Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Carl S. Carlson 2 Comments

Understanding FMEA Failure Modes – Part 1

Understanding FMEA Failure Modes – Part 1

Why Describing the Mode of Failure is Essential

Do you know why we ask for the “mode” of failure when performing FMEAs? This article will provide theory and practical examples of defining failure modes, and highlight an application tip that can improve your FMEA effectiveness.

“I haven’t failed, I’ve just found ten thousand ways that don’t work”
Thomas Edison

Definition of “Failure Mode”

The term “failure mode” combines two words with unique meanings. The Concise Oxford English Dictionary defines “failure” as the act of ceasing to function or the state of not functioning. “Mode” is defined as a way in which something occurs.

What is the definition of “Failure Mode” in an FMEA?

A “failure mode” is the manner in which an item or operation potentially fails to meet or deliver the intended function and associated requirements. Depending on the definition of failure established by the analysis team, failure modes may include failure to perform a function within defined limits, inadequate or poor performance of the function, intermittent performance of a function, and/or performing an unintended or undesired function. There may be many failure modes for each function.

It is essential to understand “functions” before understanding and identifying failure modes. Reference the article “Understanding FMEA Functions.”

By identifying the “mode” of failure, the manner in which the item potentially fails, the FMEA team can more easily move towards the cause of failure.

Why the “mode” of failure?

The analysis is called Failure Mode and Effects Analysis. Why is “mode” of failure part of the analysis? Why not merely “failure”? The answer lies in the progression to root cause. FMEA is in part a journey from what an item is intended to do all the way to the root cause of why it does not accomplish its intention. Some practitioners identify “failure” as the antithesis of the function. The container is supposed to contain fluid up to 5000 psi, and it does not contain fluid. However, the “mode” is the way in which something occurs. It goes beyond the antithesis, and provides more information. An example is “leak.” If the container leaks, that describes the manner in which the container does not contain the fluid. By describing the mode of failure, we are one step closer to the cause. It also helps describe the effect of failure.

How are Failure Modes identified in FMEAs?

The FMEA team can be asked a question, such as, “what is the manner in which the item does not accomplish its intended function?” or similar questions.

The use of failure conditions can help identify unique failure modes. Examples of failure conditions include: premature operation, failure to operate at a prescribed time (complete loss of function), intermittent operation, failure to cease operation at a prescribed time, loss of output during operation (reduced performance), degraded operation (loss of performance over time), and/or performing an unintended or undesired function. Each function examined in relation to these failure conditions, ensures identification of all relevant failure modes.

What is an example of a Design FMEA failure mode?

Item: Power steering pump

Function: Delivers hydraulic power for steering by transforming oil pressure at inlet (xx psi) into higher oil pressure at outlet [yy psi] during engine idle speed

Failure Mode: Inadequate outlet pressure [less than yy psi]

Poorly worded example of Failure Mode: Power steering pump fails

What is an example of a Process FMEA failure mode?

Process Step: Induction harden shafts using induction hardening machine

Function: Induction harden shafts using induction-hardening machine ABC, with hardness to specification #123, and case depth [xx] inches

Failure Mode: Shaft hardness less than BHN “X”

Poorly worded example of Failure Mode: shaft fails

Application Tip

Identifying failure modes for inclusion in an FMEA is not an academic listing of every conceivable failure mode (such as a failure brought about by the unlikely event of a meteor striking the item) but rather a list of potential failure modes of concern to at least one of the FMEA team members. Most companies are limited in their time, budget and skilled resources. Therefore, provided the FMEA team has the correct membership and is led by a skilled facilitator, it is good practice to limit FMEA entries to areas of genuine concern to one or more of the team members.

Next Article

On June 12, 1972 an American Airlines DC 10 lost its aft cargo door soon after taking off from Detroit. This incident will be used as a case study to challenge readers with an FMEA problem, and practice identifying the elements of an FMEA.

Filed Under: Articles, Inside FMEA, on Tools & Techniques

About Carl S. Carlson

Carl S. Carlson is a consultant and instructor in the areas of FMEA, reliability program planning and other reliability engineering disciplines, supporting over one hundred clients from a wide cross-section of industries. He has 35 years of experience in reliability testing, engineering, and management positions, including senior consultant with ReliaSoft Corporation, and senior manager for the Advanced Reliability Group at General Motors.

« My favorite reliability phrases
The Top 5 Ways to Ruin a Web-Meeting »

Comments

  1. Imad says

    August 12, 2019 at 7:19 AM

    Thank you, i’ve awlays wondered why we discuss modes of failures an not failures.

    Reply
    • Carl Carlson says

      August 12, 2019 at 11:52 AM

      Good question, Imad. The reason why we discuss the mode of falure rather than the failure itself, is the mode of failure helps to get to the cause, FMEA is a journey to understand the causes of failure and what can be done to reduce risk. The failure mode is he manner in which the item does not accomplish the function (and requirements). Take a water bottle, If the function is to contain water, and failure is doesn’t contain water, the mode of falure might be “leak.” Understanding the mode (leak) gets us closer to understanding the cause, such as bottle wall too thin,

      Hope that helps.

      Carl

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Articles by Carl Carlson
in the Inside FMEA series

[popup type="" link_text="Logo Info" ]

Information about FMEA Icon

Inside FMEA can be visually represented by a large tree, with roots, a solid trunk, branches, and leaves.

- The roots of the tree represent the philosophy and guiding principles for effective FMEAs.
- The solid trunk of the tree represents the fundamentals for all FMEAs.
- The branches represent the various FMEA applications.
- The leaves represent the valuable outcomes of FMEAs.
- This is intended to convey that each of the various FMEA applications have the same fundamentals and philosophical roots.

 

For example, the roots of the tree can represent following philosophy and guiding principles for effective FMEAs, such as:

1. Correct procedure         2. Lessons learned
3. Trained team                 4. Focus on prevention
5. Integrated with DFR    6. Skilled facilitation
7. Management support

The tree trunk represents the fundamentals of FMEA. All types of FMEA share common fundamentals, and these are essential to successful FMEA applications.

The tree branches can include the different types of FMEAs, including:

1. System FMEA         2. Design FMEA
3. Process FMEA        4. DRBFM
5. Hazard Analysis     6. RCM or Maintenance FMEA
7. Software FMEA      8. Other types of FMEA

The leaves of the tree branches represent individual FMEA projects, with a wide variety of FMEA scopes and results. [/popup]

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Posts

  • test
  • test
  • test
  • Your Most Important Business Equation
  • Your Suppliers Can Be a Risk to Your Project

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy