Accendo Reliability

Your Reliability Engineering Professional Development Site

  • Home
  • About
    • Contributors
  • Reliability.fm
    • Speaking Of Reliability
    • Rooted in Reliability: The Plant Performance Podcast
    • Quality during Design
    • Way of the Quality Warrior
    • Critical Talks
    • Dare to Know
    • Maintenance Disrupted
    • Metal Conversations
    • The Leadership Connection
    • Practical Reliability Podcast
    • Reliability Matters
    • Reliability it Matters
    • Maintenance Mavericks Podcast
    • Women in Maintenance
    • Accendo Reliability Webinar Series
  • Articles
    • CRE Preparation Notes
    • on Leadership & Career
      • Advanced Engineering Culture
      • Engineering Leadership
      • Managing in the 2000s
      • Product Development and Process Improvement
    • on Maintenance Reliability
      • Aasan Asset Management
      • AI & Predictive Maintenance
      • Asset Management in the Mining Industry
      • CMMS and Reliability
      • Conscious Asset
      • EAM & CMMS
      • Everyday RCM
      • History of Maintenance Management
      • Life Cycle Asset Management
      • Maintenance and Reliability
      • Maintenance Management
      • Plant Maintenance
      • Process Plant Reliability Engineering
      • ReliabilityXperience
      • RCM Blitz®
      • Rob’s Reliability Project
      • The Intelligent Transformer Blog
      • The People Side of Maintenance
      • The Reliability Mindset
    • on Product Reliability
      • Accelerated Reliability
      • Achieving the Benefits of Reliability
      • Apex Ridge
      • Metals Engineering and Product Reliability
      • Musings on Reliability and Maintenance Topics
      • Product Validation
      • Reliability Engineering Insights
      • Reliability in Emerging Technology
    • on Risk & Safety
      • CERM® Risk Insights
      • Equipment Risk and Reliability in Downhole Applications
      • Operational Risk Process Safety
    • on Systems Thinking
      • Communicating with FINESSE
      • The RCA
    • on Tools & Techniques
      • Big Data & Analytics
      • Experimental Design for NPD
      • Innovative Thinking in Reliability and Durability
      • Inside and Beyond HALT
      • Inside FMEA
      • Integral Concepts
      • Learning from Failures
      • Progress in Field Reliability?
      • R for Engineering
      • Reliability Engineering Using Python
      • Reliability Reflections
      • Testing 1 2 3
      • The Manufacturing Academy
  • eBooks
  • Resources
    • Accendo Authors
    • FMEA Resources
    • Feed Forward Publications
    • Openings
    • Books
    • Webinars
    • Journals
    • Higher Education
    • Podcasts
  • Courses
    • 14 Ways to Acquire Reliability Engineering Knowledge
    • Reliability Analysis Methods online course
    • Measurement System Assessment
    • SPC-Process Capability Course
    • Design of Experiments
    • Foundations of RCM online course
    • Quality during Design Journey
    • Reliability Engineering Statistics
    • Quality Engineering Statistics
    • An Introduction to Reliability Engineering
    • Reliability Engineering for Heavy Industry
    • An Introduction to Quality Engineering
    • Process Capability Analysis course
    • Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process course
    • Return on Investment online course
    • CRE Preparation Online Course
    • Quondam Courses
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Live Events
  • Calendar
    • Call for Papers Listing
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Webinar Calendar
  • Login
    • Member Home

by Greg Hutchins Leave a Comment

Usability and Its Impact on Risks

Usability and Its Impact on Risks

Guest Post by Howard M. Wiener (first posted on CERM ® RISK INSIGHTS – reposted here with permission)

How we design and implement systems and processes can play a large role in determining their usability.

Poor usability can contribute to avoidable risks.  This post addresses the need to employ risk identification and mitigation techniques in the course of designing things in order to minimize the probability of negative outcomes.

What is usability?

ISO defines usability as “The extent to which a product can be used by specified users to achieve specified goals with effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction in a specified context of use.”

It is most commonly associated with the design of websites and applications but it is equally applicable to all sorts of products and business processes.

A common framework for assessing usability includes:

  • Learnability—How easy is it for users to figure out how to perform the tasks necessary to achieve their goals?  Design consistency and attention to creating easy-to-follow functional paths contribute to learnability.
  • Efficiency—Have all unnecessary steps to achieving goals been eliminated?  In website design, eliminating unnecessary clicks and page downloads is the holy grail of efficiency.  The proliferation of ‘one-click’ buying is a testament to users’ short attention spans, impulsivity and the need for efficiency.  (How many prospective job seekers abandon an application process when faced with the chore of reiterating all of the information on their resume into a series of forms on the employer’s website?)
  • Memorability—Having learned how to navigate an application or website once, how easy is it to remember how to do it again the next time?  Forcing users to re-learn how to use an application or website creates fatigue and aversion.  Memorability and learnability are positively correlated; systems that are difficult to learn are also difficult to remember.
  • Error Avoidance—Is the application or website designed to help users avoid making bad choices or errors?  There is an increasing focus among prominent Computer Science departments on exactly this subject—how to design interfaces that guide users in ways that help them to maintain the security of their personal information, as well as how to meet the other usability criteria.
  • Satisfaction—Just as we appreciate the feel and function of a finely designed and made tool, we also appreciate interacting with a well-designed application interface, one that enables us to accomplish something with minimal effort, which we can remember how to work with from one use to the next and which leads us away from making stupid mistakes.

The implications of usability

So, websites, applications, business processes and products with good usability intuitively feel ‘right’ in use, imbue users with a sense of satisfaction, make it easy to accomplish goals and help avoid making mistakes or bad choices.

What about those with poor usability?

Poor usability leads to exactly the opposite results, as measured against each of the criteria identified, above.

Websites, applications, business processes, and products with poor usability are hard to learn, easy to forget, awkward to use, promote mistakes and errors and create little satisfaction among users.

More importantly, they create risks that users will fail to achieve the goals that they are supposed to support and, thereby, create negative consequences; for instance:

  • recruiting websites that frustrate job applicants to the point at which they abandon the application process, costing employers access to potentially well-qualified individuals,
  • Department of Motor Vehicles process designs in which each function has a separate line, requiring users to re-queue for each step in the workflow in order to complete a task,
  • uncoordinated warning systems in military aircraft that resulted in Viet Nam-era pilots disabling most alerts so that they could focus on flying their planes and reacting to threats instead of responding to alarms and
  • aviation interfaces in commercial aircraft that may have contributed to a number of fatal accidents because pilots failed to register that autopilot systems had become disengaged or that the planes were descending to dangerous altitudes.

What to do?

Certainly, a comprehensive prescription is beyond the scope of this post.

However, many of the same ideas about risk management that the PMI promotes are equally applicable to planning usability into design and implementation:

  • Thorough Use-Case analysis—Understanding all the ways something might be used is the key to designing it for optimal usability.  No one wants to build things that are frustrating or which obstruct discharge of tasks or achievement of goals.  Comprehensive use-case analysis and documentation of goals to be served and workflows or navigation paths that will be enabled to meet them are crucial to good usability design.
  • Behavior Modeling—This is a simulation technique used by usability specialists to understand how users will interact with a system, product or process.  Often, behavior modeling reveals that users follow paths that are quite different from those anticipated by designers.
  • Risk Modeling and Design Revisions—This is where the attention to usability is most highly focused.  By identifying what can go wrong at each step in every use-case and then assessing the impact of the error, designers can focus on revising the design to help avoid errors and their negative consequences.  All of the qualitative and quantitative techniques that project managers use are relevant here.  Some design flaws are merely annoying, such as having to reload a web page unnecessarily, while others may be truly catastrophic, such as ignoring an avionics alert.  All must be identified and addressed in order to mitigate design risks.

 

Summary

In the end, usability design is an important factor in overall risk-avoidance, mitigation and management.

It applies just as much to business processes and physical products as it does to application systems and websites.  When designing complex processes, the automation that supports them or commercial or consumer products, it’s critical to develop a thorough understanding of how intended users will interact with them, where opportunities for error or misuse exist and revise the design to minimize the probability of such occurrences.

Usability is a highly evolved discipline and there are professional practitioners who should be consulted when it seems as if the scope of the design task has exceeded the experience or expertise of designers.

The risks avoided may be quite considerable.

 

Bio:

Howard M. Wiener is President of Codiscent Americas, a New York-based company that implements software Better, Cheaper and Faster using proprietary Model-Driven Generative Engineering and Reverse-Engineering technology.

Mr. Wiener holds an MS in Business Management from Carnegie-Mellon University and is a PMI-certified Project Management Professional.

He can be reached at:

howardmwiener@gmail.com
howard.wiener@codiscent.com

(914) 723-1406 Office
(914) 419-5956 Mobile
(347) 651-1406  Universal Number

Filed Under: Articles, CERM® Risk Insights, on Risk & Safety

About Greg Hutchins

Greg Hutchins PE CERM is the evangelist of Future of Quality: Risk®. He has been involved in quality since 1985 when he set up the first quality program in North America based on Mil Q 9858 for the natural gas industry. Mil Q became ISO 9001 in 1987

He is the author of more than 30 books. ISO 31000: ERM is the best-selling and highest-rated ISO risk book on Amazon (4.8 stars). Value Added Auditing (4th edition) is the first ISO risk-based auditing book.

« Valuable Secrets in Every Work Order Report
Become a Friendlier Person for your Reliability Culture »

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CERM® Risk Insights series Article by Greg Hutchins, Editor and noted guest authors

Join Accendo

Receive information and updates about articles and many other resources offered by Accendo Reliability by becoming a member.

It’s free and only takes a minute.

Join Today

Recent Articles

  • test
  • test
  • test
  • Your Most Important Business Equation
  • Your Suppliers Can Be a Risk to Your Project

© 2025 FMS Reliability · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service · Cookies Policy