Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Robert (Bob) J. Latino Leave a Comment

Turning RCA into ROI in Healthcare? – Part 3 – Unknown Benefit…Intellectual Capital

Turning RCA into ROI in Healthcare? – Part 3 – Unknown Benefit…Intellectual Capital

The Greatest Benefit of RCA is Generally an Unknown…Intellectual Capital

Because business is measured based on credits and debits, this is how we must express effectiveness of initiatives in reality. However, the physical costs are NOT the greatest benefit derived from RCA when done properly.

The greatest benefit of RCA that typically is not captured via our financials is the intellectual capital of the human being. Unfortunately, society has not progressed to the point yet where it is particularly comfortable with putting dollars to intellectual capital. As far as GAAP financial standards go, equipment is still an asset and the human being is still a liability. Therefore, the concept of a value for intellectual capital on the asset side is pretty distant. At best, intellectual capital can be considered an intangible asset which is often difficult to value.

The reality is that even if a dollar figure cannot be put on intellectual capital, it is the greatest asset of any corporation. Human decision making errors trigger undesirable outcomes so it is only prudent that making a human more aware of their situation will decrease the number of errors they make because they will be proactive and know what the potential consequences will be. How does one measure a reduction in human errors? It is nearly impossible to pinpoint mainly because such a metric has not been developed and captured in the past so therefore there is no benchmark to start from and measure against.

However, a reduction in decision making errors should surface in a reduction of undesirable outcomes. If the human does not trigger the physical sequence with a poor decision, the adverse consequence will not surface. If there is no consequence, there is no cost associated with correcting the situation as in our blood redraw example. Through consequences of human errors, we will see them appear on our financials. However, such a reduction in costs is rarely, if ever, attributed to a grass roots improvement in human decision making. Trying to make that case with numbers is nearly impossible, yet it is reality.

The Role of RCA in Improving Human Decision Making

Human decision making can be quantumly improved by RCA via participation on the RCA teams and by proper dissemination of RCA results through an RCA knowledge management system.

Participating on an RCA team forces people to look at failures in the context of a system. They do not just look at the failure itself in isolation, they look at the work environment in which the failure occurred. This takes into consideration support systems, physical environment, regulatory environment, staffing, etc. True RCA tends to analyze the systems in place for deficiencies that could have pressured someone to make a decision that turned out to be the wrong decision.

By participating on an RCA team people are forced to reconstruct the path of the failure via cause-and-effect relationships. This is where the learning takes place, having to back track the path of “fallen dominoes”. There are always “aha” moments in these sessions where team members believed one thing to be true and because they had to back track they found out that their belief was simply not true…there was a deviation from what should have happened and the evidence on hand supports this contradiction.

Organizations should design and create a knowledge management infrastructure that would store successful RCA logic. They should make this RCA database readily available to those in the organization who may be in positions to make similar decisions in the future. If these people can see the past logic that led to a failure (undesirable outcome) then they will be sure not to fall into the same trap.

Ensuring people participate on RCA teams and making successful analyses are not capital intensive tasks. They do not require new technologies or creating complicated systems. They can be executed with existing tools and systems. What is required is the foresight, knowledge and understanding by executives that deficient systems pressure humans to make improper decisions and that triggers a string of physical consequences resulting in undesirable outcomes…and undesirable outcomes directly correlate to the bottom-line!

Filed Under: Articles, on Maintenance Reliability, The RCA

About Robert (Bob) J. Latino

Robert Latino is currently a Principal at Prelical Solutions, LLC, along with his brother Ken Latino.  Bob was a Founder and CEO of Reliability Center, Inc. (RCI), until it was acquired in 2019.  RCI is a 50-year-old Reliability Consulting firm specializing in improving Equipment, Process and Human Reliability. Mr. Latino received his Bachelor’s degree in Business Administration and Management from Virginia Commonwealth University. 

« It Takes a Village
Hazard Analysis and FMEA »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

logo for The RCA article series image of BobArticle by Robert (Bob) J. Latino
CEO of Reliability Center, Inc.

in the The RCA article series

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • test
  • test
  • test
  • Your Most Important Business Equation
  • Your Suppliers Can Be a Risk to Your Project

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy