wasn’t. Product had filled the mixer and jammed the feed screw. The operators were alerted to the problem by squealing and smoking vee-belts on the drive. Back at the control panel a light was on that indicated the mixer was in operation. But at the mixer the power isolation switch had been turned off by the prior shift.

The operators had been tricked into thinking the mixer was working by the light being on at the control panel. The light at the panel really meant that the process control program was running and within the program the mixer had been turned on. In reality the mixer had no power to operate it.

The moral of the story is easy to see. If a control panel indicator means something is on or off then it must reflect the true physical operating condition of the equipment. Anything different confuses people, leads to errors and wastes money to fix the damage that must eventually occur.

Information on equipment status is not always easy to obtain from the process. In the case of the above-mentioned screw, a proximity sensor fitted to the trough would detect the screw flights as they passed by. Another way to signal that an item of plant is in operation is to use the power supplied to the motor to generate an on/off signal to the control panel.

The least effective method of operating equipment is to write operating procedures for the equipment and then hope people don’t make errors. People need truthful feedback from plant and equipment to operate them properly and efficiently. With accurate displays that truly reflect equipment status the likelihood of operator error is greatly reduced.

Care should be paid as to where feedback sensors are installed so that all possible modes of failure are detected. Mounting a motion sensor on the drive end of a screw conveyor will not detect a screw shaft broken half way along it. But mounting the sensor at the discharge end will detect such a failure. Alternatively, torque monitoring of the electric motor could be installed and a signal sent to the operators when the torque varied from an acceptable range.

Mike Sondalini – Maintenance Engineer


We (Accendo Reliability) published this article with the kind permission of Feed Forward Publishing, a subsidiary of BIN95.com

Web: trade-school.education
E-mail: info@trade-school.education

Filed Under: Articles, on Maintenance Reliability, Plant Maintenance Tagged With: safety

About Mike Sondalini

In engineering and maintenance since 1974, Mike’s career extends across original equipment manufacturing, beverage processing and packaging, steel fabrication, chemical processing and manufacturing, quality management, project management, enterprise asset management, plant and equipment maintenance, and maintenance training. His specialty is helping companies build highly effective operational risk management processes, develop enterprise asset management systems for ultra-high reliable assets, and instil the precision maintenance skills needed for world class equipment reliability.

« Metal Fatigue Failure Mechanism Accelerated Life Testing
Could Your Pacemaker be Hacked? »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Article by
Mike Sondalini
in the
Plant Maintenance series articles provided courtesy of Feed Forward Publications and Lifetime Reliability Solutions.

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • test
  • test
  • test
  • Your Most Important Business Equation
  • Your Suppliers Can Be a Risk to Your Project

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy