Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by James Kovacevic 1 Comment

Understanding Reliability Block Diagrams

Understanding Reliability Block Diagrams

How To Evaluate The Reliability Of A System Or Process

60% of failures and safety issues can be prevented by ensuring there is a robust equipment design and that Maintenance & Reliability is taken into account during the design phase. Equipment should be designed with the following in mind:

  • Designed for Fault Tolerance
  • Designed to Fail Safely
  • Designed with early warning of the failure to the user
  • Designed with a built-in diagnostic system to identify fault location
  • Designed to eliminate all or critical failure modes cost effectively, if possible.

To ensure that the equipment design is capable or yielding our requirements an analysis needs to be performed on the design to ensure the system or process can deliver. There is much different analysis available to perform the analysis, but a relatively simple and widely accepted approach is the Reliability Block Diagram.

Reliability Block Diagram

The Reliability Block Diagram (RBD) is used to identify potential areas of poor reliability and where improvements can be made to lower the failure rates for the equipment. This method can be used in both the design and operational phase to identify poor reliability and provide targeted improvements.

The RBD shows the logical connections of components within a piece of equipment. It is not necessarily the schematic diagram of the equipment, but the functional components of the system. The equipment is made up of multiple components/systems in series, parallel and a combination of the two. These components/systems and configuration of them provides us with the inherent reliability of the equipment. The RBD analysis consists of reducing the system to simple series and parallel blocks which can be analyzed using the appropriate Reliability formula. Reliability typically utilizes three main formulas;

  • Reliability;Reliability(Mission Time) = e-λt

    λ (lambda) = Failure rate = 1/MTBF
    t = mission time in cycles, hours, miles, etc.
    e = natural logarithm = 2.71828
  • Reliability(System) = R1 x R2 x R3 x R4 x ….RN
  • Reliability(Active Redundant Parallel System) = 1 – (1 – R1)(1 – R2)

Now that the Reliability formulas are understood, the RBD can be built. A simple series RBD is shown as;

A simple series RBD

A simple parallel RBD is shown as;

Simple Parallel RBD

When analyzing a parallel system in the RBD, the operating context of the parallel system must be understood; is the parallel system an active redundant system or are all or a portion of the parallel branches are required to operate the equipment?

Parallel RBD

In the above example R5, R6 & R7 are all active redundant branches, so the equipment only needs 1 of the three branches to operate and meet its required performance.

Parallel RBD

In the opposite example, we have a system that requires 2 out of the three branches to operate at any given time. This means that R8 & R9, R8 & R10, or R9 & R10 must be in working order meets its required performance.

There are a few different Reliability calculations for the system that requires x amount of y parallel branches to operate, and they are in the table below.

x number of branches out of y Reliability Equation
1 out of 2
2 out of 2
1-(1-R)2
R2
1 out of 3
2 out of 3
3 out of 3
1-(1-R)3
R3 + 3 R2 (1-R)
R3
1 out of 4
2 out of 4
3 out of 4
4 out of 4
1-(1-R)4
R4 + 4 R3 (1-R) + 6 R2 (1-R)2
R4 + 4 R3 (1-R)
R4

Calculating Reliability of a System

In this example, a pumping system is required to provide a reliability of 90%. The pumping system (simplified for explanation purposes) could be broken into an RBD and shown as;

Sample System RBD

The Blocks reflect the various systems in the equipment;

  • R1 = Inlet control valve
  • R2 = Motors (R2.1 = Motor 1, R2.2 = Motor 2, R2.3 = Motor 3) (This requires all 3 of the parallel branches to operate)
  • R3 = Fluid Supply
  • R4 = Distribution Manifold
  • R5 = Tank Level Sensor
  • R6 = Pumps (these are all required to operate the asset and is therefore not a redundant system)
  • R7 = Discharge Control Valve
  • R8 = Control System

Once the RBD has been developed, we then need to determine the Reliability of each block and the overall system. We will use the pumping system as our example;

Using the Reliability formula and either the vendor’s data and the history of like assets, the reliability must be calculated for each of the individual blocks and populate them with the reliability value.

Sample System RBD with Reliability Values

Next, the reliability of R2 is calculated. Since it requires all three systems to operate a simple parallel formula would be used;

  • R2 = R 3
  • R2 = (.99)3
  • R2 = .97

Next the same is done for R6

  • R6 = R3
  • R6 = (.98)3
  • R6 = .94

Lastly, since R4 is dependent on R3 & R5 it should treat it as a series system.

  • R = R3 x R4 x R5
  • R = .9 x 1 x .85
  • R = .76

Next, the RBD can be simplified to a simple series system;

Condensed RBD

R = R8 x R1 x R2 x R345 x R6 x R7

R = .99 x .99 x .97 x .76 x .94 x .99

R = .67

In the calculation, it can be observed that the pumping system with a Reliability of 0.67 will not meet our needs. What can be observed is that R345 is the lowest point of Reliability so improvements in the design should be directed there. If the design was changed for R345 and reliability brought up to .99, the pumping system would still fall short of the required reliability at .88, so design team must look for additional blocks for improvements and also how the system is arranged and possibly introduce active redundant systems.

Are You Using Reliability Block Diagrams?

How many of you are using RBDs in your design or improvement process? What benefits have you found in using them? For those not using RBDs, what is preventing you from using them?

In the next post, RBD will be discussed in additional detail, discussing the Markov Method, Network Models and a practical example of them.

Remember, to find success; you must first solve the problem, then achieve the implementation of the solution, and finally sustain winning results.

I’m James Kovacevic
Eruditio, LLC

Where Education Meets Application

References

  • BQR
  • BQR Video Library<
  • Fixtress Software Package
  • CARE Software Package
  • APMOptimizer Software Package

Filed Under: Articles, Maintenance and Reliability, on Maintenance Reliability

About James Kovacevic

James is a trainer, speaker, and consultant that specializes in bringing profitability, productivity, availability, and sustainability to manufacturers around the globe.

Through his career, James has made it his personal mission to make industry a profitable place; where individuals and manufacturers possess the resources, knowledge, and courage to sustainably lower their operating costs.

« ISO 31000 in Government: A Case Study
Services we Offer with Project Progression Case Study »

Comments

  1. Les Warrington says

    July 12, 2019 at 7:09 AM

    Hi James, Maybe you could check out my article “Dual ring network reliability”. I’m looking for any reference to prior publication of the analytical solution I provide. By the way, RBD don’t help with the solution. Best regards, Les

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Maintenance & Reliability series


by James Kovacevic
High Performance Reliability

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • test
  • test
  • test
  • Your Most Important Business Equation
  • Your Suppliers Can Be a Risk to Your Project

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy